Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives No Birth Control for You!; In case the text didn't convey it well enough - the title of this thread was meant to be read ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-05, 10:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Student
 
walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Last Online: 11-17-08 12:55 PM
Location: Georgia
Posts: 195
Thanks: 4
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Apprehensive
No Birth Control for You!

In case the text didn't convey it well enough - the title of this thread was meant to be read in the voice of the "Soup Nazi" from Seinfeld -

This incident happened locally but it is my understanding that it has happened throughout the country. A woman went to a Walgreens pharmacy to fill a prescription for birth control. According to the woman's own statement, the (female) pharmacist politely told her that she could not fill that prescription on moral grounds. She told the customer that another pharmacist would be in shortly and that he could fill it, or she could call her prescription in to another pharmacy. The woman is now outraged, litigious, and promoting a law requiring pharmacists to fill all legal prescriptions put before them.

What do you think?
__________________
"If a man isn't a liberal by the time he is twenty he has no heart. If a man isn't a conservative by the time he is thirty he has no brain." - Sir Winston Churchill

"Illegitimi Non Carborundum" - Unknown
walrus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 05-11-05, 11:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
Non-Passive Pascifist

 
Gandhi>Bush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Last Online: 12-11-06 08:34 PM
Location: Mesquite, Texas
Posts: 2,759
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male
Send a message via AIM to Gandhi>Bush

Awards:
Veteran Moderator:  Thank you for all your contributions to DebatePolitics! 

Current Mood:
Relaxed
Re: No Birth Control for You!

How are perscription birth control pills against anyone's morals?

I wouldn't mind a law requiring pharmacists to fill perscriptions, but all in all I'm fairly indifferent.
__________________
I will let no man drag me down so low as to make me hate him. - Booker T. Washington

Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him. - Martin Luther King, Jr.

I believe that a man is the strongest soldier for daring to die unarmed. - Mohandas K Gandhi

http://img287.echo.cx/img287/1156/ghandibush5kp.jpg

Props to ArchEnemy. My signature rocks hard.
Gandhi>Bush is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-15-05, 11:44 PM   #3 (permalink)
Guru

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Last Online: 05-07-06 05:28 PM
Posts: 3,838
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean:

Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus
In case the text didn't convey it well enough - the title of this thread was meant to be read in the voice of the "Soup Nazi" from Seinfeld -

This incident happened locally but it is my understanding that it has happened throughout the country. A woman went to a Walgreens pharmacy to fill a prescription for birth control. According to the woman's own statement, the (female) pharmacist politely told her that she could not fill that prescription on moral grounds. She told the customer that another pharmacist would be in shortly and that he could fill it, or she could call her prescription in to another pharmacy. The woman is now outraged, litigious, and promoting a law requiring pharmacists to fill all legal prescriptions put before them.

What do you think?
Perhaps the pharmacist felt that she was entitled to exercise her first amendment freedom. Can we expect the ACLU to weigh in on this?
Fantasea is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-16-05, 12:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
26 X World Champs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Last Online: 07-04-08 08:30 PM
Location: Upper West Side of Manhattan (10024)
Posts: 7,571
Thanks: 952
Thanked 434 Times in 319 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Inspired
Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantasea
Perhaps the pharmacist felt that she was entitled to exercise her first amendment freedom. Can we expect the ACLU to weigh in on this?
Great logic, again! So if a pharmacist is against certain medications she has the right to not dispense them? Anyone who would support depriving anyone of any prescription is living in a sick Fantasea world....
26 X World Champs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-16-05, 12:33 AM   #5 (permalink)
17x NBA Champs

 
ludahai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 06:17 PM
Location: Taichung, Taiwan - Home of the 2007 Baseball World Cup
Posts: 3,932
Thanks: 518
Thanked 331 Times in 256 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Send a message via MSN to ludahai

Current Mood:
Pissedoff
Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandhi>Bush
How are perscription birth control pills against anyone's morals?

I wouldn't mind a law requiring pharmacists to fill perscriptions, but all in all I'm fairly indifferent.
Because for some people, birth control pills violate their religious principles. The Catholic Church teaches that the use of birth control pills are a moral wrong. I happen to agree with that position.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 X World Champs
Great logic, again! So if a pharmacist is against certain medications she has the right to not dispense them? Anyone who would support depriving anyone of any prescription is living in a sick Fantasea world....
This isn't like most other prescriptions which are designed to cure someone from some kind of illness. This inteferes with the natural order of the creation of human life. This is something that is a violation of the moral belief of millions of Americans. Should someone be driven out of a profession that they have trained for and perhaps even love because they have a moral objection to one class of medication? There are plenty of other pharmicists who WILL fill out the prescription. Let them fill it!
ludahai is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-16-05, 12:37 AM   #6 (permalink)
The Baby Wrasslin'

 
Simon W. Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Last Online: Today 02:02 AM
Location: Fayettenam
Posts: 6,008
Thanks: 103
Thanked 525 Times in 315 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 

Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandhi>Bush
How are perscription birth control pills against anyone's morals?
It's not just Catholics who have reservations about certain forms of birth control. I suupose that someone in the pharmacists' position might equate it with you being asked to help support war.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandhi>Bush
I wouldn't mind a law requiring pharmacists to fill perscriptions, but all in all I'm fairly indifferent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 X World Champs
So if a pharmacist is against certain medications she has the right to not dispense them? Anyone who would support depriving anyone of any prescription is living in a sick Fantasea world....
This is a tricky situation. In general, I'd say that someone's right to observe their religious conviction would outweigh someone's need for The Pill. Yet, the issue has further ramifications than just bc.
__________________
"That is the problem... [we] fell in love with the idea that politicians-- even the slickest and brightest presidential candidates-- were real heroes and truly exciting people. That is wrong on its face. They are mainly dull people with corrupt instincts and criminal children. -H.S.T"
Simon W. Moon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-16-05, 12:54 AM   #7 (permalink)
Guru

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Last Online: 05-07-06 05:28 PM
Posts: 3,838
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean:

Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 X World Champs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantasea
Perhaps the pharmacist felt that she was entitled to exercise her first amendment freedom. Can we expect the ACLU to weigh in on this?
Great logic, again! So if a pharmacist is against certain medications she has the right to not dispense them? Anyone who would support depriving anyone of any prescription is living in a sick Fantasea world....
Why not? The pharmacist was not placing the woman's life in danger.

Hospital personnel who are not Pro-Death can't be forced to participate in abortion procedures.

Depending on ones philosophical leanings, Wal-Mart either practices censorship or exercises its first amendment rights in refusing to sell CDs it had deemed to be offensive.

Why should anyone be forced to act against his conscience?
Fantasea is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-16-05, 06:43 AM   #8 (permalink)
Professor

 
akyron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Last Online: 09-20-08 06:52 PM
Posts: 2,479
Thanks: 137
Thanked 122 Times in 96 Posts

Current Mood:
Relaxed
Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantasea
Why not? The pharmacist was not placing the woman's life in danger.

Hospital personnel who are not Pro-Death can't be forced to participate in abortion procedures.

Depending on ones philosophical leanings, Wal-Mart either practices censorship or exercises its first amendment rights in refusing to sell CDs it had deemed to be offensive.

Why should anyone be forced to act against his conscience?


They should not. They could work somewhere else. An alternative would be to just hang a sign:

We reserve the right to refuse service.
akyron is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-16-05, 11:10 AM   #9 (permalink)
Pundit-licious

 
shuamort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 04:45 PM
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 7,303
Thanks: 275
Thanked 933 Times in 532 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Send a message via AIM to shuamort Send a message via Yahoo to shuamort

Awards:
Veteran Moderator:  Thank you for all your contributions to DebatePolitics! 

Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantasea
Why not? The pharmacist was not placing the woman's life in danger.

Hospital personnel who are not Pro-Death can't be forced to participate in abortion procedures.

Depending on ones philosophical leanings, Wal-Mart either practices censorship or exercises its first amendment rights in refusing to sell CDs it had deemed to be offensive.

Why should anyone be forced to act against his conscience?
You'll have to remind us all how these pharmacists were FORCED to work these jobs.
shuamort is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-16-05, 01:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
Student
 
Join Date: May 2005
Last Online: 11-09-05 08:24 PM
Posts: 188
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean:

Re: No Birth Control for You!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantasea
Perhaps the pharmacist felt that she was entitled to exercise her first amendment freedom. Can we expect the ACLU to weigh in on this?
There is no such thing as freedom of speech in a private business. I would be livid if that happened to me. If she has such a problem dispensing certain meds, then maybe she is in the wrong business. If someone has such an issue with it they either need to have a second pharmacist with them at all times who CAN fill the subscription, or they need to to find somewhere else to work. I have always used Walgreen's, but if one of their people pulled that crap they would at the VERY least they would b getting a nasty letter from me.
Fu_chick is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DVD Parental Control jfrancis Archives 5 05-01-05 09:40 PM
What does an actual aborted child look like? Mr.America Archives 248 05-01-05 09:00 PM
A simple Yes or No with a short explanation. LiberalFINGER Archives 501 03-23-05 01:58 AM
A question for Gabo anomaly Archives 10 03-21-05 01:54 AM
Gun Control Mr.America Archives 72 01-30-05 04:48 PM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by JustineCredible
· · ·
Member Galleries
1010 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO