Hundebolg

Are you some kind of religious bigot that disdains science and mathematics ?

Reverend_Hellh0und

Actually I posted a statistition from havard who rolls the lancet like a cigarette.


Here it is again. Care to comment on it or will you stick your fingers in your ear and go "lallalalalalalalalala"?


Michelle Malkin Document drop: A new critique of the 2004 Lancet Iraq death toll study


I await.

__________________
كافر
Caith siar é agus ná lig anair á

Hundebolg

All those "critiques" of the Lancet study lack any scientific credibility, else they would have been published in the Lancet itself. Get yourself straight with the real numbers: Madman Bush caused the death of over a million innocent victims lying the **** out of ignorant american citizens like you. That's all you need to know.

Reverend_Hellh0und

Oh thats right your a kooky conspiratists eurotrash elitist....


Kane is a harvard statistition.


Debunk his work instead of feeding me bullplop.

__________________
كافر
Caith siar é agus ná lig anair á

Billo_Really

Alright, the door swings both ways.

Why should we believe your link. It is from one of the most whackiest righties on the block. Michelle Malkin is a total psycho. So anything you use from her website is to taken as automatically false.

So your little stat-man is FOS!

If you want to play this game, that's how we play it.

Reverend_Hellh0und

You tried oh so hard, and you failed miserably.


The Kane study from Oxford.
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/users/On..._versus_L2.pdf


You lose. again. as usual.

__________________
كافر
Caith siar é agus ná lig anair á

Billo_Really

You submit something you don't even understand and can not read all the way through.

Reverend_Hellh0und

No billio it is you who don't understand it. Remember you admitted it.



So is it because of the source or because you don't understand it that you wont address it?

__________________
كافر
Caith siar é agus ná lig anair á

Billo_Really

I told you to stop calling me names!

oldreliable67

As others have pointed out, the Oxford study also states:

Thats really all anyone needs to know about the validity of the Lancet study. Contrary to accepted practice, the authors did not make public the data necessary for independent validation of their work. A degree in statistics or epidemiology is not required to understand that unless or until they do, their work should not be accepted at face value. It should be taken into consideration with appropriate caveats, yes, but their results should not be accepted as definitive nor reliable.