- Joined
- Oct 20, 2014
- Messages
- 12,199
- Reaction score
- 4,082
- Location
- #TrumpWasAnInsideJob
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
It would definitely benefit the federal government.
This isn't the conspiracy forum.Isn't it at all interesting that a statist like Hillary takes note of people moving away from the state? Isn't it at all interesting that she moves forward with this understanding by acting on the young? You know, there is a reason statists like the young.
Paranoia about the NWO or Hitler or God knows what else doesn't negate it.
Why should it? Hillary is concerned with the state, with her own authority and assurity of a loyal following. She is does not care for the community.
This isn't the conspiracy forum.
so.....your wondering why exactly the state should ....
There's plenty good. This program seems like it will beneficial for all involved. Paranoia about the NWO or Hitler or God knows what else doesn't negate it.
It's an effective way to pay for college if they organize it correctly. As long as they give options of which services a person can volunteer at I don't see how it would be like a cult. Unless you view a culture that promotes community service either negatively, or as some overreach by the state.
I still fail to see how this is any way analogous to the Hitler Youth, either.
There are definitely governments that have service requirements. I do agree in the sense that it is a major operation, but it is doable. And it could be an effective trade off for schooling, which is the point I like.There's not evidence whatsoever that Hillary's government or any American government for that matter, could achieve such an objective.
This isn't the conspiracy forum.
It isn't hysterics to not fall into conspiracy mode. It is exactly the opposite.Again, your hysterics surrounding your rabid defense of Dear Leader are noted and will from henceforth be ignored.
It isn't hysterics to not fall into conspiracy mode. It is exactly the opposite.
She can spit out whatever fluff she wants. I care about the program as a mechanism for free tuition, and I do believe it could be beneficial in terms of flooding programs with volunteers.It's no conspiracy. She speaks of bringing together the country through helpful deeds by the state in an program run by an organization that governs the entire country. A country brought together for what purpose, to what end? What exactly will this country that comes together think?
She can spit out whatever fluff she wants. I care about the program as a mechanism for free tuition, and I do believe it could be beneficial in terms of flooding programs with volunteers.
And yet, the community still benefits.
Helping the homeless and responding to natural disasters, for instance, both highly benefit the community. I'm not seeing how any of this is in any way fascism.
She can spit out whatever fluff she wants. I care about the program as a mechanism for free tuition, and I do believe it could be beneficial in terms of flooding programs with volunteers.
They aren't volunteers if it is mandatory.
ITS BLATANT ****ING DEBT SLAVERY.
I don't have a problem with you viewing this as an overreach from the government. That's a perfectly reasonable stance. I call it conspiracy when you pretend like you can predict the future of these policies, and label them as Naziesque because you are then making an illogical leap. It's an article about creating a volunteer service that may aid in the current fiasco of college debt. Criticizing anybody is fine, but you are making baseless statements because of obvious bias.Yet that is exactly what you are doing, being a conspiracy-theorist.
CRITICISM OF HILLARY CLINTON'S POLICIES ARE NOT ****ING CONSPIRACY THEORIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In the article you cited it clearly states it is a volunteer program.They aren't volunteers if it is mandatory.
ITS BLATANT ****ING DEBT SLAVERY.
I don't have a problem with you viewing this as an overreach from the government. That's a perfectly reasonable stance. I call it conspiracy when you pretend like you can predict the future of these policies, and label them as Naziesque because you are then making an illogical leap. It's an article about creating a volunteer service that may aid in the current fiasco of college debt. Criticizing anybody is fine, but you are making baseless statements because of obvious bias.
In the article you cited it clearly states it is a volunteer program.
Democrats have been good at violating the thirteen amendment over the years though.
There are definitely governments that have service requirements. I do agree in the sense that it is a major operation, but it is doable. And it could be an effective trade off for schooling, which is the point I like.