• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Landau's problems.

BrettNortje

Banned
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
793
Reaction score
22
Location
Cape Town
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
This is a section of mathematics where primes are observed to be the focus.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landau's_problems said:
1. Goldbach's conjecture: Can every even integer greater than 2 be written as the sum of two primes?

This is where we need to prove [xn] + [xn] = even number. seeing as how all primes are odd numbers, and, any odd number added to any odd number equals an even number, we need to express that;

[xn] + [xn] = [2xn] = [2x^n] = even number.
 
This means that [x] must be [x] = [n + n] = [n - n = a]. so, if primes can be added to mean something, then they can be subtracted to mean the same thing, in theory, as;

if [3 + 7] = [x] or [10] then [7 - 3] = [4]. maybe there is a new formula for this? 40 percent? sum of lesser prime by two?

[5 + 11] = [14]. [11 - 5] = [6] = no pattern.

But, we know that [xn] + [xn] = [2xn] = [2x^n]!
 
2. Twin prime conjecture: Are there infinitely many primes p such that p + 2 is prime?

Numbers repeat themselves after 999, going on in patterns with lesser numbers equaling these with bigger bits on the left hand side or the greater side of the values. this means if you have 197 or 637299197, it will be that either they both are prime or neither of them are prime, yes?

So, while [5 + 2] = [prime 7], 13 + 2 = 15 which is not prime, and therefore does not follow this pattern. no, this is incorrect.
 
Back
Top Bottom