How do you explain this immigrant dominance in owning store?
The fact that he can or cannot come up with another hypothesis has no bearing on whether or not your hypothesis is correct.
Firstly, though, you should demonstrate that your observation about immigrants "dominance in owning store" is accurate.
Where did you get this info? Will you share it?
And what about the lack of regulations to keep America for Americans and American businesses for Americans?
What are you saying here? Are you advocating that we do not let foreign companies do business in the US with Americans? Or what exactly?
Also, what's with this requirement to research sources, most of which are self-serving and secretive, before anyone can make a statement on his own?
On occasion, people on the internet are wrong.
Providing sources allows everyone in the conversation see the evidence and make up their own minds based on the evidence presented.
I have seen one or more wacky theory on the internet which was based on erroneous assumptions about what was factual.
Because I have been burnt before, I prefer to see for myself rather than just believe random anonymous persons from the interwebs.
You mileage may vary.
Perhaps you have never come across erroneous or faulty information on the internet. idk.
Every time I read something I might one day post on the Internet, I must write down the source or else shut up about it?
There's this thing called a search engine which allows you to access w ide variety of information based upon certain parameters you choose. For instance, you can use a search engine to find out about your dog's skin condition, your Aunt Edna's exceptional flatulence, or the laws surrounding owning w/e stores you're on about.
This wa, you don't have to write down every source, you just have to remember enough of the data to find it again via a search engine.
this link will take you to a search engine:
Google
gl
That's just a sneaky way of censoring debate.
Not providing sources is a way of promoting any old crackpot idea whatsoever w/o regard to whether or not that idea has any basis in reality.
As I noted above, I have already seen with my own eyes at least one case of someone on the internet providing erroneous data and drawing bad conclusions from that bad data. So, now I am a little wiser and less credulous. You may not have run into any info which you were skeptical of, but I assure you, it's out there.
I ask people to take a pick; either believe what I suspect or continue passively believing what you are told by higher authorities, all of whom think you deserve to be looking up to them.
May we please choose to examine the facts as best as we can find them and make our own informed decisions based on that information? Please?
As for me, I think the structure of America is upside down, so I don't look up to anybody in a higher position as deserving to be there.
Does this cause you to have reservations about your Dr.'s advice? It's not like spending years studying and practicing gives him any realy specialized knowledge or skills that we all don't already have. Is it? I mean, I had my appendix taken out under a shade tree and I am just fine.
People like doctors, engineers, etc are just scammers pretending that they're the only ones who know how to diagnose, perform surgery, build skyscrapers, and design aircraft. really any of us can do that stuff. Why trust these supposed "experts"? Amirite?
Is it okay to put you in that same category of people who I don't automatically believe just because of your status?
Cause I am kind of feeling that I should put in that category. I"d really rather see the facts for myself and draw my own conclusions. But that's just me.
I ask all the source freaks, "Which ventriloquist are you a dummy for?"
Maybe it's just because I live so close to the MO border, but I am kind of a show-me guy.
As always, your mileage may vary.
:shrug:
