| Archives Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro?; One thing I find perplexing is the continual bleeting blood lust for the neck of poor old Generallisimo Augusto Pinochet ... |
07-09-05, 07:33 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | User
Join Date: Jul 2005 Last Online: 07-10-05 11:57 AM
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Independent Gender:  | Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? One thing I find perplexing is the continual bleeting blood lust for the neck of poor old Generallisimo Augusto Pinochet but no similar feelings for El Commandante en Jefe, Fidel Castro. This is especially perplexing because Castro was and is the more oppressive of the two and because the fruits of Pinochet's regime certainly are far greater than those of Castro's.
Pray tell, can someone enlighten me?  |
| |
07-12-05, 09:34 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Professor
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 05-20-06 04:39 AM Location: NE, Minnesota
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gender:  | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Because Castro was a left-wing dictatorship, Pinochet right-wing. Pinochet killed the Socialist President Allende, took over had a poor human rights record and many more people became poorer. He was quite friendly to US businesses. Castro overthrew the US-backed Batista government which was really oppressive. And he made the gap between rich and poor closer.
Casto was better than Pinochet |
| |
07-15-05, 10:51 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 04-17-06 09:11 PM Location: NY
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Pinochet did not provide free health care, free education and make a 3rd world country as literate as the USA. Castro did. Castro did not kill aimlessly. And Pinochet was created by the United States, the United States did not try to assassinate him countless times.
__________________ Life is not an easy matter... You cannot live through it without falling into frustration and cynicism unless you have before you a great idea which raises you above personal misery, above weakness, above all kinds of perfidy and baseness. Leon Trotsky |
| |
07-23-05, 02:08 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Jun 2005 Last Online: 11-02-08 03:48 PM Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 446
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Conservative Gender:  | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Quote: |
Originally Posted by V.I. Lenin Pinochet did not provide free health care, free education and make a 3rd world country as literate as the USA. Castro did. Castro did not kill aimlessly. | Oh yeah, Cuba's great. I'll believe that when Floridians start escaping there on rafts. |
| |
07-23-05, 02:11 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 04-17-06 09:11 PM Location: NY
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Please tell me you know that more Cubans fled Cuba under Batista, an American backed capitalist dictator, then they have under Castro's reign?
I never said Cuba was heaven. But compare it to other Latin American countries and tell me how terrible it is. I'd chose Cuba over El Slavador or Argentenia anytime. |
| |
07-23-05, 08:33 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005 Last Online: 09-14-06 12:32 PM Location: UK
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Kissenger & the CIA brought about the overthrow of Allende in their support for a coup, even though Allende was the democratically elected president of Chile.
It's making an under statement to say... this was a hypocrytical thing for a so called 'pro democracy' country to have done.
One might ask, how is it such acts can be committed by a country that’s supposed to be ‘pro democracy’ ?
Could it be a combination of indifference, apathy, disbelief & blind ignorance on the part of the electorate. If so then such members of that electorate must share a common guilt, for to turn a blind eye to evil acts & do nothing is to participate in evil acts.
I’d now like to consider how it is that politicians in a democratic country could commit such acts, not be punished for those acts & even wind up with a Nobel peace prize at the end of it !
Lets take a look at a large proportion of the Americans here.
1) They don't believe the USA has demolished human rights & democracy in Chile, Guatemala, Nicaragua & elsewhere in the Americas & indeed the world.
2) If they do believe these things were done, they believe it was somehow done for the good of the people of those countries, the greater good of mankind & the free western world.
3) They don't care anyway that the US has done these things because the victims were non Americans, so as non Americans what the victims felt & what they thought & what they suffered simply doesn't matter.
4) It was part of the war on Communism, based on an imaginary Soviet threat in the Americas dreamed up by the 'lets unite in our hatred for a common enemy’ brigade who use the power of fear from phoney Soviet threat scares as a way to maintain the status quo of the mining interests of the US multi national corps that employed Chilean tin miners in slave like conditions. After all, they didn't want Allende's Unions after a fair deal for the guys that go down a dark dangerous hole all day & dig up tin.
5) Anyone that questions American atrocities & America meddling in other people’s countries, must be an anti American if they are a foreigner, or unpatriotic if they are American. Anyone that is either anti American or simply unpatriotic, must be deluded & what they say is worthless & untrue & uh let me see what else... uh well it's danged unpatriotic & danged un American.. that's enough isn't.
6) The circular argument that goes as follows.. Anyone that claims these things really happened must be a liberal & all liberals are not worth listening to because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to, because they say things that liberals say & what liberals say is not worth listening to… ad infinitum.
Can anyone tell me what is the difference between the following blind faiths ?
Blind faith 1) Being a proud American
Blind faith 2) Being a proud Muslim
Danged if I can tell the difference really.
Oh actually there is one... The Americans have killed even more people & messed even up more countries than the Muslims have in the last 100 years.
Last edited by robin : 07-23-05 at 08:42 PM.
|
| |
07-23-05, 08:42 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 04-17-06 09:11 PM Location: NY
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Robin.....I think I love you. |
| |
07-23-05, 08:45 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005 Last Online: 09-14-06 12:32 PM Location: UK
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Lenin
Well thanks, but sorry old chap I really can't reciprocate those feelings as I'm a moderate capitalist... but not a fascist though.
Oh I almost forgot...
7) Anyone that wants equitable conditions for employees, must be a goddam commie !
Last edited by robin : 07-23-05 at 08:49 PM.
|
| |
07-23-05, 08:48 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Advisor
Join Date: Apr 2005 Last Online: 04-17-06 09:11 PM Location: NY
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? Hah, aw. A broken heart....
The key is moderate capitalist. And I find, much to my comrades dismay, I'm becoming a capitalist myself. Well, not really, just less hard-edge socialist.
In the end, I love your view of America. I've yet to find a single born and bred American who feels the same way though. |
| |
07-23-05, 08:51 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005 Last Online: 09-14-06 12:32 PM Location: UK
Posts: 1,057
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative Gender: 
Current Mood: | Re: Why the anger over Pinochet but not over Castro? You mean you love my view of their view LOL
There are a few like Bill O'Rielly who doesn't see his country through rose coloured spectacles.
Good night 
Last edited by robin : 07-23-05 at 08:54 PM.
|
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |