Hey, not so fast, I think you're jumping to a few conclusions based on what I wrote. I didn't mean to suggest the situation is as simple as that. Sorry if my wording was misleading.
What's fact is that 82% of the budget of the Egypt military currently consists of US "aid", which means it's totally in the pocket of the US.
United States military aid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And yes, the West was happy with a pro-Western dictatorship. Of course, a pro-Western democracy would have been better, icing on the cake so to speak, but hey, when that's not possible, let's take the former. So of course the West supported Mubarak for all the decades, until it became obvious that a continuation of support would be damaging for Western interests (especially the claim to side with democratic movements and the "Arab spring"). Just like the West supported the democratic development, until anti-Western islamists were elected and made obvious they're not willing to play by democratic rules.
I don't think the Egypt military is a direct puppet of the US, but they certainly didn't take the first opportunity to once again side with the people against Morsi and topple him, without an "okay" from those who fund them. And certainly, the US did not ask them to be as trigger-happy towards the islamists as they now are. But not few in the West were probably relieved to hear that the islamists are removed from power once again, this way or another. So yeah, the condemnation of the harsh treatment of islamist protesters is partly genuine, but I guess priority is the "right" outcome.
And I fail to see what's allegedly so shocking about this kind of Western/US meddling in Middle Eastern affairs and other places in the world? It has been going on for decades, and most past Presidents did much more to meddle and influence than Obama of all people. Has Reagan been impeached for Iran Contra and supporting Saddam against Iran, or for arming the islamists in Afghanistan against the Soviets? Has Bush sr. been impeached for going to war against Saddam? Has Bush jr. been impeached for starting war against Iraq? Has any of the post-WW2 Presidents been impeached for US military aid to Israel and funding for pro-Israeli Arab governments such as Saudi-Arabia? It's simply realpolitik, and certainly not a matter of Dems vs. Reps.
So did the West want Morsi removed, after it had became obvious he's not willing to play by democratic rules? Absolutely.
Only fears are that the situation, due to the harsh treatment against the islamists, may become unstable (a stable pro-Western tyranny is better than chaos in any shape), and certainly the Western leaders would have appreciated if the military had somehow involved the islamists peacefully, because they're a strong factor. Also, I don't say humanitarian concerns are always not genuine from the side of the West, so I guess the West would have appreciated a less violent overthrow of the islamists.
But on the bottom line, as long as pro-Western people are in power in the end, nobody will shed any tears.