View Single Post
Old 05-05-06, 03:45 PM   #16 (permalink)
jfuh
Sage

 
jfuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Last Online: Today 03:14 AM
Location: Pacific Rim
Posts: 15,770
Thanks: 3,469
Thanked 1,110 Times in 839 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Roflol
Re: Debate #2 discussion...ToT v Billo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Korimyr the Rat
That's merely the respectful way to refer to the person you are debating with when you don't feel like being flowery enough to say "my esteemed opponent".

I prefer the respectful forms. Used in a straight tone, they help reinforce the camarederie and esteem that skilled debaters should hold for each other; with slight changes in inflection they can be used to express anything else from mild condescension to outright contempt without demonstrating any loss of control on your part.

It's like the popular myth that there ain't no swear words in Japanese, and that the language itself just ain't equipped for rudeness. What they miss is that the formal courtesy in the grammar allows you to be just as insulting without having recourse to crude language.
I'm not referencing to the grammatical usage, my reference is to the false attack on the opponent as opposed to any valid attack on the issue, which would be much more preferable.

AS for Japanese not having swear words. You're absolutely correct. Technically there are no such traditional "swear words" that are easily blanked up by this site. There is also no way of direct confrontational words or phrases (you can't say no). But it's still the same thing and understood the same way.
Would you like something to eat? "Keikko desu" or thank you, but actually mean no thanks and is understood as such.
__________________
The facts and science of the theory of anthropogenic Global warming
Quote:
Originally Posted by independent_thinker2002 View Post
I swear McCain found the one person who, if President, has the potential to make George W. Bush look good in history's eyes.
jfuh is offline