GottaHurt

Yep, according to this article, it was available October 24, 2000.

Paula Jones in Penthouse: Very Nude and Very Annoyed at the Far Right Business Wire - Find Articles

__________________
Pain can be such a beautiful thing

winston53660

Not exactly a publication of demure, passive sexulity I would say.

GottaHurt

Nice try...lol...

winston53660

Nice try what? She was willing to pose for a publication that publish's aggresive female sexuality. Big deal i could care less.

Iriemon

I don't recall any finding to that effect.

I recall Jones flat out losing her case on summary judgment, meaning the evidence that Clinton violated any law was so thin the judge threw it out without even letting a jury consider it. Clinton settled in part because it was cheaper than continued litigating.

As Jones stated in the Penthouse interview, her case was set up and manipulated by right wing and religious groups.

If you believe it is fair to make conclusions contrary to judicial findings, (or without them) I'll look for you to be on the "guilty" bandwagon next time there is an accusation of wrongdoing against US troops.

__________________
Matthew 5:9

GottaHurt

How convenient.

Hmmm, Jones the state employee, Clinton the multi-millionaire?

Innocent people don't settle, they clear their name.

How did they know Clinton forced himself on her? Seems to me she sought them out.

Ditto.

Iriemon

Clinton was no multi-millionaire at the time -- he was not born to wealth and grew up with very modest means and earned what he got.

If you want to refer to folks with the silver spoons in their mouths, look that the politician with the last name of "Bush".

Jones' lawsuit was supported by the religious right machine that wanted to take down Clinton, according to the Penthouse article.

Absolutely false statement.

I don't know.

Lerxst

All things considered, Clinton, like him or not, was probably one of the well read, intellectually commanding Presidents in the history of the Office. I have to admit, I admire the man. Despite all the hogwash the man was serious about combating terrorism. And despite the fact that the military didn't like him, he really did care about our troops. Drawing down and pouring money into technology doesn't mean "I hate the troops."

__________________
I was so right. And you? Well you were so wrong. You lost. Ha. Ha.

Simon W. Moon

The question remains open if we can provide any meaningful amelioration of what's coming.
Yeah, the original post is ... well, just plain ol' silly.

__________________
"That is the problem... [we] fell in love with the idea that politicians-- even the slickest and brightest presidential candidates-- were real heroes and truly exciting people. That is wrong on its face. They are mainly dull people with corrupt instincts and criminal children. -H.S.T"

Lerxst

I am cautious about buying into any "domino effect" argument regarding state governments or entire populations. We saw the folly of that kind of thinking at the beginning of the Cold War.