Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Political forums > Environment & Climate Issues



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-09, 12:26 PM   #11
Guru
 
ptif219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 08:48 PM
Location: melbourne florida
Posts: 2,686
Thanks: 177
Thanked 261 Times in 218 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

What it shows is their is no crisis and climate change is not caused by man
__________________
Me and my seven and half month old mastiff puppy
ptif219 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 01:30 PM   #12
Guru

 
Gill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: 03-16-10 03:48 PM
Location: The Derby City
Posts: 4,380
Thanks: 439
Thanked 742 Times in 513 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Talk View Post
Except the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased, we know that from observations Mauna Loa as well as other sites. Dr. Knorr is not saying that there hasn't been an increase in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, what he is saying is that there has been no change in the fraction that is being absorbed vs. airborne. For example:

1850: 1,000 tons of CO2, 40% is airborne, 400 tons of airborne CO2

Today: 1,000,000 tons of CO2, 40% is airborne, 400,000 tons of airborne CO2

*The numbers aren't correct but they're just used to demonstrate the point

The amount of CO2 to in the atmosphere dramatically increased but the fraction that was airborne stayed the same hence why the the article says:
What he is saying is that the amount of CO2 being absorbed by the ecosystems on Earth has not changed. The oceans and terrestrial system are absorbing the same percentage as they were 150 years ago. One of the main tenets of AGW is that these bodies have or will meet a saturation point where they won't absorb any more, thus causing a runaway amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. That is not happening.
__________________
There is so much unforced variability in the system which we can’t predict — the chaotic component of the climate system — which is not predictable beyond two weeks, even theoretically.
Gavin Schmidt, NASA GISS
Gill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 02:15 PM   #13
Gnome Chomsky

 
Joe1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Last Seen: Today 04:04 PM
Location: TX
Posts: 1,790
Thanks: 1,804
Thanked 817 Times in 447 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassandra View Post

"But Dr Wolfgang Knorr cautioned that the world should still be trying to reduce carbon dioxide emissions as part of any climate change deal decided in Copenhagen next month.

He pointed out that the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is still increasing, even though half is absorbed by the Earth. Also there are fears that the oceans and soil become saturated and are unable to absorb any more CO2 in the future."
Thanks for posting the important part of the article.
Joe1991 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 02:28 PM   #14
Student
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Seen: 03-10-10 05:24 PM
Location: New York
Posts: 280
Thanks: 28
Thanked 100 Times in 75 Posts
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
What he is saying is that the amount of CO2 being absorbed by the ecosystems on Earth has not changed. The oceans and terrestrial system are absorbing the same percentage as they were 150 years ago. One of the main tenets of AGW is that these bodies have or will meet a saturation point where they won't absorb any more, thus causing a runaway amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. That is not happening.
So we agree.
Frank Talk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 02:36 PM   #15
Guru

 
Gill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: 03-16-10 03:48 PM
Location: The Derby City
Posts: 4,380
Thanks: 439
Thanked 742 Times in 513 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Talk View Post
So we agree.
Great, good to hear that you are skeptical of the global warming theory.
__________________
There is so much unforced variability in the system which we can’t predict — the chaotic component of the climate system — which is not predictable beyond two weeks, even theoretically.
Gavin Schmidt, NASA GISS
Gill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 03:36 PM   #16
Educator
 
Cassandra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 09:16 AM
Location: Maine
Posts: 726
Thanks: 103
Thanked 126 Times in 100 Posts
Lean: Independent
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
What he is saying is that the amount of CO2 being absorbed by the ecosystems on Earth has not changed. The oceans and terrestrial system are absorbing the same percentage as they were 150 years ago. One of the main tenets of AGW is that these bodies have or will meet a saturation point where they won't absorb any more, thus causing a runaway amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. That is not happening.
You mean it has not happened yet, but may- as the scientist, himself, notes
Cassandra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 05:01 PM   #17
Sage

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:05 PM
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,284
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,976 Times in 1,384 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
Not misleading at all... it clearly states that airborne CO2 has not increased since 1850. Does the title state as you claim "no increase in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere?" No it doesn't does it??

The percentage of airborne CO2 is NOT increasing as every climate paper is claiming if this paper is correct. Any person not saturated in alarmist Kool-Aid would absolutely believe this paper turns the climate world on it's ear.
Yeah, I find the claim that it hasn't increased to be a bit odd.
__________________
Treat your Congressman like your underwear. Change often.
Scarecrow Akhbar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 05:15 PM   #18
Guru
 
ptif219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 08:48 PM
Location: melbourne florida
Posts: 2,686
Thanks: 177
Thanked 261 Times in 218 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe1991 View Post
Thanks for posting the important part of the article.
Don't look now but Obama is working to scale back the actions taken at Copenhagen.
__________________
Me and my seven and half month old mastiff puppy
ptif219 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 05:27 PM   #19
Sage

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Seen: Today 02:05 PM
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,284
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,976 Times in 1,384 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
Don't look now but Obama is working to scale back the actions taken at Copenhagen.
Is he mad at them for not giving his buds the Olympics?
__________________
Treat your Congressman like your underwear. Change often.
Scarecrow Akhbar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-09, 06:17 PM   #20
Guru
 
ptif219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Last Seen: Yesterday 08:48 PM
Location: melbourne florida
Posts: 2,686
Thanks: 177
Thanked 261 Times in 218 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: New Study – No increase in airborne CO2 since 1850

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarecrow Akhbar View Post
Is he mad at them for not giving his buds the Olympics?
No he is trying to find ways to stop spending.


Copenhagen climate talks: No deal, we're out of time, Obama warns | Environment | The Guardian
__________________
Me and my seven and half month old mastiff puppy
ptif219 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts