• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Report: GOP Observors in Philly being Removed and Replaced with more Democrats.

It just isnt nice to call people names, unless of course that is all you have left. How can the red letter text be proven a hundred times over? If a thousand liberals dont break the law dosent that "prove" the opposite a thousand times over? Overall I would say your post should really embaress you.
Masada said:
Listen clown, it's not about passing out water for Christ sake. They were WITHIN THE VOTING HOUSE electioneering. You probably don't even know what "electioneering" is!!!!! It's freakin illegal! It's not about the water, or the donuts, or coffee.....geeeez.

It's about them being there, in NAACP shirts, commandeering people to vote "straight ticket" Democrat. That's electioneering, and it's illegal, and they refused to stop. Like I said, typical liberal morons who just say fuk the law, we've gotta get Obama elected.

Only a flaming liberal moron would call a citation of illegal activity as "whining". Either you respect the law, or you don't. And it's been proven a hundred times over that liberals don't respect the law, not if it means getting Obama elected. To hell with it.
Click to expand...
 
Boo Radley said:
Show someone breaking the law and I'll listen.
Click to expand...

Don't be so blind. Assuming the OP is true then that means a judge had to intervene due to the unlawful ejection of Republican poll inspectors.
 
digsbe said:
Don't be so blind. Assuming the OP is true then that means a judge had to intervene due to the unlawful ejection of Republican poll inspectors.
Click to expand...

You assume a lot, and I wouldn't. But if it were true and the judge intervened, that doesn't equal illegal. It suggests a conflict which was settled.
 
Boo Radley said:
You assume a lot, and I wouldn't. But if it were true and the judge intervened, that doesn't equal illegal. It suggests a conflict which was settled.
Click to expand...

One Republican was apparently assaulted when he/she was shoved out the door. That's illegal. The assaulting Dem judge could be prosecuted for that.
 
mak2 said:
It just isnt nice to call people names, unless of course that is all you have left.
Click to expand...

Sometimes it helps get their attention... :cool:
 
I wonder what kind of shenanigans took place during that time before the Republican officials were let back in after the court order.
 
American said:
One Republican was apparently assaulted when he/she was shoved out the door. That's illegal. The assaulting Dem judge could be prosecuted for that.
Click to expand...

Notice your word apparently. You need more than that. The whining is pervasive. Too many think every little thing is an assault. See McDonald's coffee is hot. :coffeepap
 
Busloads, I mean big busloads of Illegals from some where were just voting to beat hell. Over and over and over. The Black Panther were guarding the door handing out water or whiskey and more busloads come and more and then came the UN and...sorry, but I really used to beleive this stuff.
Erod said:
I wonder what kind of shenanigans took place during that time before the Republican officials were let back in after the court order.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
It just isnt nice to call people names, unless of course that is all you have left. How can the red letter text be proven a hundred times over? If a thousand liberals dont break the law dosent that "prove" the opposite a thousand times over? Overall I would say your post should really embaress you.
Click to expand...

The subject WAS of Democrats breaking the law in Houston. Ironically, you missed that entirely. The subject wasn't about all the liberals who obeyed the law, the subject was those who were breaking it, and how you liberals just ignore it, like it's meaningless.

like you just did.....

What should embarrass people, is when Americans intentionally break the law, and other Americans ignore it because it helps them politically. Bill Maher doesn't embarrass you, the illegal activity of ACORN doesn't embarrass you. Obama's handling of Benghazi doesn't embarrass you. But then you have the nerve to try and lecture someone else on what should embarrass them! The audacity!

I can't wait for tonight.....
 
Boo Radley said:
Notice your word apparently. You need more than that. The whining is pervasive. Too many think every little thing is an assault. See McDonald's coffee is hot. :coffeepap
Click to expand...

For the last time....electioneering is illegal.

Thanks for proving soundly, that liberals care nothing about the law, so long as it means Obama gets more votes. Like I said, yall have proven that over and over and over again. Breaking the law is acceptable, as long as it helps Obama. You've proven that nicely.
 
Masada said:
For the last time....electioneering is illegal.

Thanks for proving soundly, that liberals care nothing about the law, so long as it means Obama gets more votes. Like I said, yall have proven that over and over and over again. Breaking the law is acceptable, as long as it helps Obama. You've proven that nicely.
Click to expand...

Again, show the law and someone doing it.
 
I was talking about your post, the part where you called people names and made some mindless claim about something being prove a 100 times over or something. No, I did not miss anything.
Masada said:
The subject WAS of Democrats breaking the law in Houston. Ironically, you missed that entirely. The subject wasn't about all the liberals who obeyed the law, the subject was those who were breaking it, and how you liberals just ignore it, like it's meaningless.

like you just did.....

What should embarrass people, is when Americans intentionally break the law, and other Americans ignore it because it helps them politically. Bill Maher doesn't embarrass you, the illegal activity of ACORN doesn't embarrass you. Obama's handling of Benghazi doesn't embarrass you. But then you have the nerve to try and lecture someone else on what should embarrass them! The audacity!

I can't wait for tonight.....
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
It just isnt nice to call people names, unless of course that is all you have left. How can the red letter text be proven a hundred times over? If a thousand liberals dont break the law dosent that "prove" the opposite a thousand times over? Overall I would say your post should really embaress you.
Click to expand...

As for the name calling....I call it like I see it. Look up the word "moron". I'm sick of people who simply can't accept truth. In Houston, the NAACP was electioneering in a polling place. That is illegal. Instead of liberals saying, "ya, they cant do that", they go out there and try to change the argument to be about something else.

It's the law I'm speaking of. Either you respect it, or you don't. And in this case, this liberal wasn't respecting anything about the law. But trying to make the debate about "handing out water" for Christ sake. Either you liberals are the dumbest people on Earth, or you simply just try to change the subject to avoid any criticisms......

I stand by the law, and the law says that electioneering within 100 feet of a polling house IS ILLEGAL! Game over. That's it. They were breaking the law, and when told to stop, they refused. End of story. But watch, all you liberals will defend it!
 
Listen to yourself man. Are you ok? All he is asking is for some evidence that really happened and there is really a law. You could jsut say you have no evidence. So do you and where is it?
Masada said:
As for the name calling....I call it like I see it. Look up the word "moron". I'm sick of people who simply can't accept truth. In Houston, the NAACP was electioneering in a polling place. That is illegal. Instead of liberals saying, "ya, they cant do that", they go out there and try to change the argument to be about something else.

It's the law I'm speaking of. Either you respect it, or you don't. And in this case, this liberal wasn't respecting anything about the law. But trying to make the debate about "handing out water" for Christ sake. Either you liberals are the dumbest people on Earth, or you simply just try to change the subject to avoid any criticisms......

I stand by the law, and the law says that electioneering within 100 feet of a polling house IS ILLEGAL! Game over. That's it. They were breaking the law, and when told to stop, they refused. End of story. But watch, all you liberals will defend it!
Click to expand...
 
Boo Radley said:
Again, show the law and someone doing it.
Click to expand...

For Christ sake.....

Here's the freaking law Boo, geeez:

Texas Election Code - Section 85.036. Electioneering Prohibited - Texas Attorney Resources - Texas Laws

And here's the freaking liberals guilty of breaking it in Houston:

BREAKING: NAACP Takes Over Houston Polling Station, Advocates for President Obama - Katie Pavlich

Now, shut the hell up about it. It's illegal, and they did it. End of story. They weren't just "passing out water", they were telling people to vote "straight ticket" democrat. It's illegal. But they didn't care. In fact, they refused to stop their activities. Just like a liberal, FUK THE LAW!
 
Boo Radley said:
Again, show the law and someone doing it.
Click to expand...

Each state has their own Election Code which prohibits electioneering within a range of polling places. Pennsylvania is 10 feet, Ohio is 100.
 
Masada said:
For Christ sake.....

Here's the freaking law Boo, geeez:

Texas Election Code - Section 85.036. Electioneering Prohibited - Texas Attorney Resources - Texas Laws

And here's the freaking liberals guilty of breaking it in Houston:

BREAKING: NAACP Takes Over Houston Polling Station, Advocates for President Obama - Katie Pavlich

Now, shut the hell up about it. It's illegal, and they did it. End of story. They weren't just "passing out water", they were telling people to vote "straight ticket" democrat. It's illegal. But they didn't care. In fact, they refused to stop their activities. Just like a liberal, FUK THE LAW!
Click to expand...

Only one person as best I can find out has claimed they where electioneering, and that person was a republican operative.
 
Masada said:
For Christ sake.....

Here's the freaking law Boo, geeez:

Texas Election Code - Section 85.036. Electioneering Prohibited - Texas Attorney Resources - Texas Laws

And here's the freaking liberals guilty of breaking it in Houston:

BREAKING: NAACP Takes Over Houston Polling Station, Advocates for President Obama - Katie Pavlich

Now, shut the hell up about it. It's illegal, and they did it. End of story. They weren't just "passing out water", they were telling people to vote "straight ticket" democrat. It's illegal. But they didn't care. In fact, they refused to stop their activities. Just like a liberal, FUK THE LAW!
Click to expand...

I see a claim, not evidence. Perhaps the judge did nothing because nothing claimed was actually happening. But, if actual evidence shows up, we'll see. You're too willing to believe.
 
Samhain said:
Each state has their own Election Code which prohibits electioneering within a range of polling places. Pennsylvania is 10 feet, Ohio is 100.
Click to expand...

I know. But knowing the specifics for the specific place helps understand better if a law was broken.
 
townhall.com that is proof right there. By the way, how is electioneering defined?
 
They really really really want to blieve, like those imaginary busses that vote all over the place for democrats.
Boo Radley said:
I see a claim, not evidence. Perhaps the judge did nothing because nothing claimed was actually happening. But, if actual evidence shows up, we'll see. You're too willing to believe.
Click to expand...
 
Boo Radley said:
I see a claim, not evidence. Perhaps the judge did nothing because nothing claimed was actually happening. But, if actual evidence shows up, we'll see. You're too willing to believe.
Click to expand...

AS Paul Harvey would say, he is the rest of the story:

Voting article prompts polling questions | News - Home

In the article, a person claiming to be a poll watcher accused the NAACP members of advocating for President Barack Obama inside the polling location and picking people to move to the front of the line. The article said election officials ignored the problem.


Assistant County Attorney Douglas Ray said much of the story is untrue. "That's not the complete story," Ray said.

Ray said his team never saw NAACP members advocating for a candidate. He said NAACP members did get confrontational before they agreed to the election rules.
Click to expand...

This whole thing is another example of republican's victim complex and love of conspiracy theories and lies.
 
Most folks in politics realize it's more advantageous for them to apologise later than seek permission first. This seems to have always been the case where it comes to breaking electioneering law.
 
Much of that story is untrue. Which calls into question the rest of the story.
clownboy said:
Most folks in politics realize it's more advantageous for them to apologise later than seek permission first. This seems to have always been the case where it comes to breaking electioneering law.
Click to expand...
 
mak2 said:
townhall.com that is proof right there. By the way, how is electioneering defined?
Click to expand...

Really? You're that in the bag for your "team" that you're pulling out stops to defend electioneering near and in the polls? You're sitting in front of a computer - you can easily find the definition of electioneering and some descriptions as to why it's illegal in EVERY state.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom