• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

5 Questions for Bernie Sanders Supporters

DA60

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
16,386
Reaction score
7,793
Location
Where I am now
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
'Question 1. Would Bernie’s tax on Wall Street speculation work?
Bernie Sanders has said that he would tax Wall Street speculation and use the funding to pay for his “free” public college tuition program. A fact check by the Associated Press reported that “Sanders’ plan would cover tuition and fees at public universities – a $70 billion annual expense with the federal government picking up two-thirds of that tab by taxing trading in the financial markets.”
“Students would still be on the hook for room and board costs that average $9,804, according to the College Board,” the AP added.
...
Question 2. Do you support an increase in payroll tax for all Americans to fund Bernie’s minimum wage and healthcare plans? Do you believe Bernie’s plans will only tax the 1%?
...
Bernie Sanders was also quizzed on his plans on a recent episode of “Real Time with Bill Maher”:
“So you’re saying we can pay for all of this without raising taxes on anybody but the 1 percent?” Maher asked.
“We may have to go down a little bit lower than that — but not much lower,” Sanders replied.
Do you trust Sanders when he says the payroll tax will be “small” and that he will only raise taxes on the 1% (or a little bit lower)?

Question 3. Do you support Bernie’s comments on Edward Snowden?
Sanders has openly spoke against the NSA’s massive surveillance programs but stands with the rest of the presidential candidates in his belief that Snowden should face some type of punishment. At the first Democratic presidential debate, Bernie was asked about his position on Edward Snowden. Sanders said he believes Snowden “played a very important role in educating the American people” — but he broke the law. “I think there should be a penalty to that,” he said. “But I think that education should be taken into consideration before the sentencing.”

Question 4. Do you support Bernie’s stance on Israel and Saudi Arabia? Both of these nations are responsible for atrocious human rights violations (here and here). Saudi Arabia is also accused of funding the 9/11 attacks. Despite this, the majority of politicians — including Bernie — continue to support these nations.
Last summer, as Israeli soldiers deliberately targeted hospitals in Operative Protective Edge, Sanders joined the rest of the U.S. Senate by unanimously voting to support Israel’s actions and supporting “the State of Israel as it defends itself against unprovoked rocket attacks from the Hamas terrorist organization.”
...
Question 5. Do you support Bernie’s plan to continue the drone program? According to documents released by a new whistleblower, during one five-month period of drone operations, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets.
Senator Bernie Sanders recently said he would continue Obama’s disastrous drone program, which has resulted in the deaths of innocent people across the Middle East. In late August, Truthdig reported that Bernie Sanders told George Stephanopoulos he would continue the program.
“I think we have to use drones very, very selectively and effectively. That has not always been the case.” Sanders said. “What you can argue is that there are times and places where drone attacks have been effective. … There are times and places where they have been absolutely countereffective and have caused more problems than they have solved. When you kill innocent people, the end result is that people in the region become anti-American who otherwise would not have been.”


5 Questions for Bernie Sanders Supporters

Thoughts?
 
Love it, I like to see the far left acting the like far right. Hammering Bernie and pretty much the only positions that he isnt all the way to the left on.
 
1. The FTT (if that's indeed what he's proposing) has always been one of the most viable and lucrative (and yet nonprohibitive to any economic activity) of any tax ever proposed. As a side benefit, it would discourage high-frequency trading, which would have some effect in stabilizing financial markets.

2. Yes. It's minimal, and the returns of his programs would provide a much-needed economic boost--increased minimum wage would divert more money to stay circulating within local economies rather than go straight up to the financial sector, increasing money velocity. Single-payer healthcare would cut out a lot of bureacracy and legal fees from the healthcare system, not to mention remove the burden of healthcare coverage from employers, drastically reducing the costs of starting a small business.

3. Yes. His comment was the most focused on both human rights and reason. The other candidates' responses were rubbish in one direction or the other.

4. I do not. His pro-Israel stance is the worst of his positions for me. It should be mentioned that he doesn't have much stance at all on the middle east. It should also be mentioned that that's probably wise, because if anybody said they knew what to do there, they'd be lying.

5. Yes. His statement was perfectly reasonable. Drones have a lot of use in both non-military applications as well as security applications when the drone is not armed. They shouldn't be thrown out because very bad mistakes were made--it's those mistakes that should be prevented.
 
1. The FTT (if that's indeed what he's proposing) has always been one of the most viable and lucrative (and yet nonprohibitive to any economic activity) of any tax ever proposed. As a side benefit, it would discourage high-frequency trading, which would have some effect in stabilizing financial markets.

2. Yes. It's minimal, and the returns of his programs would provide a much-needed economic boost--increased minimum wage would divert more money to stay circulating within local economies rather than go straight up to the financial sector, increasing money velocity. Single-payer healthcare would cut out a lot of bureacracy and legal fees from the healthcare system, not to mention remove the burden of healthcare coverage from employers, drastically reducing the costs of starting a small business.

3. Yes. His comment was the most focused on both human rights and reason. The other candidates' responses were rubbish in one direction or the other.

4. I do not. His pro-Israel stance is the worst of his positions for me. It should be mentioned that he doesn't have much stance at all on the middle east. It should also be mentioned that that's probably wise, because if anybody said they knew what to do there, they'd be lying.

5. Yes. His statement was perfectly reasonable. Drones have a lot of use in both non-military applications as well as security applications when the drone is not armed. They shouldn't be thrown out because very bad mistakes were made--it's those mistakes that should be prevented.

so lets see according to people that score the budgets sanders would cost the US 18 trillion dollars in NEW spending.
NEW spending is money in addition to what we currently are over a 10 year period.

now to pay for this with the taxes he proposes will only maybe bring in 6.5 trillion over 10 years.
he is about 12 trillion short.

so umm no sanders is the last thing this country needs.
 
so lets see according to people that score the budgets sanders would cost the US 18 trillion dollars in NEW spending.

Incorrect; in actuality, according to Professor Gerald Friedman himself, the academic who the WSJ cited to arrive at its 18 trillion figure by dishonestly and deliberately cherrypicking his analysis, Bernie's proposals would in fact save 5 trillion over a 5 year period.

An Open Letter to the Wall Street Journal on Its Bernie Sanders Hit Piece | Gerald Friedman

The Wall Street Journal gets whacked: How its Bernie Sanders hit piece completely backfired - Salon.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...-bankrupt-america-to-the-tune-of-18-trillion/
 
Back
Top Bottom