Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says; U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says (CNN) -- An estimated 2 million babies die ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-07, 02:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
la cholita gringa

 
1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Today 12:43 AM
Posts: 13,421
Thanks: 4,050
Thanked 2,261 Times in 1,658 Posts

Awards:
Asshat of the year:  Winner of the Debate Politics 2008 Asshat of the Year Award. Congratulations! Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Current Mood:
Sunshine
U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says

U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says

(CNN) -- An estimated 2 million babies die within their first 24 hours each year worldwide and the United States has the second worst newborn mortality rate in the developed world, according to a new report.

American babies are three times more likely to die in their first month as children born in Japan, and newborn mortality is 2.5 times higher in the United States than in Finland, Iceland or Norway, Save the Children researchers found.

Only Latvia, with six deaths per 1,000 live births, has a higher death rate for newborns than the United States, which is tied near the bottom of industrialized nations with Hungary, Malta, Poland and Slovakia with five deaths per 1,000 births.

"The United States has more neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds per person than Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, but its newborn rate is higher than any of those countries," said the annual State of the World's Mothers report.

The report, which analyzed data from governments, research institutions and international agencies, found higher newborn death rates among U.S. minorities and disadvantaged groups. For African-Americans, the mortality rate is nearly double that of the United States as a whole, with 9.3 deaths per 1,000 births.

Sub-Saharan Africa remains the worst place in the world to be a mother or child, with Scandinavian nations again taking the top spots in the rankings by the Connecticut-based humanitarian group.

Sweden heads the list, with Niger last. (10 worst and best)

The "Mothers' Index" in the report ranks 125 nations according to 10 gauges of well-being -- six for mothers and four for children -- including objective measures such as lifetime mortality risk for mothers and infant mortality rate and subjective measures such as the political status of women.

Charles MacCormack, president and CEO of Save the Children, said the report card "illustrates the direct line between the status of mothers and the status of their children."

"In countries where mothers do well, children do well," he said in a written statement accompanying the report.

But each year, according to the report, more than a half-million women die as a result of pregnancy and childbirth difficulties, 2 million babies die within their first 24 hours, 2 million more die within their first month and 3 million are stillborn.

>snip<

Causes of death in the developing world were dramatically different from those in the developed world, the report said. In industrialized nations deaths were most likely to result from babies being born too small or too early, while in the developing world about half of newborn deaths were from infection, tetanus and diarrhea.

The newborn mortality rate in the United States has fallen in recent decades, the report said, but continues to affect minorities disproportionately.

Only 17 percent of all U.S. births were to African-American families, but 33 percent of all low-birthweight babies were African-American, according to the report.

The research also found that poorer mothers with less education were at a significantly higher risk of early delivery. The study added that in general lower educational attainment was associated with higher newborn mortality.

Tinker said some nations ranked high in part because they offer free health services for pregnant women and babies, while the United States suffers from disparities in access to health care.

"We can do better here, but what's really important is that we do something" in the developing world, she said.

The report said almost all newborn and maternal deaths take place in developing nations -- 99 percent and 98 percent, respectively. The newborn mortality rates were particularly high in countries with a recent history of armed conflict, including Liberia and Sierra Leone.

But the report also concluded that political will was more important than national wealth. A "newborn scorecard" ranking 78 developing nations found that some relatively impoverished countries -- including Colombia, Mexico, Nicaragua and Vietnam -- fare better than others.

Ranking at the bottom of the scorecard were Liberia, Afghanistan, Angola and Iraq -- countries where armed conflict and cultural practices impede newborn survival.

"It's tragic that millions of newborns die every year, especially when these deaths are so easily preventable," Gates wrote. "Three out of four newborn deaths could be avoided with simple, low-cost tools that already exist, such as antibiotics for pneumonia, sterile blades to cut umbilical cords and knit caps to keep babies warm."

The Mothers' Index -- which excluded some nations that lacked sufficient data -- highlights huge disparities between the nations at the top and the bottom of the list.

Compared with mothers in the top 10 countries, a mother in the bottom 10 was found to be more than 750 times more likely to die in pregnancy or childbirth.

In top-ranked Sweden, skilled personnel are present at nearly all births, but in bottom-ranked Niger, such help is available for only 16 percent of women in labor.

"The good news," said MacCormack, "is that we know what it takes to help these moms and children survive and thrive."

The report highlights the three areas it says have the most influence on child well-being: female education, presence of a trained attendant at birth and use of family planning services.

Educated women, the report said, are more likely to marry and give birth later in life, to seek health care and to encourage education for their children, including girls.

The report said that family planning and increased contraception use leads to lower maternal and infant death rates. Many women and children in developing nations, it said, die as a result of births that come at the wrong time -- too close together, too early or too late in the mother's life.

link

Anybody want to argue that the US system of health care works?

Among industrialized nations, we are only second to Latvia as the worst country to live in if you're a mother or a baby.
Even many developing nations have lower infant and maternal mortality rates than the United States.
But hey, we've got a kick-arse military, so who cares?
Priorities.
__________________
Lightdemon: "Is 10 going to outer space or something?"
Jerry: "...yes, 10 is going to outerspace."
1069 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 04-22-07, 02:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Guru

 
PeteEU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Last Online: Today 08:23 AM
Location: Mijas, Costa del Sol
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 82
Thanked 494 Times in 369 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Torn
Re: U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says

Not exactly earth shattering news.. been known for years if not decades.
__________________
PeteEU
PeteEU is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-22-07, 04:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Advisor
 
bandaidwoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 10-24-08 05:39 AM
Location: Covington,Georgia
Posts: 584
Thanks: 4
Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says

I am going to quote myself from another thread

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not to diminsh the accomplishment of other countries on low infant mortality or the very real problem we have here......but let me tell you how statistics can be skewed to make the US infant mortality look bad:



The United States easily has the most intensive system of emergency intervention to keep low birth weight and premature infants alive in the world.

The US is only one of a handful countries that keeps detailed statistics on early fetal mortality -- the survival rate of infants who are born as early as the 20th week of gestation.


Quote:
Thus, in the United States if an infant is born weighing only 400 grams and not breathing, a doctor will likely spend lot of time and money trying to revive that infant. If the infant does not survive -- and the mortality rate for such infants is in excess of 50 percent -- that sequence of events will be recorded as a live birth and then a death. In many countries (including many European countries) such severe medical intervention would not be attempted this would recorded as a fetal death rather than a live birth. That unfortunate infant would never show up in infant mortality statistics!!!


The above paraphrased from medical site discussion board.




Take Cuba (which has a better infant mortality)..... they do not register births under 1000g. In fact, this is precisely what the World Health Organization itself recommends that for official record keeping purposes, only live births of greater than 1,000g should be included. But guess what, we do!


Cuba looks better than the united states but in fact what is probably true is that the United States takes far more serious (and expensive) interventions among extremely low birth weight and extremely premature infants than Cuba (or much of the rest of the world for that matter) does.

The above are probably confounding variables along with decreased prenatal care in the poor of course

Anyway, just pointing out how in medicine if you don't look at the confounding variables the media does a sloppy job of reporting the real picture.

In summary, I would not use our infant mortality data to show what a sucky job we are doing compared to the rest of the world. Data that show how countries with national health insurance kicks our butt in terms of managing chronic, long term diseases would have more solid ground to stand on.
bandaidwoman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-22-07, 04:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
la cholita gringa

 
1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Today 12:43 AM
Posts: 13,421
Thanks: 4,050
Thanked 2,261 Times in 1,658 Posts

Awards:
Asshat of the year:  Winner of the Debate Politics 2008 Asshat of the Year Award. Congratulations! Reverse Debates:  This person has participated in reverse debates. 

Current Mood:
Sunshine
Thread Starter Re: U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandaidwoman View Post
I am going to quote myself from another thread




Anyway, just pointing out how in medicine if you don't look at the confounding variables the media does a sloppy job of reporting the real picture.

In summary, I would not use our infant mortality data to show what a sucky job we are doing compared to the rest of the world. Data that show how countries with national health insurance kicks our butt in terms of managing chronic, long term diseases would have more solid ground to stand on.
I've posted such data on this forum before (the W.H.O.'s infant and maternal mortality statistics by country, etc).
Nobody seemed overly interested or impressed.
I thought perhaps something a little more casual and sensationalistic might do the trick.
1069 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-22-07, 04:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
Advisor
 
bandaidwoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 10-24-08 05:39 AM
Location: Covington,Georgia
Posts: 584
Thanks: 4
Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1069 View Post
I've posted such data on this forum before (the W.H.O.'s infant and maternal mortality statistics by country, etc).
Nobody seemed overly interested or impressed.
I thought perhaps something a little more casual and sensationalistic might do the trick.

Yes I see I agree that hopefully it opens up the discussion about how we have a lot to learn from these other countries and that we cannot continue to stick our heads in the sand and pretend we still have the best medical system going.
bandaidwoman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-23-07, 03:19 AM   #6 (permalink)
Judicial Apologist
Mod team member
 
RightinNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Online: 11-05-08 07:43 PM
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 13,595
Thanks: 975
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,514 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 

Current Mood:
Approved
Re: U.S. has second worst newborn death rate in modern world, report says

1) This story is almost a year old.

2)Did you even read your own article? According to the list (which is itself based on numerous subjective items without an explanation of how they're arrived at), it ranks the US as #10 on the Mother's Index, tied with the UK and just one place behind Canada. Considering how much more they spend on their health care system overseas, the fact that we're tied with the UK means we must be doing something more efficiently.

(What's more, our rank should be even higher based solely on the #'s, but they see fit to punish the US in the rankings because women only represent 15% of our elected officials. What this has to do with health and mortality rates is beyond me.)

3) If you go look at the actual report (rather than trusting an idiot journalists take on it), you'll see something quite interesting.

The stat of the US being "the second worst?" What they actually mean is that the US falls into the second category. For some reason unbeknownst to me, the idiots calculating these figures decided to just round everything to the nearest whole percentage. I guess they must have skipped the day where the class learned about significant digits. As a result, they lumped the US's 4.7% rate in with all the other 5's. It's even more interesting when you note that the UK, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Denmark, Canada, and Australia are just one notch ahead of the US on this list.

4) If you look at the actual Children's Index Rank that they calculate, the US comes in FIFTH out of 165 countries. That's not so bad, I don't think.

Amazing to see what you can learn if you don't just believe everything you read.
__________________
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
RightinNYC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Captain America
· · ·
Member Galleries
988 photos
217 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO