Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanda  What evidence do you have that Jena 6 family members are untrustworthy sources? They are undoubtedly biased sources, but so is yours. |
Okay. Its obvious that the Jena 6 family members,
The Final Call founded by Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, and Friends for Justice BLOGS are biased sources. Can you intelligently explain to me how the Jena Times is a biased source? Can you explain to me how the Christian Science Monitor is a biased source?
Quote:
|
The article is biased to the point of dishonesty.
|
Proof?
Quote:
For instance, the article states:
"There has never been a “whites-only” tree at Jena High School. Students of all races sat underneath this tree."
This is misleading. On rare occasions, students of either race may have crossed the demarcation sidewalk, but the tree was traditionally a white students' gathering spot as admitted by the students.
|
Proof? Your just gonna say this stuff you got off of a blog? Were you a student at Jena High during this time?
Quote:
|
"(The nooses) were understood to be a prank by three white students aimed at their fellow white friends, members of the school rodeo team. (The students apparently got the idea from watching episodes of “Lonesome Dove.”)
|
Quote:
This version has been abandoned in favor of yet another excuse: The nooses were hung in anticipation of the upcoming game with the "Mustangs." So, two versions, and neither of them explain why, if the nooses were only an innocent prank, did the principal originally recommend expulsion?
|
1. So your telling me now that you KNOW what the nooses were understood BY PARTICULAR STUDENTS. I'd like to know where you get your brain wave reading machine, I'd like to get one of those.
2. Where did you get your ancitipation of a game with the Mustangs story?
You do realize its hard for me to believe you because you have thrown out so many "theories" in this thread its sad right?
Quote:
There are many other examples, but the most flagrant one, IMO, is this:
"When District Attorney Reed Walters spoke to Jena High students at an assembly in September, he did not tell black students that he could make their life miserable with 'the stroke of a pen.' ”
Alan Bean explains:
"No one has ever suggested that Reed Walters threatened to make the lives of students “miserable”–he said he could make their lives disappear (a slight difference in tone, you’ll agree). Also, we must remember that school assemblies in Jena have traditionally been segregated. That’s the way it was when the high school integrated in 1970; and that’s the way it has remained. Black students insist he was looking at the black side of the auditorium when he issued his threat; but I don’t think it matters where he was looking.
We are being asked to believe that an irate Reed Walters told chatty white girls that he would use the power of his office to destroy their lives if they didn’t shut up. This is nonsense; but even if it’s true, is that the kind of prosecutor you want in the LaSalle Parish courthouse?' |
So, its a flagrant exaggeration because Alan Bean (biased blogger man for a liberal organization with just THIS type of agenda) has suggested that you "imagine" that the DA was talking to the Blacks, with no other reason? This is horse****.
WoW! Another blog!