Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffMerriman  Wow, RightInNYC just pimped your hillbilly ass all over this thread. Let me ask you this, what does being a police officer have to do with knowing the tax code and the the interpretation of constitutional authority to lay taxes? |
pimped my hillbilly a$$??? Another Merriman opinion. The 16th amendment is what granted the federal government to tax the income as we do today.
The civil war taxes were in the form of (denied by RNYC) appropriation and enumeration (i stated it and it was deemed incorrect).
Quote:
|
I didn't even try to delve into this. I only addressed the idea of uniformity in taxation. I never ever addressed whether or not our current tax system was in line with the intent of our forefathers or whether or not a particular section of the amendments gave any particular authority.
|
Than why reply that section 1 article 8 has any uniformity in regards to the income tax??? It doesnt, unless you were talking about enumeration and appropriation???
Quote:
|
You are so desperate to "show everyone you own me" or something that you will come out here and parade around like some kind of jackass. "Look at me! I owned JeffMerriman! Look how stupid he is!" But look at what you post. You took what I posted and extrapolated to the point that your moronic rambling prompted someone else to jump all over your ass. I'll be the first to admit, I don't really understand the controversy between the intent of the constitution and the way the government has determined it's authority to lay taxes the way they do. And judging from you post, you really don't either. Luckily I didn't put my junk out on the chopping block to get it hammered like you did. Then again your idea of getting dressed up for a date is to wear you clean wife beater and run a comb through your mullet.
|
Does every response have to be part conception??? I was just bustin your balls a little bit about this particular subject.
What part of my post would give you the reason to believe im making things up???
Ill tell you what. You can talk all the $hit you want. You can ride everyones jock anytime they have even a minor disagreement with me. Than after words, talk your smack.
I will just call things how i see them, and do my best to be unbiased towards the subject matter as much as possible. Ill also bust your balls every time you express your intellect.
Sound ok to you???
Quote:
|
I'm sorry you are not as cool as you would like to be. But listen, this is the internet, and it's not really all that important. If I were you maybe I would spend less time getting my head punched in and more time working on developing at least a mildly decent personality.
|
If i was "trying to be as cool as i wanted", i most definitely wouldnt be here trying to achieve that goal. BTW, the gloves are not until late April, so im a full time student until then.
Back to the point at hand Jeff.
Quote:
|
Do you think current federal taxation code complies with this article of the constitution?
|
If you didnt know the answer, why post???
Answer: no, its the 16th amendment. As shown by RNYC, all other income based taxes were based off of appropriation and enumeration...