Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-07, 05:47 PM   #1
Professor

 
OKgrannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Seen: Today 06:48 PM
Posts: 1,965
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 830 Times in 522 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Female
Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Legislators don't care about the financial hardship imposed on women by unexpected pregnancy/childbirth, but when it comes to the states' money it's a different story.

Anti-abortion bill is halted | Dallas Morning News | News for Dallas, Texas | Texas Southwest

Quote:
AUSTIN – A stiff anti-abortion bill is probably gone for the legislative session, dragged down partly by a budget analysis that showed outlawing all abortions would cost the state more than $400 million in health care costs over the next three years.

The bill by Rep. Warren Chisum, R-Pampa, would trigger an abortion ban if the U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Roe vs. Wade. Under such circumstances, the measure calls for making abortion in all instances – except to prevent the death of the mother – a felony in Texas.

"It got hung on a bad vote in committee," said Mr. Chisum, adding that the fiscal analysis attached to it didn't help.

The cost from ending abortions in Texas would come from an estimated 63,000 more births, of which 67 percent are likely to be supported by Medicaid, according to projections from the nonpartisan Legislative Budget Board.

Based on current abortion rates of about 78,000 a year, the board estimated that if abortion were illegal, 20 percent of women would go to a state where the procedure was legal. The remainder, based on projections, would carry their pregnancy to term and require medical and social support
__________________
" All of women's aspirations, whether for education, work or any form of self-determination, ultimately rest on their ability to decide whether and when to bear children." Susan Faludi author of "Backlush"
OKgrannie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-18-07, 06:35 PM   #2
Educator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Seen: 10-06-09 11:02 AM
Posts: 962
Thanks: 48
Thanked 202 Times in 138 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OKgrannie View Post
Legislators don't care about the financial hardship imposed on women by unexpected pregnancy/childbirth, but when it comes to the states' money it's a different story.

Anti-abortion bill is halted | Dallas Morning News | News for Dallas, Texas | Texas Southwest
How can making abortions illegal cost the state more from additional births? Making the abortions illegal doesn't reduce the number of abortions, remember? Where are all these extra births coming from then?
Cremaster77 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-18-07, 07:24 PM   #3
Professor

 
OKgrannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Seen: Today 06:48 PM
Posts: 1,965
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 830 Times in 522 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Female
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cremaster77 View Post
How can making abortions illegal cost the state more from additional births? Making the abortions illegal doesn't reduce the number of abortions, remember? Where are all these extra births coming from then?

Making abortions illegal doesn't change the numbers, but it might change the demographics of the women getting them. Women with money will continue to get safe legal abortions elsewhere, note the article said 20% estimated would travel elsewhere for abortions, I suspect the percentage would be higher. Women without money to travel, or who are unable to take time off from work will either look for illegal abortions or be forced to give birth. If they don't have the money for abortions, they sure don't have the money to rear a child.

Aren't you the least offended that legislators are pro-life only until the financial realities emerge?
__________________
" All of women's aspirations, whether for education, work or any form of self-determination, ultimately rest on their ability to decide whether and when to bear children." Susan Faludi author of "Backlush"
OKgrannie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-19-07, 08:36 AM   #4
Educator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Seen: 10-06-09 11:02 AM
Posts: 962
Thanks: 48
Thanked 202 Times in 138 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OKgrannie View Post
Making abortions illegal doesn't change the numbers, but it might change the demographics of the women getting them. Women with money will continue to get safe legal abortions elsewhere, note the article said 20% estimated would travel elsewhere for abortions, I suspect the percentage would be higher. Women without money to travel, or who are unable to take time off from work will either look for illegal abortions or be forced to give birth. If they don't have the money for abortions, they sure don't have the money to rear a child.

Aren't you the least offended that legislators are pro-life only until the financial realities emerge?
You're grasping at straws here regarding the number of abortions not changing. The article that you yourself posted shows that making abortions illegal would result in 10's of thousands of additional births. Saying that it's just the demographics that change is a crock. In order for demographics to account for these additional births while actually not preventing abortions, it would mean that there are an equal number of women with money who are currently NOT getting abortions when they abortions are legal who are only deciding to get abortions for which they have to travel out of state once they are illegal. That is the only way that out-of-state abortions would offset the additional births this study showed so that the total number of abortions remains the same. By posting this article, you refuted one of the key points you've been trying to make since you've been posting here.

And I do find it offensive the legislators are so easily pushed off of their pro-life stance. But that's an easy point without need for much discussion. The more important point of this article is that it shows that making abortions illegal prevents abortions. Imagine that.
Cremaster77 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-19-07, 09:36 AM   #5
Goddess of Bacon

 
rivrrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Last Seen: Today 07:40 PM
Posts: 9,897
Thanks: 2,764
Thanked 4,077 Times in 2,359 Posts
Gender: Female
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cremaster77 View Post
And I do find it offensive the legislators are so easily pushed off of their pro-life stance. But that's an easy point without need for much discussion. The more important point of this article is that it shows that making abortions illegal prevents abortions. Imagine that.
Making abortion illegal prevents women from being able to make safe decisions about their own bodies, and puts additional hardship on the rest of society. Imagine that.
__________________


The point to remember is that what the government gives it must first take away. ~John S. Coleman
rivrrat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-19-07, 10:08 AM   #6
Educator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Seen: 10-06-09 11:02 AM
Posts: 962
Thanks: 48
Thanked 202 Times in 138 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
Making abortion illegal prevents women from being able to make safe decisions about their own bodies, and puts additional hardship on the rest of society. Imagine that.
That's a fair argument and one we can have, but it's a completely different topic. OKGrannie and others on this board have repeatedly argued that making abortions illegal would not reduce the number of abortions as everyone who wants an abortion would get one illegally anyway. If that's the case, where are all these extra costs coming from?
Cremaster77 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-19-07, 10:09 AM   #7
Banned

 
talloulou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Last Seen: 02-12-10 11:13 AM
Location: Tiamat's better half
Posts: 15,998
Thanks: 2,995
Thanked 3,999 Times in 2,587 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Female

Tavern Bartender Veteran:  Thank you. Veteran Moderator:  Thank you for all your contributions to DebatePolitics! 
Total Awards: 2

Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OKgrannie View Post
Legislators don't care about the financial hardship imposed on women by unexpected pregnancy/childbirth, but when it comes to the states' money it's a different story.
You're right. In fact none of the states have programs in place to help poverty stricken mothers and children and none of them have additional programs in place to aid the single mother who while not living in poverty could use some help. None of them, right??

There's nothing worse than liars. They're impossible to debate because they aren't grounded in reality.
talloulou is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-19-07, 10:44 AM   #8
Professor

 
OKgrannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Seen: Today 06:48 PM
Posts: 1,965
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 830 Times in 522 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Female
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cremaster77 View Post
You're grasping at straws here regarding the number of abortions not changing. The article that you yourself posted shows that making abortions illegal would result in 10's of thousands of additional births. Saying that it's just the demographics that change is a crock. In order for demographics to account for these additional births while actually not preventing abortions, it would mean that there are an equal number of women with money who are currently NOT getting abortions when they abortions are legal who are only deciding to get abortions for which they have to travel out of state once they are illegal. That is the only way that out-of-state abortions would offset the additional births this study showed so that the total number of abortions remains the same. By posting this article, you refuted one of the key points you've been trying to make since you've been posting here.

And I do find it offensive the legislators are so easily pushed off of their pro-life stance. But that's an easy point without need for much discussion. The more important point of this article is that it shows that making abortions illegal prevents abortions. Imagine that.
May I point out that it is the legislators' estimates of the number of increase in births, and legislators' belief in the outcome of their passing laws is often off the mark. It is commonly known that legislators believe that the mere act of passing a law changes the actions of the populace. Perhaps you are too young to remember when legislators changed speed limits to 55mph in order to save gasoline; I will remind you that very few obeyed the speed limits. Kind of like prohibition of which you might have heard.


One only needs to look at Latin America where abortion is criminal to see what effect criminalizing abortion has on abortion rates.
The Mahablog » Control
__________________
" All of women's aspirations, whether for education, work or any form of self-determination, ultimately rest on their ability to decide whether and when to bear children." Susan Faludi author of "Backlush"
OKgrannie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-23-07, 07:33 PM   #9
nes
Advisor
 
nes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Last Seen: 10-05-07 09:43 PM
Posts: 382
Thanks: 10
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by OKgrannie View Post
May I point out that it is the legislators' estimates of the number of increase in births, and legislators' belief in the outcome of their passing laws is often off the mark. It is commonly known that legislators believe that the mere act of passing a law changes the actions of the populace. Perhaps you are too young to remember when legislators changed speed limits to 55mph in order to save gasoline; I will remind you that very few obeyed the speed limits. Kind of like prohibition of which you might have heard.

Your comparing apples with oranges, people don't obey laws that are punishable by a fine and are rarely enforced, but people do tend to obey laws that carry harsh jail sentences and are commonly investigated by law enforcements.

Ever had someone call 911 because you were going over the speed limit?
nes is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 06-23-07, 08:05 PM   #10
Professor

 
OKgrannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Seen: Today 06:48 PM
Posts: 1,965
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 830 Times in 522 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Female
Re: Legislators pro-life until it costs money...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nes View Post
Your comparing apples with oranges, people don't obey laws that are punishable by a fine and are rarely enforced, but people do tend to obey laws that carry harsh jail sentences and are commonly investigated by law enforcements.

Ever had someone call 911 because you were going over the speed limit?
So you're suggesting harsh jail sentences for women who have abortions? How many years, and how harsh? What punishment for the person doing the abortion? What punishment for the father?

Actually, people tend to obey laws when they think they might be caught. It's a safe bet that women don't believe they will be caught having abortions. They may use herbs or medicinal abortion. They will go out of the country if they can afford it.

How much more jail space do you think will be needed? How much more manpower to enforce the law? What will be the total cost to enforce the anti-abortion law? Will we have officers to supervise monthly pregnancy tests for all women of childbearing age? How far are you willing to go violating women's civil rights to enforce this ban?
__________________
" All of women's aspirations, whether for education, work or any form of self-determination, ultimately rest on their ability to decide whether and when to bear children." Susan Faludi author of "Backlush"
OKgrannie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts