Originally Posted by Citizen

What witnesses. None of this was tried in a court of law. Just here Say. From what the D.A. said, it does not coincide with you side of the story. Blacks are thugs and whites defend themselfs. (likely Story)

Originally Posted by Citizen

Did you read the second article I posted? I Doubt it.

Originally Posted by Citizen

I have seen no report that indicates that Bailey hit back. There was no one else asked to leave the party but Bailey. This is the D.A's statement:

Originally Posted by dixon76710

Here is a likely more accurrate description of the events at the party, compared to the BS propaganda that Chanda and citizen are trying to pass off as "facts"

Originally Posted by dixon76710

LOLOL!!!! I guess its only a "bogus account" when I post it. When you post it, it is somehow transformed into something else.

Originally Posted by Caine

You know VERY LITTLE about criminal justice my friend. But first..
A. You have the facts wrong. The "white kids beating up the black kid" story is completely fabricated, as evidence by my link earlier in the thread that nobody bothered to read because it didn't come from a black supremacy group, or a liberal new outlet that got their information from a black supremacy group.. you know, like The Final Call founded by Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam
B. Do you think maybe the black kid was never asked to testify to the minor charge placed against the one white who initiated the fight (and thus was the primary aggressor) was because maybe that one white kid plead guilty? Testimony isn't required when the defendant admits guilt.


Threatening a group of thugs chasing you down and threatening to harm you with a gun to defend yourself.... Hmm.... lets think about this....
Nope, sorry your wrong. Your just here to race bait is all. As evidenced by....

DING DING DING DING DING! WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!!

I was waiting for someone to throw that accusation out there because several of us do not fit the mold of being apologetic towards racial violence perpetrated by blacks due to the ever magnificent "N" word, or the symbolism in a noose (which was used LONG, LONG, LONG, LONG, LONG before American Slavery, and could be a symbol of many things).




That depends on what the statutes are for the age of a minor, or mental competency, or other contributing factors in the specific state in which the "minor" is charged.

That kid would be sitting in jail right now if he were charged in N.C., since you are charged as an adult at age 16, regardless.

Originally Posted by Caine

Oh Joy! More Race Baiting!

Blacks or Whites who gang up on an individual (Three chasing kid at store where kid defend himself with gun) (6 beating the mess out of 1 unsuspecting kid at school) are thugs. Period.

Are you seriously trying to say that the white kid with a shotgun was threatening three innocent harmless black kids who were doing nothing to him? Even though there were witness accounts stating the opposite?

BTW: If your slow to react, this is in reference to the incident that occurred at the store, not the barn or the school.

Originally Posted by Chanda

This is a description according to DA Reed Walters who has been widely criticized for prosecutorial misconduct. Why would you find his description the most credible when he has been caught lying and threatening the students to "end their lives with a stroke of his pen," and then proceeding to carry out his threat?

Originally Posted by dixon76710

Its the same quote you posted einstein.