- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 31,009
- Reaction score
- 9,029
- Location
- The Lone Star State.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
It's possible you may need to go to a state other than Texas to kill your baby in the near future.
It's possible you may need to go to a state other than Texas to kill your baby in the near future.
It's possible you may need to go to a state other than Texas to kill your baby in the near future.
Only if Texas wishes to continue to violate the US Constitution.
Good to see those 2 aren't bothered by the seriousness of what they're doing.
Please don't defame the United States Constitution with such heinous lies.
Anyone who has worked in or around the medical field should be appropriately aware of the desensitizing nature of the field. Please do not judge someone for how they appear to approach a private conversation that you deem reprehensible or sensitive without taking this fact into account.
I'm hoping they can go on to a different field after these clinics are put out of business.
I personally wouldn't want to work in a profession where I had to *desensitize just to deal with the job.
Access to this particular medical procedure is a right granted to women under the umbrella right of privacy from the United States Constitution.
There's no guarantee that the 'procedure' has to be available in every state, especially if the clinics in question are breaking federal and state laws.
Then it is a good thing you aren't involved in the Police field, the medical field, or the psychiatric field....hopefully.
Which of those fields involve killing/dissecting babies and selling their parts?
Anyone who has worked in or around the medical field should be appropriately aware of the desensitizing nature of the field. Please do not judge someone for how they appear to approach a private conversation that you deem reprehensible or sensitive without taking this fact into account.
Access to this particular medical procedure is a right granted to women under the umbrella right of privacy from the United States Constitution.
There is no "constitutional right to privacy."
Killing another human being for a client is not a medical procedure. That service has another name.
Absolutely there is such a guarantee.
They're talking about the human beings they've killed for money.
Ethical healthcare providers do not intentionally kill human beings under their care.
Please keep that in mind.
Show me.
I am very curious - how do you reconcile your alleged "libertarian" belief system with the fact that you want the government to dictate what women do during their pregnancy?
So you don't like your right to privacy?
I am very curious - how do you reconcile your alleged "libertarian" belief system with the fact that you want the government to dictate what women do during their pregnancy?
"The very same 5th Circuit appeals court ruled differently on a similar law in Mississippi, saying that women there had a constitutional right to an abortion in the state where they live."
I should note that this quote comes from an article reporting on how the 5th circuit upheld the Texas law on the closing of one of the clinics specifically because the women could travel across state lines to New Mexico relatively easily. So perhaps it might (or might not) be correct to say that they must have access to abortion within the State, but access to abortion within a reasonable distance.
The Supreme Court will likely settle this point relatively soon.