Quote:
Originally Posted by RightinNYC  This is not what you initially argued. I pointed these things out just to highlight the differences between what you were arguing and what the truth was.
Your argument was that the 16th Amendment is illegal. It is not. You continue to claim it is. I'm asking you for some (any) evidence to support this from a reputable source.
Ron Paul's a dip****. |
I argued article 1 section 8 has nothing to do with our current tax system. I proved it, and than you go off and prove it for me.
Jeff and I have a little ball busting contest, which in reality just makes it more fun on here sometimes. He's a big boy, and doesnt need you to come in and attempt to save grace.
The income taxes during the civil war were based on appropriation and enumeration, were they not??? Which means they follow section 8. Last time i checked, the civil war tax has not 1 thing to do with the tax codes of today, as the OP specifically asked. Which goes to show, you were just trying to call me out, and now look silly in doing so.
Your entire point proves mine even further. When i said taxes pre 1913 were based on appropriation and enumeration why is it you said
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldenboy219 View Post
Unfortunately, all taxes on the individual were taxes based on appropriation and enumeration.
Again, this is incorrect.
|
???????????????????????????
Which goes to show why they made the 16th amendment (my point in regards to Jeff and the OP), meaning your dead wrong.
Unless you dare to have a debate on the constitution????