Article is here.
The Moonies, fresh from their attempted smear attack on Obama, are now attempting to smear Pelosi, claiming that she is demanding a personal military aircraft to fly her, and her entire staff, back and forth to California.
Here are the facts:
In fact, the central claims of the Washington Times piece are both false.1) The House Sergeant at Arms, not Pelosi, initiated inquiries into the use of military aircraft. House Sergeant at Arms Wilson Livingood, who has served in his position since 1995, released a statement today clarifying the facts. He writes, ďIn December 2006, I advised Speaker Pelosi that the US Air Force had made an airplane available to Speaker Hastert for security and communications purposes following September 11, 2001.Ē Additionally, Livingood writes, ďI offered to call the U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense to seek clarification of the guidelines [which governed Speaker Hastertís use of a plane].Ē
2) A larger plane was requested because Hastertís plane required refueling to travel cross-country. The Washington Times says a larger plane was requested to accomodate Pelosi, ďher staff, other Members and supporters.Ē Thatís not true. In fact, the plane used by Speaker Hastert was too small for Pelosi since it ďneeds to refuel every 2,000 miles and could not make the nonstop haul to California. ĎThe Air Force determined that [Pelosiís] safety would be best ensured by using a plane that has the fuel capacity to go coast-to-coast,íĒ a Pelosi spokesperson said.