• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Washington Times Publishes False Report On Pelosi’s Use Of Military Aircraft

Stinger said:
And so now it starts, everytime Pelosi is critisized watch for the "I am woman hear me roar" hammer come out to smash down any desent.
I agree, this has nothing to do with sexism and I'm thorougly disgusted that she brought it up. :x She needs to explain why she thinks she needs a plane that can fly non-stop. What exactly are the security risks associated with refueling that are so much higher than when she lands in California?
 
I have to agree, I don't think its sexism. I think she is silly to have brought it up, except that one specious attack deserves another I suppose. To me, danarhea has shown that it is entirely a partisan hack attack.

In any case, Pelosi has decided to fly on a commercial plane that flies non-stop whenever she can't get non-stop from the Pentagon.
 
I have to agree, I don't think its sexism. I think she is silly to have brought it up, except that one specious attack deserves another I suppose. To me, danarhea has shown that it is entirely a partisan hack attack.

In any case, Pelosi has decided to fly on a commercial plane that flies non-stop whenever she can't get non-stop from the Pentagon.

Dumb move on her part. She is next in the line of succession to the Presidency after Cheney. She should be flying in an Air Force plane. She now says she is going to fly commercial if a military plane is not available. That, IMHO, compromises national security.
 
Guess who just joined Pelosi's side? The Bush administration, which thinks the story about Pelosi is silly, and unfair to her.

And once again, despite the lies, the White House has confirmed the following:

But Snow on Thursday said the negotiations over Pelosi's transport have been conducted solely by the House sergeant-at-arms and the Pentagon, with no direct involvement by the speaker or her office -- or the White House.
Pelosi did NOT request the plane, as the Moonies have charged.

Washington Times = Moonies = Rag full of lies


Article is here
 
Guess who just joined Pelosi's side? The Bush administration, which thinks the story about Pelosi is silly, and unfair to her.

And once again, despite the lies, the White House has confirmed the following:

Pelosi did NOT request the plane, as the Moonies have charged.

Washington Times = Moonies = Rag full of lies


Article is here

She didn't request the plane she demanded it not only that but she had John Murtha the head of the appropriations committee call the Air Force, which is clearly a veiled threat to cut military funding.
 
Guess who just joined Pelosi's side? The Bush administration, which thinks the story about Pelosi is silly, and unfair to her.

And once again, despite the lies, the White House has confirmed the following:

Pelosi did NOT request the plane, as the Moonies have charged.

Washington Times = Moonies = Rag full of lies


Article is here

:rofl

Of course not. If she is too important to be bothered with refueling, she is too important to negotiate for herself. None of that means she didn't request a larger plane as her own words have proven her wishes are behind the negotiations.
 
:rofl

Of course not. If she is too important to be bothered with refueling, she is too important to negotiate for herself. None of that means she didn't request a larger plane as her own words have proven her wishes are behind the negotiations.

Jeez, you and TOT are calling Tony Snow a liar now. I thought only Liberals called the Bush administration liars. :rofl

But Snow on Thursday said the negotiations over Pelosi's transport have been conducted solely by the House sergeant-at-arms and the Pentagon, with no direct involvement by the speaker or her office -- or the White House.

Article is here

What kind of cheese would you guys like with your whine? By the way, the Bush administration called you guys silly. What do you have to say about that? :rofl
 
Game, set and match :2razz:


Thank you for playing!
 
Jeez, you and TOT are calling Tony Snow a liar now. I thought only Liberals called the Bush administration liars. :rofl



Article is here

What kind of cheese would you guys like with your whine? By the way, the Bush administration called you guys silly. What do you have to say about that? :rofl

Are you that stupid? Course Pelosi was involved....and I could care less what Snow said......only a complete moron wouldn't believe she had a say so in the matter....an AP story quoted her saying why she wanted the plane.....the Sgt of Arms may have started this by asking for a military aircraft.....but Pelosi herself is the one that started asking for this huge cargo jet instead of a small jet that the last Speaker used......why does she need a jet that can carry three tanks around?

btw you liberal hack........when did you start believing anything Bush said?....you are of the mind set that he has lied about everything so far so why would you believe him now?

you are so transparent.....does anyone here not believe that you are nothing more than a liberal trying to give conservatives a bad name?
 
Are you that stupid? Course Pelosi was involved....and I could care less what Snow said......only a complete moron wouldn't believe she had a say so in the matter....an AP story quoted her saying why she wanted the plane.....the Sgt of Arms may have started this by asking for a military aircraft.....but Pelosi herself is the one that started asking for this huge cargo jet instead of a small jet that the last Speaker used......why does she need a jet that can carry three tanks around?

btw you liberal hack........when did you start believing anything Bush said?....you are of the mind set that he has lied about everything so far so why would you believe him now?

you are so transparent.....does anyone here not believe that you are nothing more than a liberal trying to give conservatives a bad name?
Your response is a classic. Keep calling the Bush administration liars. Whatever credibility you might have had (where was it, in your little finger?) is now gone. Oh, by the way, about the namecalling. Sticks and stones. You can't get a rise out of me that easily. LOL.
"This is a silly story" - Tony Snow
I think he is talking about you, Cold Dirt. Damn, you must think those Bushies really suck. :rofl

Hmmm, I think red whine for you. LMAO. :)
 
Last edited:
Cold Dirt said:
Are you that stupid?

btw you liberal hack........when did you start believing anything Bush said?....you are of the mind set that he has lied about everything so far so why would you believe him now?

you are so transparent.....does anyone here not believe that you are nothing more than a liberal trying to give conservatives a bad name?
Why don't you understand that there's more to being liberal or conservative than running lock-step with anyone who claims the same label while bashing the other side every change you get? Are YOU that stupid? You're the partisan hack here, and people like you are the ones that give conservatives a bad name, not Dana.
 
:rofl

Of course not. If she is too important to be bothered with refueling, she is too important to negotiate for herself. None of that means she didn't request a larger plane as her own words have proven her wishes are behind the negotiations.

Somebody needs to sit her down and tell her she is NOT Queen Pelosi, she was not elected to an office voted on in a general election, she is Speaker of the HOUSE and no more, and we really don't care what gender she is.
 
Somebody needs to sit her down and tell her she is NOT Queen Pelosi, she was not elected to an office voted on in a general election, she is Speaker of the HOUSE and no more, and we really don't care what gender she is.

Wow - The Bush bashers are really coming out of the woodwork today. I thought it was unpatriotic to bash Bush. :rofl

But Snow on Thursday said the negotiations over Pelosi's transport have been conducted solely by the House sergeant-at-arms and the Pentagon, with no direct involvement by the speaker or her office -- or the White House.
Article is here
 
:rofl

Democrat Anthony Weiner just beat the living crap out of the GOP during a session of the House. You have to see this video. He hits the nail on the head as to why Republicans are quickly becoming the party of irrelevance. Instead of doing America's business, they are still obsessing over Pelosi's plane, even to the point of debating against the the facts which were given by the White House itself. And also note his use of the phrase "Republic party".

:rofl

You Tube Video is here. Watch it. It is one of the biggest slam dunks I have ever seen in Congress.
 
danarhea said:
He hits the nail on the head as to why Republicans are quickly becoming the party of irrelevance.
3 months later and they still don't get it. They're either in a colossal state of denial or are still punch drunk from the beating they took in November.
danarhea said:
Instead of doing America's business, they are still obsessing over Pelosi's plane
And almost on cue, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R) North Carolina made an a$$ of himself, reiterating the cons obsession with Pelosi. She's gonna make them all more nuttier than they already are before she's through...LOL...:lol:
danarhea said:
And also note his use of the phrase "Republic party".
11 times ;)
 
You're right...accidents DO happen...want proof? Pelosi is speaker of the house...

BubbaBob

Trust me; that was no accident.
 
Back
Top Bottom