![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
R.I.P. Léo
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Seen: 03-14-10 05:28 AM
Location: CEE
Posts: 8,089
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 1,665 Times in 1,095 Posts
|
Good article about terrorism
Read this!
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/c...?story_id=3924 That's the kind of articles used by my teachers so I dare thinking it's not complete BS
|
|
__________________
===|:-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
R.I.P. Léo
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Seen: 03-14-10 05:28 AM
Location: CEE
Posts: 8,089
Thanks: 3,708
Thanked 1,665 Times in 1,095 Posts
|
Re: Good article about terrorism
Foreign Policy: The Terrorism Index
page 3 is very interresting. What do you think about that, GySgt? |
|
__________________
===|:-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Verifier
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Last Seen: 03-13-10 03:57 AM
Location: Your Back Yard
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 477
Thanked 163 Times in 133 Posts
Gender:
![]() |
Re: Good article about terrorism
The article reveals that many experts in the US believe that Pakistan is more of a worry than Iraq.
I have pointed out in prior posts that Pakistan has nuclear capabilities now. So if the US action in Iraq is having an adverse impact on the Western Influence in Pakistan, then the US action in Iraq, should perhpas be modified to have less adverse impact on the Western influence in Pakistan. Is anyone even surveying and projecting the influence of US actions in Iraq, on the Wastern influence in Pakistan. Let alone actually changing and tiloring US action in Iraq to optimize Western influence in Iraq. I have also pointed out in prior posts, that there is the objective the US wishes to achieve, and then there are teh unplanned, adverse consequences inadvertently harvested from the achievement of those objectives. Winning in Iraq may mean Losing in Pakistan. . |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|