• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge bars enforcement of new abortion restrictions

Scrabaholic

certified batshit crazy
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,375
Reaction score
19,408
Location
Near Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
LITTLE ROCK — A federal judge Monday issued a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of a new state law restricting use of the abortion pill until a lawsuit challenging the law is resolved.

snip

In a 70-page order, Baker questioned the value of requiring an abortion clinic to have a contract with a doctor with hospital admitting privileges.

“Given the record evidence presented at this stage, the court is skeptical about any benefit conferred by this provision. Instead, this court at this stage and on the record before it tends to agree with the district judge who considered a similar restriction in Wisconsin and determined that the contracted physician requirement was a ‘solution in search of a problem,”” Baker said in the order.

Judge bars enforcement of new abortion restrictions | Arkansas News


==========================================

Once again, reason and common sense prevail. Yet, the AG's office insists the law is needed, even though there is no evidence of women being harmed because of doctors not having admitting privileges. Just totally ridiculous and they (the AG's office) are making themselves look bad, not to mention wasting taxpayer money.
 
Judge bars enforcement of new abortion restrictions | Arkansas News


==========================================

Once again, reason and common sense prevail. Yet, the AG's office insists the law is needed, even though there is no evidence of women being harmed because of doctors not having admitting privileges. Just totally ridiculous and they (the AG's office) are making themselves look bad, not to mention wasting taxpayer money.

If only there were real men running my state, who would ignore this Satan.
 
If only there were real men running my state, who would ignore this Satan.

lGiX9Fr.png
 
If only there were real men running my state, who would ignore this Satan.

what does that even mean?
Please avoid spamming with such claptraps!
 
what does that even mean?
Please avoid spamming with such claptraps!

1. The leaders of Arkansas are cowards.
2. If the leaders of Arkansas were not cowards, they would ignore this mirderous judge.
 
1. The leaders of Arkansas are cowards.
2. If the leaders of Arkansas were not cowards, they would ignore this mirderous judge.

Yeah that's what I thought, claptrap!
Beside, what business do you have commenting about what's going on in other women's wombs! Does "mind your own business" mean anything to you? I mean for God's sake.... enough already!
 
Yeah that's what I thought, claptrap!
Beside, what business do you have commenting about what's going on in other women's wombs! Does "mind your own business" mean anything to you? I mean for God's sake.... enough already!

Homicide is the state's business.
 
Except that the US Supreme Court has ruled OTHERWISE, i.e abortion does not qualify as an homicide. So is there a provision that i am not privy to? o_0
 
Except that the US Supreme Court has ruled OTHERWISE, i.e abortion does not qualify as an homicide. So is there a provision that i am not privy to? o_0

The point is, if the state's leaders weren't cowards, they'd ignore that ruling.
 
Back
Top Bottom