• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran

Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

*edit* Sorry admins, it's "Covert Action", not "Covert Against", sorry for the mislabel.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

Wow.... does no one seriously see the PROBLEM with this? We have 200 odd posts on how the best Republican candidate (in my opinion) SUCKS, and yet we could VERY WELL go to war with Iran over stuff like this... and no one cares or has an opinion?

I knew America was beginning to overlook and not care about important things anymore, but wow... just wow....
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

By "covert" you mean secret. Like Bush and his cabinet don't know WTF is going on as usual.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

If anyone doubted that ABC was a traitorous liberal news organization those doubts should be gone with this story.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

I think that people today have used the words "traitor", traitous", empeach, unpatriotic, etc to the pont where they don't mean dick any longer.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

Kasmos said:
Wow.... does no one seriously see the PROBLEM with this? We have 200 odd posts on how the best Republican candidate (in my opinion) SUCKS, and yet we could VERY WELL go to war with Iran over stuff like this... and no one cares or has an opinion?

I knew America was beginning to overlook and not care about important things anymore, but wow... just wow....
Click to expand...

We're already at war with Iran. They're doing their part in Iraq, and with their proxy arm, Hezbollah. American military is 90% surrounding Iran and all signs point to a larger conflict.

Both sides have done enough posturing and I think it's just a matter of time before the skirmishes and secret ops lead to an open war.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

jamesrage said:
If anyone doubted that ABC was a traitorous liberal news organization those doubts should be gone with this story.
Click to expand...

Oh give it a rest. ABC told the White House several times last week that they were going to run this story, and asked them each time if there was going to be any problem. The White House did not object. Add to that the fact that Bush requested 75 million extra last year for the purpose of "destabilizing" the government of Iraq, and your little hissy fit here is seen for what it is - More parroting of the talking heads at the FOX Noise Channel. Nothing more. Of course, if ABC is a traitor, then so is the president.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

Inuyasha said:
I think that people today have used the words "traitor", traitous", empeach, unpatriotic, etc to the pont where they don't mean dick any longer.
Click to expand...

You don't think revealing a covert operation to our enemies to be an act of treason?
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

danarhea said:
Oh give it a rest. ABC told the White House several times last week that they were going to run this story, and asked them each time if there was going to be any problem. The White House did not object.
Click to expand...
How on earth is something supposed to be covert if the whole world knows about it?Who exactly did they ask if it was cool to reveal a covert operation to the whole entire world including Iran?
Add to that the fact that Bush requested 75 million extra last year for the purpose of "destabilizing" the government of Iraq,
Click to expand...

Do you mean Iran?Have liberal rats so crippled our country that money for covert operations has to be asked for out in the open for our enemies to see?

and your little hissy fit here is seen for what it is - More parroting of the talking heads at the FOX Noise Channel.
Click to expand...

I do not get Fox news channel.As much as the liberals and fake conservatives talk **** about Fox news it must be a really good news source.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

jamesrage said:
How on earth is something supposed to be covert if the whole world knows about it?Who exactly did they ask if it was cool to reveal a covert operation to the whole entire world including Iran?


Do you mean Iran?Have liberal rats so crippled our country that money for covert operations has to be asked for out in the open for our enemies to see?



I do not get Fox news channel.As much as the liberals and fake conservatives talk **** about Fox news it must be a really good news source.
Click to expand...

I noticed you missed my last point, that if ABC is a traitor, so is the president. Dont forget that Bush spilled the beans last year when he asked for that extra 75 million.

As for who the fake Conservative is, if you are not supporting Ron Paul, then you are supporting one of the RINOs, and that makes YOU the fake Conservative.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

jamesrage said:
You don't think revealing a covert operation to our enemies to be an act of treason?
Click to expand...

It would depend on the covert operation.

If, as a hypothetical example, if the covert op was to assassinate people who wouldn't vote for the president in question next election, it would need to be revealed.

In this case, however, it appears that no covert op was revealed, just the intent to initiate covert ops. It also appears (from danarhea's post) that the White House was aware of the story, and had no problem with it, most likely because such an action would be the obvious choice, and Iran would expect it. Which means a story claiming that such was the case would seem to have no detrimental effect on operations.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

VTA said:
We're already at war with Iran. They're doing their part in Iraq, and with their proxy arm, Hezbollah. American military is 90% surrounding Iran and all signs point to a larger conflict.

Both sides have done enough posturing and I think it's just a matter of time before the skirmishes and secret ops lead to an open war.
Click to expand...
I'm praying that Bush does not fuc& us all and start another war! Hopefully he will be out of office before he blows us all up.

For the life of me I cannot understand how Bush thinks. Surely he cannot be this stupid? If we, for the sake of argument say Bush is not that dumb then what is his real agenda?

Are there financial gains to be made in his warped little mind by conquering Iran? What is he doing?
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

jamesrage said:
Do you mean Iran?Have liberal rats so crippled our country that money for covert operations has to be asked for out in the open for our enemies to see?
Click to expand...
Liberal rats oh raging one? That money was allocated during the 109th Congress....remember they're the one that was Republican controlled?

Your unbridled raging is a joy to watch with it's totally out of touch with reality bend. :rofl
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

The Mark said:
It would depend on the covert operation.

If, as a hypothetical example, if the covert op was to assassinate people who wouldn't vote for the president in question next election, it would need to be revealed.

In this case, however, it appears that no covert op was revealed, just the intent to initiate covert ops. It also appears (from danarhea's post) that the White House was aware of the story, and had no problem with it, most likely because such an action would be the obvious choice, and Iran would expect it.
Click to expand...

I wonder if danarhea actually has a video of ABC asking the white house if it was cool tell Iran that we plan on having covert missions in Iran.An American media outlet should have the decency to not tell our enemies any future military plans or covert missions regardless if someone says it is alright or not.

Which means a story claiming that such was the case would seem to have no detrimental effect on operations.
Click to expand...

It might hinder the American's ability to run a covert ops mission in Iran and cause Iran to detain any Americans who tries to visit their relatives in Iran .
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

26 X World Champs said:
I'm praying that Bush does not fuc& us all and start another war! Hopefully he will be out of office before he blows us all up.

For the life of me I cannot understand how Bush thinks. Surely he cannot be this stupid? If we, for the sake of argument say Bush is not that dumb then what is his real agenda?

Are there financial gains to be made in his warped little mind by conquering Iran? What is he doing?
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure it transcends Bush. America didn't spend billions to have it's military surround Iran for show. The whole strategy seems to have been to put to the squeez on Iran. Iraq, Afghanistan, both border Iran, as well as Azerbajian (sp?) where America has a military presence, the Gulf, etc.
 
Another step in Bush trying to provoke Iran into war. With the ongoing Iraq quagmire a continuing disaster; my guess is the Bush folks figure if they can covertly provoke Iran into a military action they'd regain some support in the polls.

The bigger question is whether these covert acts amount to a military action against Iran that has not been authorized by Congress.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

jamesrage said:
You don't think revealing a covert operation to our enemies to be an act of treason?
Click to expand...


This was my statement:
Originally Posted by Inuyasha
I think that people today have used the words "traitor", traitous", empeach, unpatriotic, etc to the pont where they don't mean dick any longer.

That is called a general statement:
A statement, principle, or fact that embraces or is applicable to the whole.


As opposed to a spacific statement:
A statement, principle or fact concerned particularly with the subject specified.

If that is not clear please see:
School of Continuing Studies
 
Iriemon said:
Another step in Bush trying to provoke Iran into war. With the ongoing Iraq quagmire a continuing disaster; my guess is the Bush folks figure if they can covertly provoke Iran into a military action they'd regain some support in the polls.

The bigger question is whether these covert acts amount to a military action against Iran that has not been authorized by Congress.
Click to expand...

There are 2 objectives in this action:
1) To scare the american people to empty up their pockets even more......
2) To scare the american people to empty up their pockets even more......

With a tremedous american financial woes back home for the average american, the government truly doesn't care because their big business buddies would surely give them a cut. Congress included of course.....its just a dog and pony show......maybe elephant and donkeys too.....
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

Kasmos said:
Wow.... does no one seriously see the PROBLEM with this? We have 200 odd posts on how the best Republican candidate (in my opinion) SUCKS, and yet we could VERY WELL go to war with Iran over stuff like this... and no one cares or has an opinion?

I knew America was beginning to overlook and not care about important things anymore, but wow... just wow....
Click to expand...


Until you absolute proof of that what you're saying is correct, your post is merely unsubstantiated speculation.

:)
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

danarhea said:
I noticed you missed my last point, that if ABC is a traitor, so is the president. Dont forget that Bush spilled the beans last year when he asked for that extra 75 million.

As for who the fake Conservative is, if you are not supporting Ron Paul, then you are supporting one of the RINOs, and that makes YOU the fake Conservative.
Click to expand...

I agree that we need to keep the RINOs out of politics and that Dick Cheney is a Halliburton puppet scumbag; however, I do not know enough about Ron Paul to vote for him.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

Kasmos said:
Wow.... does no one seriously see the PROBLEM with this? We have 200 odd posts on how the best Republican candidate (in my opinion) SUCKS, and yet we could VERY WELL go to war with Iran over stuff like this... and no one cares or has an opinion?

I knew America was beginning to overlook and not care about important things anymore, but wow... just wow....
Click to expand...

There is currently no real evidence that any such operation is set to take place. If it actually does take place, it's not necessarily thing because Iran is a rogue terrorist state that has repeatedly defied the U.N. and that IAEC so many times that there really are only two options: (1) reduce Iran to rubble; or (2) destabilize the the current regime and help the Iranian people elect a non-terrorist government. (And hopefully execute the Mullahs, the president of Iran, and they Ayetoiletbowl.)

Iran's current government has chosen to embrace a terrorist philosophy and they have chosen to supply weapons to terrorists in Lebanon and Palestine; therefore, I have no objection to removing them from power.

For the record, the Chinese will not object because it means they will get oil cheaper and the Russians will collect what the lying Iranian scumbags owe them and go on their way.

DOWN WITH IRAN!!!!
DOWN WITH THE AYETIOLETBOWL!!!!!
DOWN WITH THE MULLAHS!!!!!!
DOWN WITH TERRORISM!!!!!!! (No, Billo, helping the Iranian people remove their terrorist leaders does not make US terrorists.)

:shock:
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

Inuyasha said:
By "covert" you mean secret. Like Bush and his cabinet don't know WTF is going on as usual.
Click to expand...

Well why don't we just put the National Security Council meetings up on the internet so we can all watch them? And let's let the people decide where to send the covert agents, we could livestream a debate.

But first I guess we all need passwords so the terrorist don't listen in, wouldn't want that would we.
 
Re: Bush Authorizes New Covert Against Against Iran

Vader said:
For the record, the Chinese will not object because it means they will get oil cheaper and the Russians will collect what the lying Iranian scumbags owe them and go on their way.
[/SIZE]
Click to expand...

Did you say oil, that is one of the major factors why we are in the middle east. Why do you think we invaded Iraq, for its people? Of course not its for our people to get the oil out. If ever the oil runs out of the region, you will finally hear that the middle east is not a strategic place for american forces to be in.

About the russians, we also pay them large sums of money so that they would not sell thier nuclear materials to other countries.

Everyone is asking others not to pursue nuclear weaponry, however no one is asking anyone to get rid of thier nuclear arsenals, hmmmmmm a double standard. This is why people are pursuing this technology to even up the policies. Only one nation ever used a nuclear device on civilians in the history of the earth. We did it twice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom