nes
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
- Messages
- 382
- Reaction score
- 6
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
RCRC - FAQs
"Anti-choice groups have used the issue of late-term abortion as fodder in their propaganda war against women.
Statement based off assumptions. Whats the point of the sentence?
They claim that late-term abortion is a common practice.
Of course not, but claim that late-term abortion is usually unnecessary.
In fact, late-term abortions are extremely rare. Ninety-one percent of all abortions are in the first 12 weeks.
0.001% is extremely rare, not 9%.
It is ludicrous to suggest that women would carry healthy pregnancies for seven or eight months and then have an abortion on a whim.
Its not ludicrous,
For what reasons are late-term abortions usually perfomed?
Only two percent (2%) said "a fetal problem was diagnosed late in pregnancy," compared to 71% who responded "did not recognize that she was pregnant or misjudged gestation," 48% who said "found it hard to make arrangements," and 33% who said "was afraid to tell her partner or parents." The report did not indicate that any of the 420 late abortions were performed because of maternal health problems.
And I'm quoting from fact, not from opinions stemming from ignorance from a website.
Yet this is the anti-choice argument! On the rare occasions when women have third-trimester abortions, they do so because their fetuses have severe or fatal anomalies or because the pregnancy endangers their lives or health. "
No, thats your / website's opinion of what they think is the anti-choice argument. I've just stated fact above showing that
http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/pbafact9.html said:The report did not indicate that any of the 420 late abortions were performed because of maternal health problems.
Everyone is entitled to strive for a better life.
Everyone except a child in the womb?
Everyone who has children wants to provide a good life for them, and doing so sometimes means postponing childbearing until later.
If EVERYONE who has children wants to provide a good life for them, then why do people sexually molest or abuse their own children? Seem as if your statement has absolutely no merit.
Circumstances are different for everyone, only the individual involved can judge.
No, its all about what the liberals in court do.
What does this have to do with late-term abortion? You seem resentful that people have sex for YEARS.
No I don't, I'm just acknowledging that I know people have sex for years and don't want children.
Late-term abortions are illegal in most states except for medical reasons.
I wonder why.
I don't believe that men pay child support for a fetus. They have no responsibility before a child is born, therefore they have no decision-making rights.
Are you unable to distinguish on why the child suddenly automatically becomes half the fathers after its born? Why is that if it supposedly was part of the woman.
Adoption is more emotionally traumatic than abortion.
Thats your opinion, In fact children adopted to be statistically shown to have better lives with their parents.
New Study Finds Adoptive Parents More Invested in Their Children than Biological Parents
13,000 households with first-graders in the family showed that adoptive parents spend more time reading to their children, eating together, and talking with them about their problems.
Pregnancy/childbirth is more dangerous physically than abortion.
Again your opinion that has no common sense backing it.
What women could or should do is a decision best made by them, not a self-righteous stranger.
That statement makes no sense and is based off your opinion. So if woman want to commit crimes such as stealing and killing does that mean that is what they should do?
Last edited: