Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Annoucements / Forum News

Annoucements / Forum News Rule #12 updated; Rule #12 has been updated to reflect proxy accounts. 12. Multiple and Proxy accounts - Multiple accounts of the same user ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-07, 07:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Lead Moderator
Mod team member
 
vauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Last Online: 11-28-08 10:19 AM
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 7,148
Thanks: 382
Thanked 495 Times in 274 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Send a message via Yahoo to vauge Send a message via Skype™ to vauge

Awards:
Moderation Team:   Reverse Debates:  One of the original Reverse Debators 

Current Mood:
Amused
Rule #12 updated

Rule #12 has been updated to reflect proxy accounts.

12. Multiple and Proxy accounts - Multiple accounts of the same user are forbidden. Proxy accounts (specifically utilizing a third party to post) will not be tolerated. At the discretion of the moderator, these issues may result in infractions and/or banishment against all accounts.

Mod Team

vauge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to vauge For This Useful Post:
Inline Ads
Old 12-12-07, 04:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
I Heart Sarah Palin
Dungeon Master


 
jallman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Today 02:19 AM
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 17,469
Thanks: 3,873
Thanked 3,067 Times in 2,146 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Amazed
Re: Rule #12 updated

Quote:
Originally Posted by vauge View Post
Rule #12 has been updated to reflect proxy accounts.

12. Multiple and Proxy accounts - Multiple accounts of the same user are forbidden. Proxy accounts (specifically utilizing a third party to post) will not be tolerated. At the discretion of the moderator, these issues may result in infractions and/or banishment against all accounts.

Mod Team

I only bring this up because it was a question I had at one time that others might have. In the event that you have two users in the same household (like stace and caine), is there a procedure for notifying the mods and making sure that their IP addresses arent flagged for action?
jallman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-07, 04:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Lead Moderator
Mod team member
 
vauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Last Online: 11-28-08 10:19 AM
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 7,148
Thanks: 382
Thanked 495 Times in 274 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Send a message via Yahoo to vauge Send a message via Skype™ to vauge

Awards:
Moderation Team:   Reverse Debates:  One of the original Reverse Debators 

Current Mood:
Amused
Thread Starter Re: Rule #12 updated

Quote:
Originally Posted by jallman View Post
I only bring this up because it was a question I had at one time that others might have. In the event that you have two users in the same household (like stace and caine), is there a procedure for notifying the mods and making sure that their IP addresses arent flagged for action?
Yep. Obviously, we cannot tell if caine is clicking the submit button (hypothetically). But we have means to determine if the same computer was used. Beyond the IP address.
vauge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-07, 04:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
Lead Moderator
Mod team member
 
vauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Last Online: 11-28-08 10:19 AM
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 7,148
Thanks: 382
Thanked 495 Times in 274 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Send a message via Yahoo to vauge Send a message via Skype™ to vauge

Awards:
Moderation Team:   Reverse Debates:  One of the original Reverse Debators 

Current Mood:
Amused
Thread Starter Re: Rule #12 updated

Moderator's Warning:
Hi there bub (aka banman), I suggest you logout NOW and let us delete your new account lest you will be banned.
vauge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-07, 04:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
I Heart Sarah Palin
Dungeon Master


 
jallman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Today 02:19 AM
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 17,469
Thanks: 3,873
Thanked 3,067 Times in 2,146 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Amazed
Re: Rule #12 updated

Quote:
Originally Posted by vauge View Post
Yep. Obviously, we cannot tell if caine is clicking the submit button (hypothetically). But we have means to determine if the same computer was used. Beyond the IP address.
I may have mis-stated myself. What I meant to ask is what is the procedure for a household that wants to have two accounts but only 1 PC? How should they go about clearing that with you guys?
jallman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-07, 04:48 PM   #6 (permalink)
Lead Moderator
Mod team member
 
vauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Last Online: 11-28-08 10:19 AM
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 7,148
Thanks: 382
Thanked 495 Times in 274 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Send a message via Yahoo to vauge Send a message via Skype™ to vauge

Awards:
Moderation Team:   Reverse Debates:  One of the original Reverse Debators 

Current Mood:
Amused
Thread Starter Re: Rule #12 updated

Oh thats not a biggy. Just let us know us know.
vauge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to vauge For This Useful Post:
Old 12-12-07, 05:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Dominant
Mod team member

 
WI Crippler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 09:32 PM
Location: Where the sun doesn't shine
Posts: 8,424
Thanks: 1,165
Thanked 2,689 Times in 1,600 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! US Marines:  Served 5 years active duty in the United States Marine Corps. Veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

Re: Rule #12 updated

Quote:
Originally Posted by vauge View Post
Oh thats not a biggy. Just let us know us know.
So is it ok if I create a second account called "Billo's Mom", as long as I let you know about it?

Imagine the possibilities
__________________
"What Jesus fails to appreciate is that it's the meek who are the problem."- Reg
WI Crippler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-07, 08:58 PM   #8 (permalink)
Secret Blogger
Dungeon Master


 
independent_thinker2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Yesterday 11:52 PM
Location: Nation of Whiners
Posts: 20,156
Thanks: 4,508
Thanked 2,762 Times in 1,983 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Devilish
Re: Rule #12 updated

Am I to understand correctly that this will be left up to an individual moderator's discretion without a discussion or chance to explain one's self?

Let's say hypothetically, my wife wants to see what I have been doing without me knowing. She signs up without my knowledge. A mod who doesn't care for me finds out and deletes us both.

I understand the reason behind this rule. I just don't understand why a member would have no recourse. I know who this amending is designed for. I just don't understand why others have to be subjected to an "activist" mod. I am not trying to impugn the integrity of our mods, but they are human. With that being said, the lack of transparency can lead to mistakes. We are all adults here and should be able to debate things on a debate forum.

I understand that secrecy is supposed to free up mods to be honest. It also opens them up to be dishonest. Of course, how would we know? I don't understand why the mods can't be honest and transparent. What can possibly happen to them if they say something that is not popular? The fact that we can't discuss a situation concerning a member's banning is troubling. Please tell me where I am wrong.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
Hell I could probably beat McCain.....
==]:{o
independent_thinker2002 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-07, 09:14 PM   #9 (permalink)
Lead Moderator
Mod team member
 
vauge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Last Online: 11-28-08 10:19 AM
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 7,148
Thanks: 382
Thanked 495 Times in 274 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Send a message via Yahoo to vauge Send a message via Skype™ to vauge

Awards:
Moderation Team:   Reverse Debates:  One of the original Reverse Debators 

Current Mood:
Amused
Thread Starter Re: Rule #12 updated

No worries, A PM is sent to the user(s) *before* any action is taken on multiple accounts. If we know that your spouse will create an account - no worries.

The discretion here is meant to say that if a mod found an issue with a user/account (and can prove it, we can take action immediately. Upon that action we can decide the level of infraction.). Else, we will create a thread in the mod team forum about a possible action on XYZ. That thread can sometimes take days to find a resolution.

Every action we do is logged, re-logged and posted in a hidden forum for discussion. This allows us as a team to validate and question each and every mod activity. Each mod action is up for question among the team.

In short, we do our best to walk the talk and try to side on the error of members first and foremost.
vauge is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-07, 09:31 PM   #10 (permalink)
The Baby Wrasslin'

 
Simon W. Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Last Online: Today 01:45 AM
Location: Fayettenam
Posts: 5,995
Thanks: 102
Thanked 520 Times in 311 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 

Re: Rule #12 updated

Mods fall all over themselves trying not to give members unnecessary grief.
No one will be summarily banned over this without a chance to explain. Of this I have no doubt.
However, if your spouse or kid or whoever is gonna start an account at your house, it may be wise to give a heads up via email or pm to save yourself and the mods some troubles.
__________________
"That is the problem... [we] fell in love with the idea that politicians-- even the slickest and brightest presidential candidates-- were real heroes and truly exciting people. That is wrong on its face. They are mainly dull people with corrupt instincts and criminal children. -H.S.T"
Simon W. Moon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Member Galleries
1009 photos
219 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO