• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Cecil Effect' dangerous for lions, guides

MickeyW

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
14,012
Reaction score
3,439
Location
Southern Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The international backlash against big game hunters triggered by last year's killing of a beloved lion named “Cecil” could spell doom for hundreds of the beasts who now roam a Zimbabwe preserve.

The deafening criticism after Cecil’s death in July has created a chilling effect among many in the industry, leading to more hunters staying home, animal populations growing out of control and a more dangerous environment for guides, say experts.
'Cecil Effect' dangerous for lions, guides | Fox News
 
Ok, look, I don't think there's inherently anything morally wrong with hunting. Not a fan of trophy or canned hunts so I won't do it myself, but I won't infringe on your right to do it. Please, though, can we stop pretending that people go hunting for the good of animals or that anyone lamenting the backlash surrounding Cecil's killing is doing so out of concern over all the animals in Africa? Cry about the backlash all you want but at least be real that's it's simply because you don't like folks scrutinizing or criticizing your favorite blood sport. Quit trying to use my affinity for animals to try to gain my support for killing them.
 
Back
Top Bottom