• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

This Election Was Stolen

Caine said:
Just like the Aquapub I knew and hated.
I DEMANDED for you to show PROOF of what you claim to be fact.
You didn't because its all wild *** paranoia conspiracy theory moron assumptions.

This is why I put you on ignore in the first place, "debating" with you is like getting into a bitch fest with a woman on PMS.
Click to expand...


Utterly moronic. :roll:

Just because liberals don't go out of their way to say things in the most self-damaging way doesn't mean they aren't advocating handing Iraq over to terrorists.

1) They constantly tell us the terrorists are winning,

2) They have said repeatedly (until 2 weeks before the election) that they want an urgent withdraw from Iraq.

It's not rocket science, genius. Like I said, liberals had to pretend to be conservatives and fight tooth and nail to get a razor thin majority under the easiest conditions imagineable.

When they suddenly stopped advocating "redeploying" from this country they insisted is falling to terrorists, they stopped asserting what they stand for, which IS handing Iraq over to terrorists.

Remove head from rectum, THEN debate. :lol:
 
Ivan The Terrible said:
Aquapub,

Reading your posts brings joy to my heart. It gives me hope for America.
Click to expand...

Why thank you. Debating with semi-literate hysterics like Caine is like putting your hand on your little brother's forehead while he swings wildly at you. At least it's amusing. :mrgreen:
 
aquapub said:
Why thank you. Debating with semi-literate hysterics like Caine is like putting your hand on your little brother's forehead while he swings wildly at you. At least it's amusing. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

Except that you don't debate. You just spew blind partisan hatred.
 
jallman said:
Except that you don't debate. You just spew blind partisan hatred.
Click to expand...

:rofl

You did NOT just say that.

:rofl
 
Perfect example of why I keep saying liberals have no place in serious, adult conversations...

My point: Among many other things, in order to scrape out a razor thin majority, liberals had to act like conservatives by suddenly no longer advocating that we immediately hand Iraq over to terrorists, raise taxes, and set Al Queda operatives, pedophiles free.

Caine's devastating counterpoint: Unless you can provide a quote from a liberal stating that they want to hand over Iraq to terrorists-in those exact words-then the left's repeated calls for an urgent and immediate "redeployment" from the enemy (known as TERRORISTS), isn't a call to hand Iraq over to terrorists and aquapub is a liar and horrible person. :notlook:


Please, those of us who aren't missing a chromosome are trying to have a conversation. :roll:
 
aquapub said:
Perfect example of why I keep saying liberals have no place in serious, adult conversations...

My point: Among many other things, in order to scrape out a razor thin majority, liberals had to act like conservatives by suddenly no longer advocating that we immediately hand Iraq over to terrorists, raise taxes, and set Al Queda operatives, pedophiles free.

Caine's devastating counterpoint: Unless you can provide a quote from a liberal stating that they want to hand over Iraq to terrorists-in those exact words-then the left's repeated calls for an urgent and immediate "redeployment" from the enemy (known as TERRORISTS), isn't a call to hand Iraq over to terrorists and aquapub is a liar and horrible person. :notlook:


Please, those of us who aren't missing a chromosome are trying to have a conversation. :roll:
Click to expand...

First you use hyperbole to try to villainize the opposition. your "pedophile party" rants are a perfect example. No one is supporting pedophiles that I can see. And the opposition to Jessica's law is not an attempt to let child rapists off as you claim...its an opposition to setting a limit on the punishment...I think it is set at 25years in that law. So you are, in fact, a liar.

I am not sure what kind of monkeys you are used to preaching your ignorant bullshit to, but you are obviously more impressed by your ability to intellectually intimidate others than is appropriate. Take your missing chromosome comment and shove it up your arse. Maybe with it full your mouth might have an opportunity to speak.

And, oh bright one, retardation comes from having an extra chromosome, not a missing one. Even your pitiful insults are full of shyte.
 
Girls, girls....You're both pretty!

Back to the topic: Why aren't the democrats cries of stolen election, voting irregularities and voter suppression from just two weeks ago being followed up on? If they had these concerns before the election, why have they let it drop? Hmmm?
 
MrMichiganDem said:
CURRENT.... I respect whichever political party you belong too. However I am not dumb or stupid, and while I was attending college I was the best in reading comprehensive. I will always believe that BUSH & Party stole Florida and Ohio, due to the way that BOTH states went down as being Republician states, and again you have your viewpoint and I have mine.
Click to expand...

Too bad yours has been completely disproven. The left's hysterical conspiracy theory drivel about those elections made them look dumb enough at the time, but to still be regurgitating such lame hysteria this long after they've been debunked takes a special kind of O.J. juror.

http://www.davekopel.org/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm#2000_Election_Night

:lol:
 
jallman said:
First you use hyperbole to try to villainize the opposition. your "pedophile party" rants are a perfect example. No one is supporting pedophiles that I can see. And the opposition to Jessica's law is not an attempt to let child rapists off as you claim...its an opposition to setting a limit on the punishment...I think it is set at 25years in that law. So you are, in fact, a liar.
Click to expand...

Of course you would call presenting facts and evidence a demonizing tactic. You're a liberal (which makes you a natural enemy of facts and evidence to begin with), and the facts show that liberals support disgusting things, like pedophilia.

Let me remind you of the many ways liberals support pedophilia:

aquapub said:
-liberals (including Nancy Pelosi) giving a standing ovation and promotion to a Democrat (Studds) who was caught screwing minors,

-liberals opposing Meagan's Law,

-liberals opposing Jessica's Law,

-liberals insisting that little boys be taken out into the woods alone with gay men (Boy Scouts),

-liberals arguing in court that a 12 year old boy has a constitutional right to have sex with grown men,

-liberals defending Barney Franks,

-liberals releasing hundreds of perverts under the far left's version of "furloughs,"

-liberals taking nearly every state to court to oppose sex offender registrations.
Click to expand...

And Jessica's Law is actually about life-long tracking of convicted pedophiles-a law which liberals (the pro-pedophile lobby) opposed. So you are, in fact, illiterate. :lol:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica's_law
 
southerndemocrat said:
The majority of Americans do not think like you do.
Click to expand...

Actually, as I have already demonstrated, they DO. That's why liberal radio always fails, why liberal TV always fails, why liberal books usually bomb, why Democrats have to act like conservatives to get elected-even when it should be effortless.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/401672-post1.html

Doing this: :notlook: doesn't get you around the facts and evidence (the left's arch rivals).
 
Conservatives base their assertions on facts and evidence, liberals base theirs on hysteria and conspiracy theories. Exhibit A:

hipsterdufus said:
I have little doubt that Blackwell rigged the election with Diebold's help in 2004 in Ohio.
Click to expand...

Those of us who don't consider tabloids "hard news" and who aren't semi-literate hysterics (i.e., liberals) find it suspicious that liberals were claiming the system was screwed all the way up till the moment (literally) they won.:roll:
 
aquapub said:
Conservatives base their assertions on facts and evidence, liberals base theirs on hysteria and conspiracy theories. Exhibit A:



Those of us who don't consider tabloids "hard news" and who aren't semi-literate hysterics (i.e., liberals) find it suspicious that liberals were claiming the system was screwed all the way up till the moment (literally) they won.:roll:
Click to expand...

I think the system was messed up on Nov 7 2006 whether the Dems won or not.

18,000 missing votes in Florida tells me so.
 
aquapub said:
Of course you would call presenting facts and evidence a demonizing tactic. You're a liberal (which makes you a natural enemy of facts and evidence to begin with), and the facts show that liberals support disgusting things, like pedophilia.

Let me remind you of the many ways liberals support pedophilia:



And Jessica's Law is actually about life-long tracking of convicted pedophiles-a law which liberals (the pro-pedophile lobby) opposed. So you are, in fact, illiterate. :lol:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica's_law
Click to expand...

Okay, so I got Jessica and Megans law's mixed up. Honest mistake. In any event, just because you say it and quote yourself (something you have quite a habit of doing while spewing your hateful partisan hackmanship) doesn't make it anymore so. And no, I am not a liberal. I am actually a moderate conservative. But then, I wouldn't expect you to recognize that through your partisan blinders.

So you are, in fact, still full of shi'ite.
 
jallman said:
Okay, so I got Jessica and Megans law's mixed up. Honest mistake.
Click to expand...


Nope. By the same juvenile basis you judge others by, this makes you a liar. There is no middle ground, no room for mistakes according to you:

jallman said:
And the opposition to Jessica's law is not an attempt to let child rapists off as you claim...its an opposition to setting a limit on the punishment...I think it is set at 25years in that law. So you are, in fact, a liar.
Click to expand...

How's that foot tasting? Mwahaha. :lol:
 
jallman said:
just because you say it and quote yourself (something you have quite a habit of doing while spewing your hateful partisan hackmanship) doesn't make it anymore so.
Click to expand...

Again, literate one, try reading before hurling your halfwit, girly PMS at people.

The link I posted was to Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jessica's_law

Man, you are just a self-discrediting machine! :2funny:
 
jallman said:
So you are, in fact, still full of shi'ite.
Click to expand...

:rofl

Every assertion you've made here has gone down in flames (quite embarrassingly, I might add) because I'm the only one here who will spend 2 seconds to get my facts right. I'm also the only one here who has presented ANY facts or evidence.

So no, O.J. juror, all the evidence points the other direction (this is what conservatives mean when they say facts and evidence are alien to liberals).

:lol: You are hilariously inept.
 
jallman said:
Okay, so I got Jessica and Megans law's mixed up.
Click to expand...


Oh yeah, also, you're dead wrong about this too, which, by your own ignoramous way of doing things, means you are a liar. No room to call it a mistake. You are just a liar. :roll:

"Megan's Law is the term used to denote a number of state laws in the United States that require law enforcement authorities to identify what are generally called sex offenders to the public at large through various media, including in some cases the Internet."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan's_Law

I think you have foot-in-mouth disease. :lol:
 
aquapub said:
Oh yeah, also, you're dead wrong about this too, which, by your own ignoramous way of doing things, means you are a liar. No room to call it a mistake. You are just a liar. :roll:

"Megan's Law is the term used to denote a number of state laws in the United States that require law enforcement authorities to identify what are generally called sex offenders to the public at large through various media, including in some cases the Internet."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan's_Law

I think you have foot-in-mouth disease. :lol:
Click to expand...

Gee, several posts back to back just to make no point at all. You would be a riot if you didn't actually take yourself and your bullshit so seriously. I am just glad that the moderates in this country spoke out with the last election and hate filled, partisan hacks like you are on the way out. Life in the USA is good.
 
I was waiting for the wild accusations to fly on this. Where are the displays of "true American patriotism" by demanding that all victor's in the elections cheated their way there? Where is the determined focus of the partisan slaves to cling to the notion that someone somewhere placed a comma in the wrong place to give the other side the win? Where are the wild assertions that other politicians rigged counts?

I am glad the Republican Party didn't follow into this despicable tactic of bogging down the victor's progress and put an end to it. If anyone doubts that the rest of the world follows our examples then they should only look to our elections. As we played the third world "rigged election" game, others followed suit all over the world. All those third world countries that actually had a legitimate grief were trivialized, because the American Democratic Party decided to behave childishly.

After so many years and so many failed elections, the Democratic Party has gained the momentum off of the back of Republican errors and the American's wish for change. They did not achieve "victory" through some constructive plan for the future. They did not secure the American vote by showing how much better they can do. But, now they have a chance to show America that they aren't the morally feeble Party so many of us see them as. All of our enemies believe in oppression, the subjugation of women, homosexual stonings, and religious intolerations. These are things that our Left always claims to stand against in their protest marches and their stages. They now have a chance to prove that their Liberal out cry for "human rights" is more than simple slogans for the sake of appearance and more than reserved for Americans only.

We have the cultural, economic, and military power to do what is necessary in these times. But we lack the vision. Weakness never saved a human life. We need to return to the great American tradition of standing up for the underdogs and supporting free will - even when that will conflicts with our own amid our constant politicial changes. Where Republicans dealt with the immediate action following 9/11 and then moved into a great and worthy experiment for the entire Middle East, it will be up to the Liberal Democrat to prove that his words regarding human rights and equality for all have merit.
 
Last edited:
i dont think it was stolen. the people voted and now there is a change. the world isnt going to end and the government will still run. lol. i dont think that republicans should get depressed over it, just accept it. Democrats, however, should not gloat over it either. They still have to preform, and live under the same scrutiny that they placed the Republicans under.
 
jallman said:
Gee, several posts back to back just to make no point at all. You would be a riot if you didn't actually take yourself and your bullshit so seriously. I am just glad that the moderates in this country spoke out with the last election and hate filled, partisan hacks like you are on the way out. Life in the USA is good.
Click to expand...

1) I proved that your statement about Jessica's Law was wrong.

2) Then you said you meant to say Meagan's Law, and I proved that THAT law wasn't what you said it was.

3) You also mocked me for using my own statements as proof, and I proved that, if you are literate, you should be able to tell that my source was actually Wikipedia.

I realize that, to liberals, proving their points wrong repeatedly constitutes "making no point at all," but in the adult world, that's called, "you losing the debate." :lol:
 
aquapub said:
1) I proved that your statement about Jessica's Law was wrong.

2) Then you said you meant to say Meagan's Law, and I proved that THAT law wasn't what you said it was.

I realize that, to liberals, proving their points wrong repeatedly constitutes "making no point at all," but in the adult world, that's called, "you losing the debate." :lol:
Click to expand...


No, you lied and almost had me believing you. I went back and checked when I had time and I was right about Jessica's law:

Yes on 83

That's why we propose the most comprehensive sex offender punishment and control reform that will be the toughest sex offender law in the nation. Jessica’s Law will:

Ensure that all child molesters who molest children under the age of 14 are put into a prison with a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years or 25 years to life. Closes all loopholes in California’s “one-strike” laws.
Click to expand...

So you are, in fact, still a liar and still throwing around bullshit. Typical. It's all you do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom