• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberal Logic

legalimmigrant said:
One abortion = no problem. 1,000,000 abortions = big problem.

Those missing people are now being replaced by the scum from Latin America. Do you know that one-fifth of El Salvador and a quarter of Mexico is already here and more are coming? They come here to overrun your schools, hospitals and prisons, and bring with them diseases, drugs and crime. What a deal.

On the list of the top 20 world's worst hellholes with the highest murder rates, 18 are south of your border with Mexico, which is wide open for cheap labor and to support the biggest Ponzi scheme ever - the Social Security system that is going broke unable to keep up with the aging US population. For comparison, during the entire WW2, the US casualties were about 500,000. Today, it takes only 6 months of war on babies to match that head count. BTW, do fetuses have heads?

Now, it's your turn to show us those mysterious and so well documented benefits to the society. Go.
Click to expand...

Thank you, NAFTA.
 
moon1336 said:
Liberal Logic:

Anti-gun legislation will stop gun violence, but anti-abortion legislation won't stop abortions.

Yeah, doesn't make sense to me, either.
Click to expand...

Thats a rather dumb comparison, couldn't you just flip it:

Conservative Logic:

Anti-abortion legislation will stop abortions, but anti-gun legislation won't stop gun violence.
 
Moot said:
Pencils can kill people...and words can incite violence. :shrug:
Click to expand...

ban pencils and continue to stop other from talking simply because you don't agree , that the liberal way . :roll:
 
moon1336 said:
Liberal Logic:

Anti-gun legislation will stop gun violence, but anti-abortion legislation won't stop abortions.

Yeah, doesn't make sense to me, either.
Click to expand...

Gezzzzzzzzus, you just can't stop making illogical comments.
 
Socrates1 said:
ban pencils and continue to stop other from talking simply because you don't agree , that the liberal way . :roll:
Click to expand...

The word "ban" seems to come up more in conservative logic than it does liberals. It's practically the first thing that comes out of their mouth...oh wait. :roll:



Conservatives are also more inclined to want books, movies and video games banned...

Health & Life - Adults Are More Likely To Believe There Are Books That Should Be Banned Than Movies, Television Shows, or Video Games
 
Scrabaholic said:
Are you saying that without legal abortion, those people would not be immigrating?
Click to expand...

Those people are not immigrating. They are criminals who trespass, forge Social Security documents, steal, work illegally, rape and murder. I immigrated by following every single law and rule.

Without abortions, there would be 50,000,000 million more Americans, and the justification to let foreigners to come here would simply not exist.
 
legalimmigrant said:
Those people are not immigrating. They are criminals who trespass, forge Social Security documents, steal, work illegally, rape and murder. I immigrated by following every single law and rule.

Without abortions, there would be 50,000,000 million more Americans, and the justification to let foreigners to come here would simply not exist.
Click to expand...

So your saying we should become East Germany on steroids?
 
minnie616 said:
Assault weapons were designed for military assault.
Not for hunting nor for protection.
Click to expand...

Nobody who is not authorized by the feds can legally buy or posses an assault weapon. "Assault weapons" the liberals bitch about are not assault weapons at all, but merely a more scary-looking semi-automatics. BTW, my very legal Beretta holds 16.
 
Last edited:
Moot said:
The word "ban" seems to come up more in conservative logic than it does liberals. It's practically the first thing that comes out of their mouth...oh wait. :roll:

Conservatives are also more inclined to want books, movies and video games banned...

Health & Life - Adults Are More Likely To Believe There Are Books That Should Be Banned Than Movies, Television Shows, or Video Games
Click to expand...

Banning is an evil happily practiced by the communists, fascists, the American leftist students and professors at colleges and universities, global warming fanatics, Trump haters, etc. In Canada and Western Europe, the liberal loons passed enough anti-free speech laws to make me a criminal for just a fraction of my posts here. Luckily, this is the US where the liberals are still unable to throw me in prison.
 
legalimmigrant said:
If you already know the answer, I will not bother. Bye.
Click to expand...

So in other words, yes, you do want to turn the United States into East Germany on steroids in an attempt to keep out foreigners. Ignoring the fact that if you go far enough back everyone is a foreigner. Good to know.
 
legalimmigrant said:
Banning is an evil happily practiced by the communists, fascists, the American leftist students and professors at colleges and universities, global warming fanatics, Trump haters, etc. In Canada and Western Europe, the liberal loons passed enough anti-free speech laws to make me a criminal for just a fraction of my posts here. Luckily, this is the US where the liberals are still unable to throw me in prison.
Click to expand...

Republicans banned the term "climate change" in Florida.

In Florida, officials ban term 'climate change' | Miami Herald


Trump wants to ban Muslims in US. Recently, his supporters organized and sent a barrage of threatening and anti-Semitic tweets to a journalist that wrote an article in GQ about "Empress Melania". Trump himself has advocated for the right to sue journalists he disagrees with... aka ban free speech.

Journalist who profiled Melania Trump hit with barrage of antisemitic abuse | US news | The Guardian
 
Last edited:
Moot said:
Republicans banned the term "climate change" in Florida.

In Florida, officials ban term 'climate change' | Miami Herald


Trump wants to ban Muslims in US. Recently, his supporters organized and sent a barrage of threatening and anti-Semitic tweets to a journalist that wrote an article in GQ about "Empress Melania". Trump himself has advocated for the right to sue journalists he disagrees with... aka ban free speech.

Journalist who profiled Melania Trump hit with barrage of antisemitic abuse | US news | The Guardian
Click to expand...

The mulatto banned "Islamic".
 
legalimmigrant said:
Those people are not immigrating. They are criminals who trespass, forge Social Security documents, steal, work illegally, rape and murder. I immigrated by following every single law and rule.

Without abortions, there would be 50,000,000 million more Americans, and the justification to let foreigners to come here would simply not exist.
Click to expand...

Your post didn't make it clear you were talking about illegal immigration.

If you truly think that making abortion illegal would stop it, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Your post didn't make it clear you were talking about illegal immigration.

If you truly think that making abortion illegal would stop it, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
Click to expand...

My post is as clear as a bell.

No need for if-ing. I never made that claim.

Keep the bridge. It's probably so rusty, it would cost me more to fix it than it's worth.
 
Scrabaholic said:
Evidently not.

Yes, you did.
Click to expand...

"Those people are not immigrating. They are criminals who trespass,..." Who do you think I am referring to? Queen Elizabeth coming to visit?

"Without abortions, there would be 50,000,000 million more Americans, and the justification to let foreigners to come here would simply not exist. These criminals are not coming to the US. Only to the border. Beyond that, it is the American criminal government that is deliberately letting the scum in. See the difference? How is this equal to the alleged claim of mine that making abortion illegal would stop illegal immigration?

If you are still unable to understand my very simple English, this conversation is over.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Correlation is not causation.
Click to expand...

But by the same token, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation. It's as if you're claiming that if there's a correlation, it must not be connected to the causation in any way whatsoever.

Much of scientific evidence is based upon a correlation of variables[20] – they are observed to occur together. Scientists are careful to point out that correlation does not necessarily mean causation. The assumption that A causes B simply because A correlates with B is often not accepted as a legitimate form of argument.

However, sometimes people commit the opposite fallacy – dismissing correlation entirely, as if it does not suggest causation at all. This would dismiss a large swath of important scientific evidence.[20] Since it may be difficult or ethically impossible to run controlled double-blind studies, correlational evidence from several different angles may be the strongest causal evidence available.[21] The combination of limited available methodologies with the dismissing correlation fallacy has on occasion been used to counter a scientific finding. For example, the tobacco industry has historically relied on a dismissal of correlational evidence to reject a link between tobacco and lung cancer.[22]

Correlation is a valuable type of scientific evidence in fields such as medicine, psychology, and sociology. But first correlations must be confirmed as real, and then every possible causative relationship must be systematically explored. In the end correlation can be used as powerful evidence for a cause-and-effect relationship between a treatment and benefit, a risk factor and a disease, or a social or economic factor and various outcomes. But it is also one of the most abused types of evidence, because it is easy and even tempting to come to premature conclusions based upon the preliminary appearance of a correlation.
 
Fletch said:
What sort of 'reasonable regulation' on abortion does the democrat platform support?
Click to expand...

Read the platform. Would you accept an regulation on guns reasonable.
 
Henrin said:
Of course they can't define reasonable restriction to any acceptable level. Also, do you realize that assault weapons are guns?
Click to expand...

Read my post. His post had to do with some insane implication that dems want all guns out of the hands of civilians. That is oft repeated and a flat out lie.
 
year2late said:
Read my post. His post had to do with some insane implication that dems want all guns out of the hands of civilians. That is oft repeated and a flat out lie.
Click to expand...

I have seen no proof that democrats don't want to ban all guns. :shrug:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom