You've avoided the question. Why hasn't the good folks of the world who cherish children so much allow 10 MILLION CHILDREN under the age of 5 TO DIE EACH YEAR? This isn't a new problem. If we can't take care of the born, why should we be stacking up exponential numbers of children who will NOT be adequately cared for?
We have a similar problem right here in the good old U.S.A. We have a substantial number of Pro-Life who cry their hearts out over all of the abortions and at the very same time are screaming at government for the misuse of their tax dollars and want to terminate or substantially reduce social services that impacts the lives of children, who can't fend for themselves, who don't have a political voice to stand up to government. To me, this is beyond hypocrisy. Save the fetuses and **** the born kid, they're on their own.
Death of the born come in so many ways and yet, it's impossible to really know how all of the deaths (individually or collectively) truly impact humanity in the long run. You can't possibly provide any kind of outcome for all of the yet to be born's impact on humanity...good, bad, or indifferent. If something never existed there is no impact.
About 20 percent of all conception are disposed of by women's bodies. Is this a third wrong for you?
And apparently you have decided that for whatever reason the yet born are somehow more valuable than the born, but more in particular women.
And apparently you have decided that "quantity of life" is more important than "quality of life".
No avoidance whatsoever. You just didn't like the answer. So lets say I snap my fingers, all abortions are allowed now for anybody at anytime that wants one, no even hints of disgust or murmurs about it from my side. What HAVE YOU AND YOUR SIDE done in the meantime about all these babies suffering from preventable deaths around the world? Nothing, your side is just using them as a prop for your side of the debate, plain and simple. Your side cares about as much about them as your side does the unborn.
Most of us on the Pro-life side also have a heart for the multitudes of children that are the truly unwanted byproduct of a Socialist Welfare system that has for many years and still encourages young girls, not as they should encourage to concentrate on school and at minimum graduate from high school, wait until after high school then marry and only then to have children. You know, those prudent steps that will keep them and their children from becoming one of the poverty statistics, continued sad suffering with little further incentive to do much of anything. Nope, they no longer need a man, a partner long term, they only need the government to provide for them. What kind of nonfamily building message do you think that has sent?
Now that the left has started and encourages this kind of family dysfunction, its hard to clean up the mess without just stopping it cold turkey. Perhaps we should phase it in, tell girls in middle school that the well is running/has run dry, that they will most likely have to take care of their kids some other fashion...either do something like that or else you are just continuing the dismal cycle to spiral even further downward.
Yep, a bit of tough love, because of a predicament created by the oh so caring left, unfortunately one of the only prudent solutions to the suffering and misery that would otherwise just continue on into the foreseeable future. Your side decries the hard solution that your side has forced upon society.
I dont much care for our options now either, but to just keep killing babies is certainly not the solution.
oh, and...
Dont know what you mean by a third wrong for me with the 20 percent. Explain.
And, I have not decided any such thing, I say let both live, the born and conscious just need to be responsible for what they create.
And, I havent decided anything about quantity vs quality either, but I will now. One can have both as, again, there is no necessity of an either or proposition. But by the very nature of the way you are putting this together, you are in effect saying
you are deciding that so called quality is more important than quantity of life, that the born only for the reason that they were allowed to be born are somehow superior to those who have not yet been but are on their way to being born...
You think your side just gets to make all the rules concerning such matters. Who made ya'll the queens? We dont have a queendom, we have a representative democracy. Remember?
