• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

CNBC's Oct. 28 Republican Debate thread

Moderate Right said:
I think you misunderstood my post. I was saying that Carson and Fiorina would be good picks as VP under Rubio.
Click to expand...

Ah yes i most definitely misunderstood you. My mistake.

I think Graham or Kasich would be solid VP picks under Rubio.
 
Bush's criticism of rubio was correct though. He was elected office by the people of florida, its not a part time job. I dont care if mccain/obama/kerry did it too. Is that the standard. Not to mention his irresponsibility with his own money. Much like the liberals fell in love with smooth talking obama, republicans are doing the same with rubio. I prefer to pick a candidate with a history of success as an executive. Bush has done it as gov and business. Kasich, huckabee, jindal, trump, fiorina, all of these are better picks. Its not an ojt type job
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom