• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Blocks Ohio PP Law

Peter King said:
Great, more fantasy and stupid insults because you have a twisted view on the subject of abortion. Sorry but that is total and utter nonsense but that is hardly surprising from someone who hates the fact that women have the freedom to choose.
Click to expand...

"Hates the freedom to choose [to commit violence]." :roll:

Those who choose to initiate force against innocent human beings do not deserve freedom; it's why we have prisons.
 
JayDubya said:
No, but I do enjoy concretely establishing how "your side" is repugnant on so many levels. This is hardly even the worst aspect of your position, but it is one that "progressives" bristle at... because it pegs them right to the wall.
Click to expand...

:lamo
 
JayDubya said:
No, but I do enjoy concretely establishing how "your side" is repugnant on so many levels. This is hardly even the worst aspect of your position, but it is one that "progressives" bristle at... because it pegs them right to the wall.
Click to expand...

You havn't done that one time LMAO this is why even pro-lifers mock the retarded lies in your posts. According to their own words, the honest, educated and objective pro-lifers here do not stand with your posts, ooooops LMAO
Your post fails again! :)
 
AGENT J said:
You havn't done that one time LMAO this is why even pro-lifers mock the retarded lies in your posts. According to their own words, the honest, educated and objective pro-lifers here do not stand with your posts, ooooops LMAO
Your post fails again! :)
Click to expand...
Why do you even bother replying to JayDubya when he has you blocked?
 
GEIxBattleRifle said:
Why do you even bother replying to JayDubya when he has you blocked?
Click to expand...

1.) LMAO no he doesn't. He "claims" that and yet always eventually responds, especially when I destroy his posts and exposes them even worse than normal, in fact he has responded to me today already
2.) even if in the furtue he does for real, or ANY poster for that matter why would I care? Why would I stop exposing lies and retarded claims that are factually not true? thats silly.
 
JayDubya said:
"Hates the freedom to choose [to commit violence]." :roll:

Those who choose to initiate force against innocent human beings do not deserve freedom; it's why we have prisons.
Click to expand...

What violence would that be?

Because I do know who is violent, anti-abortion extremists killing people, bombing people, etc. etc. etc.

And no, most people who have the freedom to choose make the choice to keep pregnant and only in your mind is it "to commit violence".

And abortion is totally legal and not any of the nonsense you claim that happens and as it is totally legal they are not breaking any laws. So to claim they do not deserve freedom and need to be locked up is just more anti-women nonsense.
 
Scrabaholic said:
How about asking JD the same question - ask him why he replies to me when I have him blocked......
Click to expand...

Because your stated reason for blocking me is a boldfaced and defamatory lie.

It would be absurd for me to respect such a thing at all, let alone on that basis refrain from criticizing your further lies throughout this forum. You just don't like your lies being called out.

That bears no resemblance whatsoever to the behavior of the other poster in question and my quite rational decision to not engage further.
 
Last edited:
JayDubya said:
Because your stated reason for blocking me is a boldfaced and defamatory lie.

It would be absurd for me to respect such a thing at all, let alone on that basis refrain from criticizing your further lies throughout this forum. You just don't like your lies being called out.

That bears no resemblance whatsoever to the behavior of the other poster in question and my quite rational decision to not engage further.
Click to expand...


:shock::shock: WOW!!! did that just happen?:lamo
 
JayDubya said:
Because your stated reason for blocking me is a boldfaced and defamatory lie.
Click to expand...
Actually, the one that has been proven to lie repeatedly is you. You have yet to prove that anyone else has lied.

It would be absurd for me to respect such a thing at all
Click to expand...
It IS absurd for you to respect ANYTHING that is rational, intelligent, educated or factual, not to mention civilized.
 
AGENT J said:
You havn't done that one time LMAO this is why even pro-lifers mock the retarded lies in your posts. According to their own words, the honest, educated and objective pro-lifers here do not stand with your posts, ooooops LMAO
Your post fails again! :)
Click to expand...

Jay is great. Every time he posts, it proves how right the pro-choice people are and how silly his position is.
 
Peter King said:
:2rofll: :2funny:

Utter nonsense, you may live in a pro-life bubble, the rest of us live in reality and know better.
Click to expand...

I don't think we can survive all the "good" you guys do for us and our society.
 
CurtisNeeley said:
Opinion and Order PDF

The ruling is counter to US law and V-O-I-D when rendered and will NOT be enforced pending Appeal if handled properly.

This ruling repeats the same legal mistake made in Citizens United, which Hon. Antonin Scalia apologized to me for making on February 26, 2015, before advising Citizens United would be fixed in due course by SCOTUS or Congress.

Corporations do NOT have the fundamental First Amendment individual right to speak nor the individual right to due process.

Corporations are routinely prohibited from exercising each of these "rights" all across America. Semi Honorable Michael R. Barrett will be identified as mistaken and/or biased in a few months and then will be corrected by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals by Christmas 2016.
Click to expand...

Oops. This decision was the proper operation of law and was NOT void. This ruling protected the right of a woman to kill a zygote, blastocyst or embryo. Each of these are parasitic "growths" caused by spermatozoa and are not new individual human beings yet. These may be frozen and be used later and in some cases by a surrogate female long after the biological parents have died.

Once the placenta produces the progesterone needed to allow gestation to continue and replaces the monthly corpus luteum, the new individual human(s) ha(s/ve) formed from the two. See "......and they shall be one flesh." - Genesis 2:24

A live human Fetus exists initially only while supported by umbilical life-support. The Fetus should be granted human dignity and be protected by the State, though not yet able to be born from 8-24 weeks. This time varies from 8 -14 weeks and is different for each pregnancy.

This scientific fact is described exactly by Genesis 2:24 linked above. This scientific physical truth was not known until 2013 when the fact the genes controlling development of the placenta were discovered to be from the father. Oh; Thanks Pop....
A regular old Act of Congress is now needed to define when a human Fetus should be protected as a person. No Constitutional Amendment is necessary. Arkansas Act 301 was very close to being an excellent example though male responsibility for pre-Fetus expense and decisions should have been split between the male and female.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom