And the only person who could account for THIS story was, Robert Bailey Jr.
My sources says this,
WoW.... A Drastically different story from your own now isn't it?
Okay. And what my source says about this incident.......
Imagine that.... My source has researched this story for myths as well.
Wow... Imagine that.
[url="http://uspolitics.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article%3FAID=/20070920/NEWS01/709200330"]Interesting...
Note that your source article was written a full two months prior to mine. This might be an indication that your source is when the story originally broke, and the information obtained by the source was obtained through untrustworthy sources (Like the family members of the Jena 6).
My source was published less than a month ago, after the story broke big and there were so many conflicting statements as to what really happened. They got in and discovered that there were several myths reported by the mainstream media, probably to get the story more hype and thus more viewership or newspaper sales. However, the Christian Science Monitor got their information the the local Jena news reporters and police, you know, the people who have been dealing with this incident from the beginning of this unconnected chain of events.
And Viola, here it is...
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1024/p...op.html?page=1