Re: Pro-Life Attorney: ‘We Need a Nuremberg for Abortion Doctors’
Nope. You removed exactly what I said you removed.
Because I already had what you said I removed. I removed a duplicate, not your position. I've said this multiple times now. For someone who seems to have no problem ignoring my actual arguments in favor of created straw men, you sure are really hung up on me not saying twice your position.
Yes, it very plainly was. You can't tapdance around that truth.
No, it was not. I find it hilarious you're complaining that I "ignored context" because I didn't post your position twice in the same post, but now you have completely ignored my position, even though I've provided it many times.
Methinks the pot ought not call the kettle black.
Again, sorry for assuming you were posting about the thread topic in any way.
We were talking about the thread topic. Who said we weren't? As I have already said, and I see you have once again ignored, it was a conversation loosely related to the thread topic, a conversation which arose somewhat organically. Just because it was about something related to the thread topic, that doesn't mean it wasn't about the thread topic.
I think it's hilarious how you keep claiming I misrepresented you because I didn't post the same thing twice, while you have now repeatedly misrepresented what I've said, even though I've corrected it multiple times.
I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about the thread topic. It's that simple.
I am posting about the thread topic.
But we were talking about a different tangent of the thread topic. So for you to claim we were wrong when you didn't bother to understand what we were talking about is quite head scratching.
I noticed, of course. It wasn't appropriate,
And I was not a part of it.
and your plain as day implications and accusations were not accurate.
I very explicitly mentioned it had nothing to do with any one particular poster. Once more, you ignore the context.
Having established that your claims about me were false, I am satisfied.
Since I didn't make any claims about you, I'm not exactly sure where you are coming from here. But whatever makes you happy.
And so is accurate. Pro choice very much exists.
The label of "pro-choice" which pro-abortion folks claim for themselves has always been a misnomer; it implies something inaccurate about them and something inaccurate about their opponents.
Umm...no, it just means they believe a person or couple should have the right to choose what is best for them. You labeling those who are pro-choice as being pro-abortion is downright offensive, and is the kind of rhetoric which would lead a person to suspect one is an extremist. I don't want babies to be aborted and I would never do it myself. But I'm not arrogant or tyrannical enough to assume my opinions and desires are more important than everyone else's opinions and desires. And I would hope no one else would feel that way either.
I'm pro choice, not pro abortion. And I try to be as pro life as I can, though I freely admit there are times and situations where I'm okay with someone dying. You thinking pro choice and pro abortion are the same is silly. I'm sure there are pro abortion people, but not many. There are pro abortion, pro choice, pro life and anti choice people out there. They are completely distinct categories.
I'm not even sure how if you're not interested in debating the legality of abortion
I was interested in addressing the concept of extremism on the subject of abortion, a conversation which arose during discussion of whether or not we should punish those who engage in them.
Once more, if you would read the posts before you responded, it would save everyone a lot of time.
