Are These Memos Legitimate? - Page 50

GPS_Flex · 07-14-05, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Billo Really

...if you don't understand the other persons point [to the extent that you can repeat that point back to them, to thier satisfaction], then you don't know what it is that you are rebutting. And if you don't know what your rebutting, everything after that is commenting on something you don't know anything about.

Would that meet the criteria you speak of? Have I repeated your point back to you or not? If not, why?

Billo_Really · 07-14-05, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by GPS_Flex:
Would that meet the criteria you speak of? Have I repeated your point back to you or not? If not, why?

Yes, of coarse you do. I said in my reply...

Quote:

In looking at your reply, whether I agree or not, I can tell that you do the work. You responded to what is stated, and addressed just that. You didn't find that hard to do, did you?.

...that you are one of the ones that does the work. I put more stock in the things people like you say than the ones who are just constantly "riffing".

fourddream · 03-02-06, 01:53 PM

Well these declassified documents are real, or are you going to claim they're not?

http://www.gwu.edu/%7ensarchiv/news/...northwoods.pdf