Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision - Page 3

PrimBabUB · 07-20-07, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galenrox

I'm really torn on this issue. For one, such a law would enable a lot of abuses of freedom, and would allow people to vindictively abuse government resources in order to screw with people for whatever reason. On the other hand, if such things aren't allowed we all know that some dickhead liberal lawyer will start suing good Americans who saw something that was legitimately suspicious, which will have the larger effect that it will disincentivise the sharing of information between the government and its citizens.

So yeah, ****ed if I know

Apparantly there is no appreciation from the leftist/commie/dims of this country that we are NOT rounding up every middle eastern looking person and putting them in a camp like we did during WWII. Where is the Kudos for America that we have progressed past that point of our history? We never get Kudos for amending our past, now do we? We never get a pat on the back while people of other countries that go backwards get all of the sympathy? Why is that?

PrimBabUB · 07-20-07, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikitas3.com

The Flying Imams set up this whole thing intentionally (obviously), in order to bring it to this point, with the aid of the Democrat party, of course, those folks who do not believe there are even terrorists in the world. In fact what is happening is... racial profiling in reverse! Here is how it works: Grandma, in her wheelchair, is pulled out of airport line and strip-searched. This is to show that we are not "profiling" terrorists. But this act is the most balant form of racial profiling since 9/11. Liberals actually have devised a paranoid, paralell universe under which the least threatening among us (little old lady in a wheelchair) is profiled as the most, while the most threatening among us (Middle Eastern males in their 20s, imams muttering anti-American remarks) are given a wink and a nod and pro bono representation by anti-American trial lawyers. Now with the Flying Imam case possibly dragging suspicious passengers into court, these trial lawyers have found a new way to harass the good people of America by muzzling them (racially profiling them) while the Muttering Imams become the judges and prosecutors.
Please visit welcome to nikitas for more common sense.

Quote:

Liberals actually have devised a paranoid, paralell universe under which the least threatening among us (little old lady in a wheelchair) is profiled as the most, while the most threatening among us (Middle Eastern males in their 20s, imams muttering anti-American remarks) are given a wink and a nod and pro bono representation by anti-American trial lawyers.

I call it Bizarro World.

Just think what it will be like if John Edwards would end up as president.

Hatuey · 07-20-07, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrimBabUB

Well, if Michael Moore can yell whatever bull **** he wants anytime he wishes at anyone even if the accusations have no merit without consequence AND make money without being sued then the rest of us should be able to do the same. Don't you think?

Michael Moore talking **** about you won't bring Federal Agents to your front door. Next.

Hatuey · 07-20-07, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus

edit: I meant "vigilant"

The Freudian Slip Shows.

Hatuey · 07-20-07, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikitas3.com

The Flying Imams set up this whole thing intentionally (obviously), in order to bring it to this point, with the aid of the Democrat party, of course, those folks who do not believe there are even terrorists in the world. In fact what is happening is... racial profiling in reverse! Here is how it works: Grandma, in her wheelchair, is pulled out of airport line and strip-searched. This is to show that we are not "profiling" terrorists. But this act is the most balant form of racial profiling since 9/11. Liberals actually have devised a paranoid, paralell universe under which the least threatening among us (little old lady in a wheelchair) is profiled as the most, while the most threatening among us (Middle Eastern males in their 20s, imams muttering anti-American remarks) are given a wink and a nod and pro bono representation by anti-American trial lawyers. Now with the Flying Imam case possibly dragging suspicious passengers into court, these trial lawyers have found a new way to harass the good people of America by muzzling them (racially profiling them) while the Muttering Imams become the judges and prosecutors.
Please visit welcome to nikitas for more common sense.

- The Flying Imams set this whole thing up? Prove it.

- What grandmother has been strip searched? Source?

=======

If you want to advertise your website - go read our rules.

Trajan Octavian Titus · 07-20-07, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatuey

Michael Moore talking **** about you won't bring Federal Agents to your front door. Next.

You think that Citizens who report suspicous activity should have to fear lawsuits?

PrimBabUB · 07-20-07, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatuey

Michael Moore talking **** about you won't bring Federal Agents to your front door. Next.

Nice try to avoid answering the question, whimp.

PrimBabUB · 07-20-07, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatuey

- The Flying Imams set this whole thing up? Prove it.

- What grandmother has been strip searched? Source?

=======

If you want to advertise your website - go read our rules.

Any dhimm wit in the world can see what's going on, except for you. I guess that makes you an exceptional dhimm wit.

The silenced majority · 07-20-07, 07:46 PM

Let's not forget why 9/11 happened. I'm not talking about the motivations for the terrorists that and talk like that which is debated ad nausea on forums like these; I feel both sides of that issue have valid points.

I'm talking about how the terrorist act of 9/11/2001 was pulled off so easily. We've now spent billions of dollars on a war, when the first shot was fired with a box-cutter. IMO, 9/11 happened because of a climate of tort abuse and Political Correctness. Political Correctness backed by corrupt lawyers who take on cases like the flying Imams have this country so crippled and the people completely unable to discriminate rationally. It's what prevented the screeners from stopping the 19 hijackers on 9-11. I'm not suggesting that outright discrimination of Arabic looking people is the solution, I'm not suggesting that looking at our current world with psychological blinders on is a good idea either. People need to rationally look for ways to prevent a disaster like 9-11 from be carried out again.

I can only conclude that those who supported the ridiculous pulling of this provision must be eager to see it happen again.

galenrox · 07-20-07, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The silenced majority

Let's not forget why 9/11 happened. I'm not talking about the motivations for the terrorists that and talk like that which is debated ad nausea on forums like these; I feel both sides of that issue have valid points.

I'm talking about how the terrorist act of 9/11/2001 was pulled off so easily. We've now spent billions of dollars on a war, when the first shot was fired with a box-cutter. IMO, 9/11 happened because of a climate of tort abuse and Political Correctness. Political Correctness backed by corrupt lawyers who take on cases like the flying Imams have this country so crippled and the people completely unable to discriminate rationally. It's what prevented the screeners from stopping the 19 hijackers on 9-11. I'm not suggesting that outright discrimination of Arabic looking people is the solution, I'm not suggesting that looking at our current world with psychological blinders on is a good idea either. People need to rationally look for ways to prevent a disaster like 9-11 from be carried out again.

I can only conclude that those who supported the ridiculous pulling of this provision must be eager to see it happen again.

And I completely agree with this sentiment, but you have to see the other side of it. We are better than our enemy for a number of reasons, but one of them is we're not a bunch of dickheads to blindly screw people over because they don't look or act how we arbitrarily want them to. Yeah, I don't worry about you and how you'd handle the ability to report suspicious activity, but I am certain that you and I both know the type of ignorant hicks who see a couple arabs speaking arabic while having a meal and will call the FBI, and the implication of such a law is that those people who end up getting consistently dicked around because of stupid mother****ers who don't understand that speaking arabic is not sufficient reason to suspect someone of being a terrorist.