Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Political forums > Environment & Climate Issues



Reply
 
LinkBack (7) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-15-08, 04:41 PM   #11
Sage

 
jfuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: 01-06-10 06:42 PM
Location: Pacific Rim
Posts: 16,586
Thanks: 3,668
Thanked 1,226 Times in 924 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Asshat of the year:  Congratulations on winning the DP Asshat of the Year Award for 2008. True Debate Winner:  Winner of True Debate #6 
Total Awards: 2

Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
Let me know when you are able to prove it has gotten warmer in the past 5 years. You certainly haven't come close yet.
In contrast to 20 years ago? You bet.
jfuh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-08, 04:44 PM   #12
Sage

 
jfuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: 01-06-10 06:42 PM
Location: Pacific Rim
Posts: 16,586
Thanks: 3,668
Thanked 1,226 Times in 924 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Asshat of the year:  Congratulations on winning the DP Asshat of the Year Award for 2008. True Debate Winner:  Winner of True Debate #6 
Total Awards: 2

Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
Here's a temperature graph for you to comment on:

Yep, looks like they're rising to me. I have more if you have trouble understanding this one.
Why can you not honestly post the temps of the last hundred years gill? Want to gamble what next year will be like?
If next year is hotter than this year does will you admit that you've been wrong? No you're more than likly going to be saying well one year doesn't counter 5 years.
Same thing here, 5 years of minor insignificant cooler temps does not in any way invalidate over a hundred years of warming.
jfuh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 06:53 AM   #13
Guru

 
Gill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 05:30 AM
Location: The Derby City
Posts: 4,382
Thanks: 440
Thanked 745 Times in 514 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfuh View Post
Why can you not honestly post the temps of the last hundred years gill?
ummm, could it be that I was discussing the last 5 years and not the last hundred years??

Quote:
Want to gamble what next year will be like?
sure

Quote:
If next year is hotter than this year does will you admit that you've been wrong?
if next year is cooler, will you admit you've been wrong??

Quote:
No you're more than likly going to be saying well one year doesn't counter 5 years. Same thing here, 5 years of minor insignificant cooler temps does not in any way invalidate over a hundred years of warming.
Gavin Schmidt at realclimate has already admitted that 13 years of cooling will be significant and cast doubt on AGW theory. Do you agree with him??
__________________
There is so much unforced variability in the system which we can’t predict — the chaotic component of the climate system — which is not predictable beyond two weeks, even theoretically.
Gavin Schmidt, NASA GISS

Last edited by Gill; 10-16-08 at 06:58 AM.
Gill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 06:57 AM   #14
Guru

 
Gill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 05:30 AM
Location: The Derby City
Posts: 4,382
Thanks: 440
Thanked 745 Times in 514 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heretic View Post
'Course, I'm sure they're being forced to say that, lest Al Gore eat their children.
Maybe I'm having trouble reading this, but where exactly does the Hadley Centre state in your quote that the trend of the last five years is not cooling??

OR, maybe you'd be so kind as to show us all which data points on the graph I posted are incorrect.

Does Algore eat meat??
__________________
There is so much unforced variability in the system which we can’t predict — the chaotic component of the climate system — which is not predictable beyond two weeks, even theoretically.
Gavin Schmidt, NASA GISS
Gill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 08:25 AM   #15
Godmotherbeaver of the MM
Dungeon Master


Asteroids Champion, Pacman Champion, Ms Pacman Champion
 
Middleground's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 05:36 PM
Location: Canada's Capital
Posts: 7,166
Thanks: 4,005
Thanked 2,076 Times in 1,276 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Female

Dungeon Master:  Thank you. 
Total Awards: 1

Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
Maybe I'm having trouble reading this, but where exactly does the Hadley Centre state in your quote that the trend of the last five years is not cooling??

OR, maybe you'd be so kind as to show us all which data points on the graph I posted are incorrect.

Does Algore eat meat??
Why do you refer to Al Gore as Algore? I've seen it before, and I don't understand. Is it a Freeper/talking points thing?
__________________
Guess what I don't care and don't believe dogs gas causes global warming. After all it is 40 degrees here in Florida today. --ptif219
Middleground is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 08:29 AM   #16
Guru

 
Gill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 05:30 AM
Location: The Derby City
Posts: 4,382
Thanks: 440
Thanked 745 Times in 514 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
Why do you refer to Al Gore as Algore? I've seen it before, and I don't understand. Is it a Freeper/talking points thing?
No, it's simply a takeoff on Marty Feldman's character in Young Frankenstein.

His name was Igor, which he pronounced 'eye' gore. Al Gore's eyes start bugging out like Feldman's when he gets crazy talking about AGW.
__________________
There is so much unforced variability in the system which we can’t predict — the chaotic component of the climate system — which is not predictable beyond two weeks, even theoretically.
Gavin Schmidt, NASA GISS
Gill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 03:47 PM   #17
Sage

 
jfuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: 01-06-10 06:42 PM
Location: Pacific Rim
Posts: 16,586
Thanks: 3,668
Thanked 1,226 Times in 924 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Asshat of the year:  Congratulations on winning the DP Asshat of the Year Award for 2008. True Debate Winner:  Winner of True Debate #6 
Total Awards: 2

Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
ummm, could it be that I was discussing the last 5 years and not the last hundred years??
It seems rediculous to only be mentioning the last 5 years with complete disregard to the patterns of the last hundred years and then claim that there's cooling. You wouldn't happen to still be stuck in the 70's would you?
But since you love to do this sort of thing, please by all means show me what the 5 year trend in the last 50 years has been and where that trend is today in relationship to the last 50 years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill
sure
Great I wager that 2009 will be far warmer globally than 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill
if next year is cooler, will you admit you've been wrong??
No, of course not why would I do that? 6 years still does not establish a trend, now if it continues for a decade there might be something there but still does not draw away from the evidence of AGW as is. I have over a hundred years to back up mine and you don't admit to anything.
Even today you still have never been able to answer on this board in plain text what your position is exactly on AGW.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill
Gavin Schmidt at realclimate has already admitted that 13 years of cooling will be significant and cast doubt on AGW theory. Do you agree with him??
I agree it would be significant and there would be doubt cast on AGW but not because the science says so, rather the politics would say so.
However as much as you are trying to spin this into something about cooling, that's not what will happen next year. Next year will be undoubtedly be warmer than this year because there is no La Nina next year.
jfuh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 03:54 PM   #18
Guru

 
Gill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 05:30 AM
Location: The Derby City
Posts: 4,382
Thanks: 440
Thanked 745 Times in 514 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfuh View Post
It seems rediculous to only be mentioning the last 5 years with complete disregard to the patterns of the last hundred years and then claim that there's cooling. You wouldn't happen to still be stuck in the 70's would you?
But since you love to do this sort of thing, please by all means show me what the 5 year trend in the last 50 years has been and where that trend is today in relationship to the last 50 years.
Once again, I'm only saying that the last five years have trended cooler, nothing more, nothing less.

Quote:
Great I wager that 2009 will be far warmer globally than 2008
Great, I'll be waiting on an admission from you in 14 months.

Quote:
No, of course not why would I do that? 6 years still does not establish a trend, now if it continues for a decade there might be something there but still does not draw away from the evidence of AGW as is. I have over a hundred years to back up mine and you don't admit to anything.
Even today you still have never been able to answer on this board in plain text what your position is exactly on AGW.
Then I guess I won't agree that any warming will continue indefinitely if it turns out warmer next year.

I've stated my position on GW several times.

Quote:
I agree it would be significant and there would be doubt cast on AGW but not because the science says so, rather the politics would say so.
However as much as you are trying to spin this into something about cooling, that's not what will happen next year. Next year will be undoubtedly be warmer than this year because there is no La Nina next year.
We shall see.
__________________
There is so much unforced variability in the system which we can’t predict — the chaotic component of the climate system — which is not predictable beyond two weeks, even theoretically.
Gavin Schmidt, NASA GISS
Gill is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 04:17 PM   #19
Sage

 
jfuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Seen: 01-06-10 06:42 PM
Location: Pacific Rim
Posts: 16,586
Thanks: 3,668
Thanked 1,226 Times in 924 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Asshat of the year:  Congratulations on winning the DP Asshat of the Year Award for 2008. True Debate Winner:  Winner of True Debate #6 
Total Awards: 2

Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
Once again, I'm only saying that the last five years have trended cooler, nothing more, nothing less.



Great, I'll be waiting on an admission from you in 14 months.



Then I guess I won't agree that any warming will continue indefinitely if it turns out warmer next year.

I've stated my position on GW several times.
Actually no you never have. But if you have, why not state it here for the record just one more time.

Quote:
We shall see.
You're already giving yourself an exit strategy in the red statement above. You're still not going to admit anything ever - but at least that is the honesty.
You're so wrapped up in your conspiracy theory that you believe it to be the only truth and reject the science.
You have 5 years of minor insignificant cooler temperatures that are a result of severely decreased sun spot activity (11 year cycle) and a La Nina year this year - wow what a surprise it got cooler this year. And because of this to be expected cooling you're jumping the gun and claiming despite the 100+ years of warming it's all crap because these last 5 years have been cooler than 2002.
What you fail to recognize is it's still warmer than the baseline before the Industrial revolution despite solar and oceanic activities.
jfuh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-08, 11:54 PM   #20
Student
 
Heretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Last Seen: 07-08-09 01:45 PM
Posts: 224
Thanks: 16
Thanked 73 Times in 46 Posts
Re: Anthropogenic Global Warming 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gill View Post
Maybe I'm having trouble reading this, but where exactly does the Hadley Centre state in your quote that the trend of the last five years is not cooling??
They didn't say global temps haven't fallen. But be serious. You didn't mean "we're cooling" as in "we're in a period of low solar activity and a La Nina", but in "AGW is a scam and Al Gore is a poopie head".

Sorry, but the scientists working for our government still disagree with you. They made that clear in the first two sentences:
Quote:
The recent fall in global temperatures has led to increasing speculation that global warming is a thing of the past.

Despite this fall, a look at global average temperatures reveals a different picture. It shows large variability in our climate year-on-year – warmer some years, cooler in others - but what is very clear is an underlying rise over the longer term, almost certainly caused by man-made emissions of greenhouse gases.
'Course, I'm sure they're being forced to say that, lest Al Gore eat their children and Dubya stop funding them.
__________________
The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function. -- Dr. Albert Bartlett

Last edited by Heretic; 10-16-08 at 11:55 PM.
Heretic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/Environment/37809-anthropogenic-global-warming-101-a.html
Posted By For Type Date
The Marriage Bed :: View topic - Two Children Should Be The Limit Says Environmentalist This thread Refback 03-25-09 07:55 PM
Global Warming - Page 18 - Catholic Answers Forums This thread Refback 02-09-09 10:49 AM
RealClimate This thread Refback 01-23-09 12:16 AM
arizona proposition 101 | findmortgagerefinancing This thread Refback 12-06-08 01:07 PM
RealClimate This thread Refback 10-27-08 03:21 AM
global warming research papers | Packaging & Paper - Packaging Products, Paper, Paper Exporters and more This thread Pingback 10-19-08 11:06 AM
Global Warming Clearinghouse This thread Refback 10-14-08 03:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts