![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a year? | |||
| Yes |
|
18 | 46.15% |
| No |
|
21 | 53.85% |
| Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#181 |
|
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Seen: Today 09:58 PM
Location: west
Posts: 3,023
Thanks: 650
Thanked 527 Times in 405 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
Is there anybody on this thread that thinks that we have the perfect healthcare? Is there anybody that thinks out present system can’t be improved? So why compare our system with Canada, or any other country? I think that this country of ours is capable of coming up with something better than any other country on the planet, if, and it is a bit if, we can keep the politicians out of the loop.
|
|
|
|
|
#182 | |
|
Goddess of Bacon
![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Last Seen: Today 10:27 PM
Posts: 9,940
Thanks: 2,775
Thanked 4,087 Times in 2,366 Posts
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
Quote:
There wasn't a better thing I could have seen and experienced to show me the ills of medicaid/medicare than working in emergency medicine. The majority of our calls were BS calls. Every single BS call I went on involved a medicaid/medicare recipient. People who actually had to pay for an ambulance ride themselves wouldn't call an ambulance for a slight fever. Or a broken toe. Or a simple rash. Or just because they didn't 'feel well'. They wouldn't call just so they would get attention from neighbors. They wouldn't call and fake symptoms just to get a ride into town and then sign AMA out of the ER and go to the nearest bar to drink. Here I was working two jobs - one of them on the river four days a week, and then a straight 72-hour shift on the ambulance. I couldn't afford my own health insurance. But I was helping to pay for THEIRS. These people who drug me out at 2am because their pinky nail hurt. These people who refused to work for a living since they could so easily live off the government - off of ME. I had to forgo my own health insurance so I could pay for THEIRS. Because if I didn't have to pay so much in taxes... I just might have been able to afford health insurance myself. You want to talk about furious, I was furious. It infuriated me every single night I worked. In addition to that, I was shown just how they were treated in ERs too. Not well. Limited medical attention, only the amount necessary to get them out of the door. Quality care? Heh.. yeah right. Not when the docs know they're not going to get paid for it. They do what's necessary and do nothing "above and beyond". Get someone with private insurance though and there was a world of difference. Having seen the difference... give me private insurance every single time. Socialized medicine only fosters mediocre care and long wait times. Then the government tried to "crack down" on the medicaid/medicare abuse. So now they wouldn't pay for ambulance rides unless it was deemed "medically necessary" for the patient to ride in the ambulance. The provider's answer to that? Lie on trip sheets. Now every single medicaid/medicare patient we carried was deemed "medically necessary" to ride in the ambulance. It was at that point I left the field. I refused to lie on trip sheets to defraud an already defrauded and bankrupt system. Especially when it benefited NO ONE. So no, our system isn't perfect. If the government would get the hell out of it, it would make it a helluva lot better. Government involvement has been the cause of our problems, less government involvement will inevitably cure many of our ills. |
|
|
__________________
The point to remember is that what the government gives it must first take away. ~John S. Coleman |
||
|
|
|
|
#183 |
|
Sage
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Seen: Today 07:32 PM
Posts: 9,033
Thanks: 674
Thanked 2,240 Times in 1,602 Posts
|
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
Bush's False Claims About Children's Health Insurance
September 21, 2007 The president mischaracterizes congressional efforts to expand the SCHIP program... The president repeated a false charge that has been bandied about by the administration and other Republicans: Bush: Their proposal would result in taking a program meant to help poor children and turning it into one that covers children in households with incomes of up to $83,000 a year. In fact, nothing in either the House or Senate bill would force coverage for families earning $83,000 a year. That's already possible under current law, but no state sets its cut-off that high for a family of four and the bill contains no requirement for any such increase. The Bush administration, in fact, just denied a request by New York to set its income cut-off at $82,600 for a family of four, a move New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and members of Congress from the state have vigorously protested. And Bush would retain the authority to deny similar applications under the proposed legislation. FactCheck.org: Bush's False Claims About Children's Health Insurance |
|
|
|
|
#184 | |
|
Sage
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: Today 08:08 PM
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 27,397
Thanks: 2,900
Thanked 1,232 Times in 963 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
FOR THE LIKES OF LIBERALS LIKE KERRY AND DURBIN: "IF YOU CAN'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM." |
||
|
|
|
|
#185 |
|
Sage
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Seen: Today 07:32 PM
Posts: 9,033
Thanks: 674
Thanked 2,240 Times in 1,602 Posts
|
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
|
|
|
|
|
#186 |
|
Sage
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: Today 08:08 PM
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 27,397
Thanks: 2,900
Thanked 1,232 Times in 963 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
|
|
__________________
FOR THE LIKES OF LIBERALS LIKE KERRY AND DURBIN: "IF YOU CAN'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM." |
|
|
|
|
|
#187 | |
|
Sage
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Seen: Today 07:32 PM
Posts: 9,033
Thanks: 674
Thanked 2,240 Times in 1,602 Posts
|
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
Quote:
BTW Do need a bridge? I have one for sale. |
|
|
|
|
|
#188 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Seen: 12-21-09 09:18 AM
Location: Miami
Posts: 19,405
Thanks: 1,415
Thanked 2,223 Times in 1,524 Posts
|
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
Sure thing, and you know this because you've gone to France to receive medical care for a serious illness how many times? Or did you read it "somewhere"?
|
|
|
|
|
#189 |
|
Sage
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: Today 08:08 PM
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 27,397
Thanks: 2,900
Thanked 1,232 Times in 963 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
You don't have to go there just find that special from ABC 20/20 with John Stossel and you will find out about Frances free health care........
|
|
__________________
FOR THE LIKES OF LIBERALS LIKE KERRY AND DURBIN: "IF YOU CAN'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM." |
|
|
|
|
|
#190 |
|
Sage
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: Today 08:08 PM
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 27,397
Thanks: 2,900
Thanked 1,232 Times in 963 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Should the tax payer have to pay for ins for a child whose parents make $83K a ye
|
|
__________________
FOR THE LIKES OF LIBERALS LIKE KERRY AND DURBIN: "IF YOU CAN'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM." |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|