• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ummm... That's Not How Breasts Work

What exactly are the physics behind God breasts?

They're omnipotent boobs, they can do what they want.
 
SmokeAndMirrors said:
Uh, wow.

It seems like they spend a lot of time on animating tits. An absurd, pathetic amount of time. How can they still get it so horribly, horribly wrong?

It looks like they took a small plot of wheat grass cut to make a boob-like shape, glued it on, and then draped some clothes on top. What the hell?

StillBallin's example of breast physics looks like they're two gerbils flipping out under her skin.

It's not hard. I can figure this out in my head.

I think the main issue is that they want the boobs to be moving ALWAYS. Boobs do not always move. If you are simply ambling at a slow rate, as in the first video, they wobble around the edges a bit, but the whole thing doesn't bounce around. And when they bounce, they hit a hard bottom where the tendons snap them back up -- they don't wave around like grass in the wind, or like the spinal cord of a small animal.

This is not hard.

Have any of these people ever seen boobs?
Click to expand...

Look, woman, you can never spend too much time on that. :lol:
 
Breasts work best when being sucked on
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom