Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision; Originally Posted by nikitas3.com The Flying Imams set up this whole thing intentionally (obviously), in order to bring it ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-07, 10:46 PM   #41 (permalink)
Doctor of Metaphysics


 
dclxvinoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Today 01:24 AM
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,402
Thanks: 334
Thanked 632 Times in 387 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikitas3.com View Post
The Flying Imams set up this whole thing intentionally (obviously), in order to bring it to this point, with the aid of the Democrat party, of course, those folks who do not believe there are even terrorists in the world. In fact what is happening is... racial profiling in reverse! Here is how it works: Grandma, in her wheelchair, is pulled out of airport line and strip-searched. This is to show that we are not "profiling" terrorists. But this act is the most balant form of racial profiling since 9/11. Liberals actually have devised a paranoid, paralell universe under which the least threatening among us (little old lady in a wheelchair) is profiled as the most, while the most threatening among us (Middle Eastern males in their 20s, imams muttering anti-American remarks) are given a wink and a nod and pro bono representation by anti-American trial lawyers. Now with the Flying Imam case possibly dragging suspicious passengers into court, these trial lawyers have found a new way to harass the good people of America by muzzling them (racially profiling them) while the Muttering Imams become the judges and prosecutors.
Please visit welcome to nikitas for more common sense.
Let's all shed a tear for those poor discriminated white old people who get pulled out of airport lines. Give me a break.
dclxvinoise is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 07-20-07, 10:48 PM   #42 (permalink)
Doctor of Metaphysics


 
dclxvinoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Today 01:24 AM
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,402
Thanks: 334
Thanked 632 Times in 387 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimBabUB View Post
Apparantly there is no appreciation from the leftist/commie/dims of this country that we are NOT rounding up every middle eastern looking person and putting them in a camp like we did during WWII. Where is the Kudos for America that we have progressed past that point of our history? We never get Kudos for amending our past, now do we? We never get a pat on the back while people of other countries that go backwards get all of the sympathy? Why is that?
So the government deserves a pat on the back for not making racist moronic mistakes like they did in the past?
dclxvinoise is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-20-07, 11:22 PM   #43 (permalink)
Corporate Drone


 
chevydriver1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Today 12:23 AM
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 3,372
Thanks: 354
Thanked 474 Times in 337 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

You people do realize that this so-called tattle tale system can be abused to the highest extent right?
__________________
My political blog; http://libertarianblue.blogspot.com/


__________________
chevydriver1123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-20-07, 11:31 PM   #44 (permalink)
Banned
May True Debate Winner
 
Trajan Octavian Titus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Online: 03-05-08 06:10 AM
Location: We can't stop here this is bat country!
Posts: 20,984
Thanks: 169
Thanked 564 Times in 481 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sneaky
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydriver1123 View Post
You people do realize that this so-called tattle tale system can be abused to the highest extent right?
You do realize that the average citizen is the first line of defense in the WoT right? People should not have to worry about being sued for reporting suspicous behavior.
Trajan Octavian Titus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-20-07, 11:38 PM   #45 (permalink)
Corporate Drone


 
chevydriver1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Today 12:23 AM
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 3,372
Thanks: 354
Thanked 474 Times in 337 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus View Post
You do realize that the average citizen is the first line of defense in the WoT right? People should not have to worry about being sued for reporting suspicous behavior.
and when the supposed threat turns out to bs then what. Doesnt the said person who's life was destroyed by the false information and said "reporter" have any recourse against the liar? If someone had anti-Bush sticker and some putz tells a cop that the person with the anti-bush sticker is a terrorist without any real proof thats ok?
chevydriver1123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-20-07, 11:44 PM   #46 (permalink)
Banned
May True Debate Winner
 
Trajan Octavian Titus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Online: 03-05-08 06:10 AM
Location: We can't stop here this is bat country!
Posts: 20,984
Thanks: 169
Thanked 564 Times in 481 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sneaky
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydriver1123 View Post
and when the supposed threat turns out to bs then what. Doesnt the said person who's life was destroyed by the false information and said "reporter" have any recourse against the liar? If someone had anti-Bush sticker and some putz tells a cop that the person with the anti-bush sticker is a terrorist without any real proof thats ok?
Somebody saying they think someone's a terrorist may prompt an investigation but it certainly won't destroy that persons life unless ofcoarse that person really is a terrorist.
Trajan Octavian Titus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-20-07, 11:46 PM   #47 (permalink)
ROCK AND ROLL MASTER
Mod team member

 
galenrox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Last Online: 09-11-08 12:21 AM
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 11,296
Thanks: 533
Thanked 1,080 Times in 761 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 

Current Mood:
Mellow
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus View Post
Somebody saying they think someone's a terrorist may prompt an investigation but it certainly won't destroy that persons life unless ofcoarse that person really is a terrorist.
Depends on how you define "ruin", cause it'll definitely enable the cops to **** with their **** pretty royally, and even make it so the cops seem accountable if they don't **** with their ****.
__________________
"Men cannot escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others."
- Theodore Roosevelt
galenrox is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-20-07, 11:57 PM   #48 (permalink)
Banned
May True Debate Winner
 
Trajan Octavian Titus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Online: 03-05-08 06:10 AM
Location: We can't stop here this is bat country!
Posts: 20,984
Thanks: 169
Thanked 564 Times in 481 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sneaky
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by galenrox View Post
Depends on how you define "ruin", cause it'll definitely enable the cops to **** with their **** pretty royally, and even make it so the cops seem accountable if they don't **** with their ****.
I seriuosly doubt that a report of suspicious activity is going to prompt that type of investigation unless some sort of corrobration is discovered from the outset like with the Fort Dixx case where the Circuit City employee reported them to the F.B.I. now if that kid had been wrong do you think he should be able to be sued for reporting a legiitmate concern?
Trajan Octavian Titus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-21-07, 12:02 AM   #49 (permalink)
Corporate Drone


 
chevydriver1123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Online: Today 12:23 AM
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 3,372
Thanks: 354
Thanked 474 Times in 337 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Cynical
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus View Post
Somebody saying they think someone's a terrorist may prompt an investigation but it certainly won't destroy that persons life unless ofcoarse that person really is a terrorist.
Care to explain to me how one would explain to his or her boss on why they havent been to work in the last few days because of the result of some *******s' bs claim.
chevydriver1123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 07-21-07, 12:04 AM   #50 (permalink)
Banned
May True Debate Winner
 
Trajan Octavian Titus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Online: 03-05-08 06:10 AM
Location: We can't stop here this is bat country!
Posts: 20,984
Thanks: 169
Thanked 564 Times in 481 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Sneaky
Re: Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydriver1123 View Post
Care to explain to me how one would explain to his or her boss on why they havent been to work in the last few days because of the result of some *******s' bs claim.
Why would it have kept them from going to work?
Trajan Octavian Titus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by JustineCredible
· · ·
Member Galleries
988 photos
217 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO