• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

A woman's right to choose.

Your argument is deontological like every other puritanical dogmatist, eventhough you try to spin it as consquential.
But it is not consequential to the fetus, it is only consequential to you and your deontological reasons.

Our argument is consequentialism like every other pragmatic, antithetical, revisionist.
Click to expand...

Or to quote one of my favorite pragmatic, antithetical, revisionists, "The end justifies the means."
 
rhinefire said:
Clyde: "C,mon Bonnie let's do it."
Bonnie: "No way, not without a rubber."
Clyde:" So what if we create life, we'll just kill it. After all we are famous for killin'."
Bonnie: You're right Clyde, who gives a damn. Nothion like good sex and killin' to make our day."
Click to expand...

More histrionic drivel with no basis in reality. I bet you thought you were being clever though. :roll:
 
Re: Broken Records

Monk-Eye said:
"Broken Records"
First you repeated this immediately from above and no it is not the issue.

Your argument is deontological like every other puritanical dogmatist, eventhough you try to spin it as consquential.
But it is not consequential to the fetus, it is only consequential to you and your deontological reasons.

Our argument is consequentialism like every other pragmatic, antithetical, revisionist.

Deontologists (link) argue the rightness or wrongness of an action does not depend on the goodness or badness of its consequences.

Consequentialism (link) refers to those moral theories which hold that the consequences of a particular action form the basis for any valid moral judgment about that action.

Pragmatic Maxim (link) Pragmatism. The opinion that metaphysics is to be largely cleared up by the application of the following maxim for attaining clearness of apprehension: "Consider what effects, that might conceivably have practical bearings, we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then, our conception of these effects is the whole of our conception of the object. (Peirce, CP 5.2, 1878/1902).
Click to expand...

Why do you feel the need for so many large words that clutter your meanings. One gets the idea that your sitting around readin articles and stealing big words and clever sentences from them and mangling them so that they make absolutely no sense. It doesn't matter to the fetus? Let him grow and then ask him if he minds being killed. Your simply saying hes not aware of the murder, neither would a 1 year old if I gave him a lethal shot of heroin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom