• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12, 85, 357]

Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

then CNN, msnbc, abc, cbs, huffpo, dailykos, mediamatters etc are in no way legitimate new sources. they are nothing more than left wing screech machines.

To YOU, they are. So what. I consider CNN, MSNBC, and the other news sources to be far more reliable than Fox NOISE.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

To YOU, they are. So what. I consider CNN, MSNBC, and the other news sources to be far more reliable than Fox NOISE.

then you have a double standard so TO YOU fox news is what you describe that means it is opinion and really holds no weight. if you want to quote cnn and huffpo and daily kos and media matters etc.. as sources and consider them reliable then we can quote fox and consider it reliable.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

That doesn't excuse the criminal acts of the teens. Funny how everyone is saying "Theft is theft" but no one seems to realize that "Trespass is trespass" and "False imprisonment is false imprisonment". Suddenly, people seem to think that criminal acts can be excused based on someone else's behavior

I wonder if they can see the hypocrisy

They had the video of the person in possession of their poster. They could have shown the police and had them take it from there. That would be rational. And if they destroyed the poster, they could be taken to small claims court for the cost of the poster back.

But trespassing and preventing them from moving? . It is a no brainer that someone who is cornered and prevented from moving will attempt to get out of that situation.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

It's not wrong, it's just stupid. Very stupid. It's a waste of time.

Some people think the study of religion is stupid and a waste of time.

Should they eliminate those classes?
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

It's not wrong, it's just stupid. Very stupid. It's a waste of time.

Learning about women's history and feminist movements is stupid? :shock:
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

Some people think the study of religion is stupid and a waste of time.

Should they eliminate those classes?

You can't study the constitution without realizing there was a significant feminist movement in the US.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

Some people think the study of religion is stupid and a waste of time.

Should they eliminate those classes?

Yes. Bible studies as a college course or any religious studies in a college that isn't a theological college is stupid and a waste of time.
Actually, religion should be eliminated as a class even in highschool for all state schools.

Learning about women's history and feminist movements is stupid? :shock:

Same reply really, yes, as a college course or even in highschool, yes, it's stupid. And before highschool it's not an appropriate course.
There is no such thing as womens' history anymore than there is mens' history. There is history of a country or of a continent or of the world. there is art history. There is musical history. there is political history. There is literary history. There is no such thing as gender history. Generally speaking, history is history, complete, total, full. Not cut down into bite size news... that's the source of so much of peoples' ignorance in regards to history. They only get to see a narrow view of it instead of the whole picture. You don't need to know all the history, god knows it's too much... but just being good in one period of it will give you the right mentality on how to approach it in regards to everything else.

College is supposed to prepare you for life. Well, ideally, all education should... but lets not get too ambitious and just say college. A good set of skills for the marketplace. Where does feminist studies go in there? And also, feminist studies != womens' studies whatever that may be... I mean, if womens' studies mean anything aside from a biological course into female anatomy and biology... then you know, everything else is bollocks.

College needs to teach people things that are of value in life. Being a feminist is worthless and nobody will pay you to be a feminist because there is no such a job on the marketplace that generates profit. I make web apps for a living. I create something that people are willing to pay me for because that in turn will help them make more money. I generate stuff that has value. A feminist generates... what that as value. Nothing. Its' useless and therefore the only reason it exists is because there are people stupid enough to pay money for a college degree in that... just like people are willing to pay money to go to college to get a degree in liberal arts or to sit around and analyze poems of someone dead for 400 years. Yes, the Dead Poets Society was a fantastic movie but those were pre-university prep school and Red Forman had the right idea for his son to become a profession that is actually worthwhile. Poetry was a relaxation thing, not a thing that you can make a living out off. I hope I got my point across.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

You have a weird way of looking at studying history and religion. You see, the other poster brought up religion and you responded as if she said Christian bible study. Furthermore, you can't just lump all history studies under the label history. College courses aren't even offered like that. People specialize in studying certain areas of study: revolutionary history, medieval warfare, Ottoman Empire, Islamic history, the Christian reformation, etc., and yes, even the history and social status of women in societies.

Studying the advancement of women in society is not a waste of time. It's a huge part of the US constitution and the story of America. Maybe you can't appreciate that because you're not American, and because you obviously have some sort of white male complex that causes you to irrationally feel offended and left out. However, feminism has a role in the current world and the writings and works of long past feminists speak loudly to women now, especially in the Middle East.






Yes. Bible studies as a college course or any religious studies in a college that isn't a theological college is stupid and a waste of time.
Actually, religion should be eliminated as a class even in highschool for all state schools.



Same reply really, yes, as a college course or even in highschool, yes, it's stupid. And before highschool it's not an appropriate course.
There is no such thing as womens' history anymore than there is mens' history. There is history of a country or of a continent or of the world. there is art history. There is musical history. there is political history. There is literary history. There is no such thing as gender history. Generally speaking, history is history, complete, total, full. Not cut down into bite size news... that's the source of so much of peoples' ignorance in regards to history. They only get to see a narrow view of it instead of the whole picture. You don't need to know all the history, god knows it's too much... but just being good in one period of it will give you the right mentality on how to approach it in regards to everything else.

College is supposed to prepare you for life. Well, ideally, all education should... but lets not get too ambitious and just say college. A good set of skills for the marketplace. Where does feminist studies go in there? And also, feminist studies != womens' studies whatever that may be... I mean, if womens' studies mean anything aside from a biological course into female anatomy and biology... then you know, everything else is bollocks.

College needs to teach people things that are of value in life. Being a feminist is worthless and nobody will pay you to be a feminist because there is no such a job on the marketplace that generates profit. I make web apps for a living. I create something that people are willing to pay me for because that in turn will help them make more money. I generate stuff that has value. A feminist generates... what that as value. Nothing. Its' useless and therefore the only reason it exists is because there are people stupid enough to pay money for a college degree in that... just like people are willing to pay money to go to college to get a degree in liberal arts or to sit around and analyze poems of someone dead for 400 years. Yes, the Dead Poets Society was a fantastic movie but those were pre-university prep school and Red Forman had the right idea for his son to become a profession that is actually worthwhile. Poetry was a relaxation thing, not a thing that you can make a living out off. I hope I got my point across.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

From The College Fix:

SANTA BARBARA – A department of feminist studies professor has been accused of going berserk after coming across a campus prolife demonstration that used extremely graphic displays, leading a small mob of students to chant “tear down the sign” before grabbing one of the signs, storming off with it, then allegedly engaging in an altercation with a 16-year-old prolife protestor who had followed the educator to retrieve it. Feminist Studies Professor Accused of Assaulting Teenage Prolife Demonstrator

According to the article, some UCSB students are upset that "groups [of protestors] are threatening the well-being of students, yet nothing is being done. We should not feel unsafe on our own campus. These acts of shaming and violence are beyond unacceptable, and in no case have these groups warned the student body before showing such images on campus.”

I am very much opposed to the display of graphic images--they're gratuitous, and those happening to walk past the photo/poster displays may find them shocking. Children definitely shouldn't be exposed to them. Perhaps some compromise can be reached, one through which the protestors don't put these horrific images on public display. But I don't believe for even a second that the complaining UCSB students feel unsafe on their own campus. What hanky-clutching crap.

As for the prof, she appears to be hoist by her own irrational behavior. :3oops:

You basically have two groups of idiots going at each other. Both should be criticized IMO. The protesters should not be displaying graphic signage on campus. This is a campus issue and should be ruled on by the campus. If they do not want offensive or graphic imagery displayed on campus publicly then they should have rules governing that. On the flip side of that, the enforcement of these standards should be dealt with lawfully. You should not be allowed to steal someone else's property from them or assault them in the process..
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

You have a weird way of looking at studying history and religion. You see, the other poster brought up religion and you responded as if she said Christian bible study. Furthermore, you can't just lump all history studies under the label history. College courses aren't even offered like that. People specialize in studying certain areas of study: revolutionary history, medieval warfare, Ottoman Empire, Islamic history, the Christian reformation, etc., and yes, even the history and social status of women in societies.

Studying the advancement of women in society is not a waste of time. It's a huge part of the US constitution and the story of America. Maybe you can't appreciate that because you're not American, and because you obviously have some sort of white male complex that causes you to irrationally feel offended and left out. However, feminism has a role in the current world and the writings and works of long past feminists speak loudly to women now, especially in the Middle East.

I agree.
Thanks for clarifying I brought up studying religion not Bible studies.

When I mentioned study of religion I was actually thinking about the study of any one or more of the different great religions in the world .

I also agree that feminism does have a big role in the past and in our current world .
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

I do not agree with the poster being take either. But following them in campus areas where they do not belong and preventing them from moving is kicking it up about twenty notches.

Agreed. They should have called the cops and waited for them to arrive.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

As he said, studying should help you prepare for life and go into the world. You need to be well rounded, and you won't be well rounded if you try to study the constitution and ignore the history of feminism in the USA. You need to understand the difference between Shiva and Buddha, you need to know the difference between Sunni and Shi'ite, and if you're Christian and study the Bible, it helps to know about western civilization: study the maps and the empires mentioned.

Learning about ancient civilizations and religions has always been interesting to me.

Learning about gender in ancient societies, foreign cultures, and through science and evolution is not taboo or dangerous either. Its fascinating.

It just seems anti intellectual to condemn studying anything at all.


I agree.
Thanks for clarifying I brought up studying religion not Bible studies.

When I mentioned study of religion I was actually thinking about the study of any one or more of the different great religions in the world .

I also agree that feminism does have a big role in the past and in our current world .
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

That doesn't excuse the criminal acts of the teens. Funny how everyone is saying "Theft is theft" but no one seems to realize that "Trespass is trespass" and "False imprisonment is false imprisonment". Suddenly, people seem to think that criminal acts can be excused based on someone else's behavior

I wonder if they can see the hypocrisy

If you are referring to me saying 'theft is theft', I have said they should have called the cops and waited for them. As for trespass, we don't know if those areas allow public access or not. Until we do, I am not commenting either way on that particular issue.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

Yes. Bible studies as a college course or any religious studies in a college that isn't a theological college is stupid and a waste of time.
Actually, religion should be eliminated as a class even in highschool for all state schools.



Same reply really, yes, as a college course or even in highschool, yes, it's stupid. And before highschool it's not an appropriate course.
There is no such thing as womens' history anymore than there is mens' history. There is history of a country or of a continent or of the world. there is art history. There is musical history. there is political history. There is literary history. There is no such thing as gender history. Generally speaking, history is history, complete, total, full. Not cut down into bite size news... that's the source of so much of peoples' ignorance in regards to history. They only get to see a narrow view of it instead of the whole picture. You don't need to know all the history, god knows it's too much... but just being good in one period of it will give you the right mentality on how to approach it in regards to everything else.

College is supposed to prepare you for life. Well, ideally, all education should... but lets not get too ambitious and just say college. A good set of skills for the marketplace. Where does feminist studies go in there? And also, feminist studies != womens' studies whatever that may be... I mean, if womens' studies mean anything aside from a biological course into female anatomy and biology... then you know, everything else is bollocks.

College needs to teach people things that are of value in life. Being a feminist is worthless and nobody will pay you to be a feminist because there is no such a job on the marketplace that generates profit. I make web apps for a living. I create something that people are willing to pay me for because that in turn will help them make more money. I generate stuff that has value. A feminist generates... what that as value. Nothing. Its' useless and therefore the only reason it exists is because there are people stupid enough to pay money for a college degree in that... just like people are willing to pay money to go to college to get a degree in liberal arts or to sit around and analyze poems of someone dead for 400 years. Yes, the Dead Poets Society was a fantastic movie but those were pre-university prep school and Red Forman had the right idea for his son to become a profession that is actually worthwhile. Poetry was a relaxation thing, not a thing that you can make a living out off. I hope I got my point across.

What does it matter to you what courses people take in college? Personally, I don't understand some of them either, but it's none of my business. There may be a need that I haven't thought of, and those subjects obviously interest some people, so if they want to take the courses, that's their right.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

He doesn't think it creates wealth or that such people can get jobs. A lot of them are sociologists, anthropologists, and researchers, and write publications and studies. They are paid to lecture and instruct, and drive knowledge and understanding. He doesn't see it for himself though.




What does it matter to you what courses people take in college? Personally, I don't understand some of them either, but it's none of my business. There may be a need that I haven't thought of, and those subjects obviously interest some people, so if they want to take the courses, that's their right.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

You have a weird way of looking at studying history and religion. You see, the other poster brought up religion and you responded as if she said Christian bible study. Furthermore, you can't just lump all history studies under the label history. College courses aren't even offered like that. People specialize in studying certain areas of study: revolutionary history, medieval warfare, Ottoman Empire, Islamic history, the Christian reformation, etc., and yes, even the history and social status of women in societies.

Studying the advancement of women in society is not a waste of time. It's a huge part of the US constitution and the story of America. Maybe you can't appreciate that because you're not American, and because you obviously have some sort of white male complex that causes you to irrationally feel offended and left out. However, feminism has a role in the current world and the writings and works of long past feminists speak loudly to women now, especially in the Middle East.

No, I didn't. Look what I said:
Bible studies as a college course or any religious studies in a college that isn't a theological college is stupid and a waste of time.
Actually, religion should be eliminated as a class even in highschool for all state schools.

OR ANY OTHER RELIGIOUS STUDIES, I did correctly include everything there for all religious studies. If you're not a theological college, it's a big waste of time. Theological colleges are a waste of time too, but that's another issue all together.

I have also not lumped history studies all under one label or automatically assumed anything. I covered all my basis properly because I know what i'm talking about. Read what I wrote.

There is history of a country or of a continent or of the world. there is art history. There is musical history. there is political history. There is literary history. There is no such thing as gender history. Generally speaking, history is history, complete, total, full. Not cut down into bite size news... that's the source of so much of peoples' ignorance in regards to history. They only get to see a narrow view of it instead of the whole picture. You don't need to know all the history, god knows it's too much... but just being good in one period of it will give you the right mentality on how to approach it in regards to everything else.
But what I wrote still stands. You want to learn about Ottoman history, fine, but learn it in context. Don't just learn about the ottoman empire in and of itself. Learn about it from different perspectives, at differnet points in time and how it faired in comparison to it's neighbors. You want to read about the Christian reformation? fine, but you may also want to read about similar events in other religious just to get perspective. Like how Shia and Sunni came to exist as different branches of Islam or how neo confucianism came to exist, where, and how it was greeted.

You want to learn about the status of women in society, fine, but go for it with an interest to gain perspective. Learn about womens' status at different points in time in different nations and in different cultures around the world and also, while you're at it, learn how men behaved and how men were treated in different functions in multiple places in various time periods. that way, you actually learn something and not just thrive in isolationist ignorance. Get it?
It's the same thing with learning languages. You can't say you can appreciate english properly until you learn a foreign language. Same for all languages.

“You can never understand one language until you understand at least two.”

‒Geoffrey Willans

This is tumblr talk.You shouldn't take your talking points from tumblr. It's the stupidest place on the internet right now. I have no complex. I have no left out feeling and the duty and role of feminism in todays' world is debatable. I will tell you one thing. Those brave women in Saudi Arabia who are risking being beaten to death for having the audacity to DRIVE are not the same breed of feminists that you see today in most of the western world. Feminists, at least popular ones, in our society, are just money-grubbing power leeches who use populist rhetoric and hatemongering tactics to make a name and some fortune for themselves. Those women in the middle east who risk their own lives, literally risk their own lives, are not to be insulted by given the nametag "feminists" but rather the nametag "heroines", for that is what they are.


What does it matter to you what courses people take in college? Personally, I don't understand some of them either, but it's none of my business. There may be a need that I haven't thought of, and those subjects obviously interest some people, so if they want to take the courses, that's their right.

... It should matter to you buddy boy.

Student loans are easy to give and therefore a lot of students go and learn things like that... then you wonder why the student debt problem is a real deal.
If you were to say "ok, students can declare bankruptcy and not have to pay their student loans if they can't find a job because of what they learn in college" and not have them guarateed by the state as they are now, no bank will give loans to student who want to study feminism or womens' study or bible studies or some crap like that. No sir.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

No, I read what you said, and I reread what you said, and I still think you have a complex and I don't use tumblr. I also think you're short sighted and not making sense. You suddenly say, ok, fine, you want to learn about Sunni and Sh'ite... and then you go into tell everybody HOW TO LEARN and HOW TO APPROACH LEARNING. But you still stand by saying that college and university studies are not the time and place to study religions. Then what do you propose doing, everybody study such questions on their own free time???

You're about empty slogans like "college should prepare you for the world," but you want to control what people learn and study because YOU don't find certain knowledge useful. That's not about freedom of thought or about intellectualism. I simply don't respect that characteristic in anybody.

And furthermore, it's incredibly naive to suggest such areas of study do not contribute meaning in society or have no place as of a career choice.


Those women in Saudi Arabia are brave, which you know nothing about first hand, so don't try to throw it in my face. My grandmother went through similar things and lived in genocidal war zone where rape was used as a form of punishment and terrorism to control women. I know my heroes in this discussion, and I have worked with women who have been trafficked and forced into third world prostitution rings, beaten and raped. What the **** have you done for women, or for any woman that has risked more than you ever have for freedom? I am willing to bet nothing.

This discussion is not about you putting women into different categories and telling us we aren't ****. This conversation is about your ignorant attitude that studying women's progress is wrong and taboo. Obviously, you should study it, because you might find out, that in America, before women could vote, own property, or work, they quoted the founding fathers. They didn't go back and try to find feminists from dark corners of history. Women's freedom is about ****ing freedom and nothing else. If a woman in Saudi Arabia can't quote the Saudi Royal Family, but she finds inspiration in quotes from American feminists, then good for her. It isn't about women versus men. It's about freedom. A woman's voice is just as strong in that struggle.





No, I didn't. Look what I said:


OR ANY OTHER RELIGIOUS STUDIES, I did correctly include everything there for all religious studies. If you're not a theological college, it's a big waste of time. Theological colleges are a waste of time too, but that's another issue all together.

I have also not lumped history studies all under one label or automatically assumed anything. I covered all my basis properly because I know what i'm talking about. Read what I wrote.


But what I wrote still stands. You want to learn about Ottoman history, fine, but learn it in context. Don't just learn about the ottoman empire in and of itself. Learn about it from different perspectives, at differnet points in time and how it faired in comparison to it's neighbors. You want to read about the Christian reformation? fine, but you may also want to read about similar events in other religious just to get perspective. Like how Shia and Sunni came to exist as different branches of Islam or how neo confucianism came to exist, where, and how it was greeted.

You want to learn about the status of women in society, fine, but go for it with an interest to gain perspective. Learn about womens' status at different points in time in different nations and in different cultures around the world and also, while you're at it, learn how men behaved and how men were treated in different functions in multiple places in various time periods. that way, you actually learn something and not just thrive in isolationist ignorance. Get it?
It's the same thing with learning languages. You can't say you can appreciate english properly until you learn a foreign language. Same for all languages.

“You can never understand one language until you understand at least two.”

‒Geoffrey Willans

This is tumblr talk.You shouldn't take your talking points from tumblr. It's the stupidest place on the internet right now. I have no complex. I have no left out feeling and the duty and role of feminism in todays' world is debatable. I will tell you one thing. Those brave women in Saudi Arabia who are risking being beaten to death for having the audacity to DRIVE are not the same breed of feminists that you see today in most of the western world. Feminists, at least popular ones, in our society, are just money-grubbing power leeches who use populist rhetoric and hatemongering tactics to make a name and some fortune for themselves. Those women in the middle east who risk their own lives, literally risk their own lives, are not to be insulted by given the nametag "feminists" but rather the nametag "heroines", for that is what they are.




... It should matter to you buddy boy.

Student loans are easy to give and therefore a lot of students go and learn things like that... then you wonder why the student debt problem is a real deal.
If you were to say "ok, students can declare bankruptcy and not have to pay their student loans if they can't find a job because of what they learn in college" and not have them guarateed by the state as they are now, no bank will give loans to student who want to study feminism or womens' study or bible studies or some crap like that. No sir.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

Look at the video and come back and tell me who has the poster.

"I may be a theif, but your a terrorist".

Pretty much admitting it right there. Which is why the investigation must take place. An educator on University campus cannot be allowed to instigate assault and thought oppression against students and visitors to the University. Particularly when political dissent and protest is at stake. Sorry, it's supposed to be an institute of enlightenment and free thinking; not draconian thought control because a professor doesn't like a topic being discussed.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

Agreed. They should have called the cops and waited for them to arrive.

Yes, I agree. But the girl who chased after her sign is only 16, and the other protestors are also young people. The so-called "grownup"...the representative of her university...wasn't.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

No, I read what you said, and I reread what you said, and I still think you have a complex and I don't use tumblr. I also think you're short sighted and not making sense. You suddenly say, ok, fine, you want to learn about Sunni and Sh'ite... and then you go into tell everybody HOW TO LEARN and HOW TO APPROACH LEARNING. But you still stand by saying that college and university studies are not the time and place to study religions. Then what do you propose doing, everybody study such questions on their own free time???

You're about empty slogans like "college should prepare you for the world," but you want to control what people learn and study because YOU don't find certain knowledge useful. That's not about freedom of thought or about intellectualism. I simply don't respect that characteristic in anybody.

And furthermore, it's incredibly naive to suggest such areas of study do not contribute meaning in society or have no place as of a career choice.

Those women in Saudi Arabia are brave, which you know nothing about first hand, so don't try to throw it in my face. My grandmother went through similar things and lived in genocidal war zone where rape was used as a form of punishment and terrorism to control women. I know my heroes in this discussion, and I have worked with women who have been trafficked and forced into third world prostitution rings, beaten and raped. What the **** have you done for women, or for any woman that has risked more than you ever have for freedom? I am willing to bet nothing.

This discussion is not about you putting women into different categories and telling us we aren't ****. This conversation is about your ignorant attitude that studying women's progress is wrong and taboo. Obviously, you should study it, because you might find out, that in America, before women could vote, own property, or work, they quoted the founding fathers. They didn't go back and try to find feminists from dark corners of history. Women's freedom is about ****ing freedom and nothing else. If a woman in Saudi Arabia can't quote the Saudi Royal Family, but she finds inspiration in quotes from American feminists, then good for her. It isn't about women versus men. It's about freedom. A woman's voice is just as strong in that struggle.

Learning is not an absolute. there are right ways to learn things and wrong ways to learn thing. Not all learning process is correct or leads you to be a better person and can cause you to develop some serious complexes and sometimes, create a warped image of the world. Learning about history, in the correct form, is not a fun activity. It's depressing and it's hard. But once you pass through that... what you end up with is happyness. The joy of understanding.

There was this very amazing image that describes exactly what I was talking about but I just can't find it. There are a few people. The first one is standing and looking at a wall that is full of pretty flowers (ignorance is bliss). The next one is on top of a few books and he sees above the wall and it's a dirty dark world-> people who are not ignorant but know just enough to see the bad in the world and have a warped image of it. The next guy is sitting on more books and he sees beyond that at the green pastures and beauty and stuff -> you learn more, you dont' see the bad, but the good too. And then the final guy is sitting on even more books and he's above the clouds and what he sees is a beautiful, marvelous sky image... and that is the guy whose knowledge makes him see the full picture and the possibilities for the future that said knowledge brings to him.

If you want to learn about religion... learn about more than 1 religion and it's stages of development. It gives you perspective. This is the right way to learn if you want to be an intellectual. Otherwise... you're just satisfying your own religious or anti-religious needs. it's like how people like Bill Maher are. They don't know jack about most other religions, just about Christianity, and they use that knowledge to bash on it to get a following. Or... how people like... wahts' her name, stupid from Alaska... that tries and mix religion with politics and claims that god spoke to her.

I don't want to control what people learn. it's not my ambition. I'm just saying, if you want to learn something, learn it properly. Don't do it half-assed and if you can't or won't, then be ready to be branded ignorant when that term is called for. It's not a matter of satisfying my own criteria, it's about increasing the level of understanding of people so that you don't engage in meaningless debates with people who think they know something when in fact, they know nothing.

I'm not against womens' freedom and liberties. Quote me where I said that I am, I dare you, I double dare you.

Feminism is not about freedom anymore or about anything of the sorts. The problems of today cannot be solved by feminism or feminist attitudes or ideology at least not in this little neck of the woods. It's just not how it works because it doesn't work.

Are you sure that saudi women are quoting american feminists? You know, the things I saw... they were praying to Allah to give them strength to continue on what they were doing. Just saying. That world, that place... it's kind of less about americans (so much ego... really, americans aren't the center of the universe for most people) and more about religion. Like it was in the last 1400 years, Islam will either make or brake the middle east in these few years. Well... so far it's broken it... well, kinda... but who knows what the future brings.

Also, you have no idea where and what I experienced in life and furthermore, whatever you appraise your experience to doesn't in any way mean that you can assume you're more knowledgeable than I am. Or that you have a better understanding that I do. Unless, of course, you can bring something provable, palpable, to the table of discussion from a reputable source. Which you know... good luck. I wish you do so that if it's something worthwhile, I'll actually learn something in this exchange instead of just having a chit chat basically.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

There is no such thing as womens' history anymore than there is mens' history. There is history of a country or of a continent or of the world. there is art history. There is musical history. there is political history. There is literary history. There is no such thing as gender history. Generally speaking, history is history, complete, total, full. Not cut down into bite size news... that's the source of so much of peoples' ignorance in regards to history. They only get to see a narrow view of it instead of the whole picture. You don't need to know all the history, god knows it's too much... but just being good in one period of it will give you the right mentality on how to approach it in regards to everything else.

College is supposed to prepare you for life. Well, ideally, all education should... but lets not get too ambitious and just say college. A good set of skills for the marketplace. Where does feminist studies go in there? And also, feminist studies != womens' studies whatever that may be... I mean, if womens' studies mean anything aside from a biological course into female anatomy and biology... then you know, everything else is bollocks.

College needs to teach people things that are of value in life. Being a feminist is worthless and nobody will pay you to be a feminist because there is no such a job on the marketplace that generates profit. I make web apps for a living. I create something that people are willing to pay me for because that in turn will help them make more money. I generate stuff that has value. A feminist generates... what that as value. Nothing. Its' useless and therefore the only reason it exists is because there are people stupid enough to pay money for a college degree in that... just like people are willing to pay money to go to college to get a degree in liberal arts or to sit around and analyze poems of someone dead for 400 years. Yes, the Dead Poets Society was a fantastic movie but those were pre-university prep school and Red Forman had the right idea for his son to become a profession that is actually worthwhile. Poetry was a relaxation thing, not a thing that you can make a living out off. I hope I got my point across.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but your assessment of the fields of history is dead wrong. There are numerous subfields of history, including women's and gender history. I, for one, research intellectual and disability history. Colleagues of mine study gender history, and it's a fantastic realm. Just because you don't get that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Just because you haven't read the phenomenal work being done by historians doesn't mean you can somehow think it is worthless. It's not. The only thing you need to do is pick up the books and read. Joan Wallach Scott would be a good place to start, but I suppose the challenge may be too much to bear.

Generally speaking, history is history, complete, total, full. Not cut down into bite size news... that's the source of so much of peoples' ignorance in regards to history. They only get to see a narrow view of it instead of the whole picture.

Platitudes of the ignorant. We take chunks of it because it helps inform the whole. Furthermore, if you know what you were talking about, you would probably realize "doing the whole" makes assumptions about what that "whole" is, and somehow presupposes one could adequately summarize history through one go at it.
 
Last edited:
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12:85]

... It should matter to you buddy boy.

I am not a boy. Pay attention to the info below a member's username.


Student loans are easy to give and therefore a lot of students go and learn things like that... then you wonder why the student debt problem is a real deal.
If you were to say "ok, students can declare bankruptcy and not have to pay their student loans if they can't find a job because of what they learn in college" and not have them guarateed by the state as they are now, no bank will give loans to student who want to study feminism or womens' study or bible studies or some crap like that. No sir.

Are people who take these courses more likely to declare bankruptcy than any other student? If you say yes, please provide proof.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

Yes, I agree. But the girl who chased after her sign is only 16, and the other protestors are also young people. The so-called "grownup"...the representative of her university...wasn't.

If they are too young to know better, which is what it seems you are saying, then perhaps they shouldn't have been taking part in a "grownup" activity.
 
Re: Fem. Studies Prof Accused of Assaulting Teen Prolife Demonstrator[W:12]

If you are referring to me saying 'theft is theft', I have said they should have called the cops and waited for them. As for trespass, we don't know if those areas allow public access or not. Until we do, I am not commenting either way on that particular issue.

NO, I wasn't referring to you specifically.

As far as trespass, I wasn't sure at first, but then I found a link to the university's policies (which I posted earlier in the thread) which said that visitors were not allowed to do that.
 
Back
Top Bottom