Ladies and gentlemen, the issue of pain is a logical fallacy. It's a red herring just like the issues of personhood, sentience, viability, birth, citizenship, etc.... Don't fall for the pro-abortion ruse and be misled in a wild goose chase that leads you far away from the actual and the only relevant issue of what a human prenatal life is.
If it's not a human being, who cares what pro-abortion crowd want to do to it. We don't protest at the liposuction clinics or cancer treatment wards, do we?
Why? Because we know those were just human tissues. We are scientifically educated and informed. They aren't. Or they are simply being deceptive.
If it is a human being at conception, then you can't kill a human being without just cause, PERIOD, no matter your circumstances or boo-hoo-isms.
The ability to feel pain or be cognitively aware of it is merely a neurophysiological event. It's development during the prenatal course of life is present in all mammals. It's absence is either pending or due to genetic defects.
The ability of my dog to feel and be aware of pain, even possessing the ability to cognitively recall past experience, does not transform my dog into a human being or a human person, does it?
Children who are conceived and born with congenital inability to feel pain with anhidrosis (CIPA) due to a simple genetic mutation that prevents sensory neurons to develop and survive, does not mean that those children are not human beings or human persons, does it?
The children's inability to feel pain for moral being is a reason for extra parental and caregiver attention and protection. However, in pro-abortion principle, every deficiency that could be used is hijacked and turned upside down against the prenatal human life for its self-serving cause. Instead of providing extra care and protection, they used it to justify for their killing.
Isn't that disgusting?
OK, ladies and gentlemen, I hereby present you the world's most famous tap dancing performance. Now, let the show begin.
)
