Abortion Proposal Sets Condition on Aid - Page 2

prometeus · 07-19-08, 05:30 PM

You misunderstood probably for the same reason.
I was merely suggesting that you should own BOOKS in stead of A book.
We all make occasional typos, hardly a point of criticism.

1069 · 07-19-08, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prometeus

You misunderstood probably for the same reason.
I was merely suggesting that you should own BOOKS in stead of A book.
We all make occasional typos, hardly a point of criticism.

Agreed. Everyone should own many, many books.

DarkWizard12 · 07-19-08, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1069

Agreed. Everyone should own many, many books.

Do e-books count?

Scucca · 07-20-08, 05:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkWizard12

IF abortion ever becomes illegal and criminalized, will you (the pro-choice crowd) concede that it is by your own definition, "murder"(unlawful killing)?

It would be a 'crime' that could only be understand with the application of Marxist criminology

DarkWizard12 · 07-20-08, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scucca

It would be a 'crime' that could only be understand with the application of Marxist criminology

If its marxist to protect life, I'm a marxist then.

You can have life before liberty, but not liberty before life.

Scucca · 07-20-08, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkWizard12

If its marxist...

We'd have an appreciation of how the criminal justice system is used within class conflict, as the ruling classes impose their morality (and reinforce their control) on the working classes

DarkWizard12 · 07-20-08, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scucca

We'd have an appreciation of how the criminal justice system is used within class conflict, as the ruling classes impose their morality (and reinforce their control) on the working classes

I had no idea the so called "ruling class" had morals.

UtahBill · 07-20-08, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkWizard12

I had no idea the so called "ruling class" had morals.

The ruling class has set moral standards, and wants to enforce them on the rest of us, but they don't want to be held to those standards.
Same can be said for topics other than abortion.

Iriemon · 07-20-08, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1069

You know, the very fact that such a preposterous human rights violation could even be proposed by the highest office in the land, and not be met with jeers and garbage-throwing, followed by running the proposers out of town on a rail, preferably tarred and feathered, just shows me that women are still not fully considered human beings and the equals of men. ...

Put McCain in office and there's a good chance that not only will it be proposed but upheld by the Supreme Court when it overturns Roe v. Wade.

talloulou · 07-20-08, 01:29 PM

It's a question of whether federal aid health care workers should be allowed to refuse to do abortions or supply birth control.

Despite 10's hysteria it's actually an interesting question.

On the one side I can't imagine literally forcing certain workers to do abortions or risk loosing their jobs. On the flip side I can't imagine a pharmacy or clinic that doesn't carry birth control, or doesn't carry it at a particular time when a particular someone is working.

But then again it only effects federally funded programs and from the sounds of it the whole thing merely aims to protect prolifer types from being fired. It doesn't advocate only hiring prolifer types so really I don't see the big deal.