• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Bright side of a loss for either

mbig

onomatopoeic
DP Veteran
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
10,350
Reaction score
4,989
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Obama doesn't look well.
His health might be better served in a different setting.
I don't think he was prepared for the viciousness of the attacks.
Hillary would have been better in that respect.
And they wouldn't have wanted to "take the country back" from her because, well, she's white,

If Romney loses, he could just run for Massachusetts Governor again as a Democrat or Republican.
Completely unphased.
Just wind him back up and give him [yet] a new set of positions.
 
Last edited:
The real bright side on November 7th will be the lack of campaign ads.
 
Obama doesn't look well.
His health might be better served in a different setting.
I don't think he was prepared for the viciousness of the attacks.
Hillary would have been better in that respect.
And they wouldn't have wanted to "take the country back" from her because, well, she's white,

The race card, really?

If Romney loses - well - he could just run for Massachusetts Governor again as a Democrat or Republican.
Completely unphased.
Just wind him back up and give him [yet] a new set of positions.

I've heard several left wingers complain that Obama was not left wing enough, so this could be true of him as well.
 
The real bright side on November 7th will be the lack of campaign ads.

You have got that right! I am sick of all the bulls--t!! Can't wait for it to be over!!
 
Obama doesn't look well.
His health might be better served in a different setting.
I don't think he was prepared for the viciousness of the attacks.
Hillary would have been better in that respect.
And they wouldn't have wanted to "take the country back" from her because, well, she's white,

If Romney loses, he could just run for Massachusetts Governor again as a Democrat or Republican.
Completely unphased.
Just wind him back up and give him [yet] a new set of positions.

Wow!! Someone needs to update their lean from "other" to "crazy left wing progressive/liberal"
 
I never thought I would miss the Christmas ads after Halloween. I do.
The real bright side on November 7th will be the lack of campaign ads.
 
The race card, really?
You're right.
There's no Race factor in the election at all.
How Could I!

x Fatcor said:
I've heard several left wingers complain that Obama was not left wing enough, so this could be true of him as well.
That's certainly true.
But of course, despite that and offers of, ie, budget compromise, (2.5:1 spending cuts/revs) Many on the right claim he's a socialist/communist/Muslim etc.

Wow!! Someone needs to update their lean from "other" to "crazy left wing progressive/liberal"
Troll much? You might want to look at my last few posts re Christie/Rubio etc. before making an ass of yourself.
 
Last edited:
I heard on NPR today 90% of Republicans are white. Just sayin that could be why there is a misconcpetion about being a diverse party.
 
I heard on NPR today 90% of Republicans are white. Just sayin that could be why there is a misconcpetion about being a diverse party.

What does that have to do with this thread? Come on Leatherneck, stay focused and on topic.
 
They had just said it when I was reading this thread. Focus? At work? no way...:confused:
The race card, really?



I've heard several left wingers complain that Obama was not left wing enough, so this could be true of him as well.

What does that have to do with this thread? Come on Leatherneck, stay focused and on topic.
 
You're right.
There's no Race factor in the election at all.
How Could I!

Oh yeah, what was I thinking? There could be no legit criticism of Obama. It's all racism.
 
I heard on NPR today 90% of Republicans are white. Just sayin that could be why there is a misconcpetion about being a diverse party.

You don't get math. This says that too many minorities don't think for themselves, sadly.

There's a LOT of white Democrats and a LOT of white Republicans.

Most minorities question almost nothing and fall into line as they're told. There's no power in that for their respective races, just power for a sinister political powerhouse. That's not diversity; that's mindlessness.
 
You don't get math. This says that too many minorities don't think for themselves, sadly.

There's a LOT of white Democrats and a LOT of white Republicans.

Most minorities question almost nothing and fall into line as they're told. There's no power in that for their respective races, just power for a sinister political powerhouse. That's not diversity; that's mindlessness.

So, you are claiming that most minorities are mindless? Could you please explain that to me. I am interested in how you come to that conclusion.
 
So, you are claiming that most minorities are mindless? Could you please explain that to me. I am interested in how you come to that conclusion.

90+ percent of any group should not agree on virtually anything, let alone a presidential candidate. When your vote is that predictable, you have no power. You're not only taken for granted, you're needs and opinions are not respected. It's a sad reality that Democrats exploit and foster without mercy.
 
90+ percent of any group should not agree on virtually anything, let alone a presidential candidate. When your vote is that predictable, you have no power. You're not only taken for granted, you're needs and opinions are not respected. It's a sad reality that Democrats exploit and foster without mercy.

So, since the majority of white males are voting for Romney, this applies to them also, right?
 
So, since the majority of white males are voting for Romney, this applies to them also, right?

Majority, but not 90+ percent crazy majority. White men believe in lower taxes and smaller government generally because they make up the MAJORITY of tax revenue base.
 
Obama doesn't look well.
His health might be better served in a different setting.
I don't think he was prepared for the viciousness of the attacks.
Hillary would have been better in that respect.
And they wouldn't have wanted to "take the country back" from her because, well, she's white,

If Romney loses, he could just run for Massachusetts Governor again as a Democrat or Republican.
Completely unphased.
Just wind him back up and give him [yet] a new set of positions.

Another bright side is at least some of the attempts at white-guilt race-baiting as in the message above might diminish - although if Obama loses Democrats will of course blame it on voters being racists so there will be flurry of it for a while.
 
Obama doesn't look well.
His health might be better served in a different setting.
I don't think he was prepared for the viciousness of the attacks.
Hillary would have been better in that respect.
And they wouldn't have wanted to "take the country back" from her because, well, she's white,

If Romney loses, he could just run for Massachusetts Governor again as a Democrat or Republican.
Completely unphased.
Just wind him back up and give him [yet] a new set of positions.

You're already painting Obama as a victim?

Nice... Don't expect anything less when he gets bounced tomorrow.
 
I just heard statistics today, while men are in office as president, their appearance seems to age quite rapidly. But, when they've left the office, retired presdients, as a whole, live longer than most men.
 
I dont get math? Really? Seems to me like it says minorities do think for themselves and the republican party does not have their best interest at heart, and they figured that out all by themselves. Which, by the way, it true. No one said a thing about Democratic demographics. I think your defensivness and refering to minorities not being able to think for themselves speaks very clearly of your personal beliefs. The bolded part in particular.
You don't get math. This says that too many minorities don't think for themselves, sadly.

There's a LOT of white Democrats and a LOT of white Republicans.

Most minorities question almost nothing and fall into line as they're told. There's no power in that for their respective races, just power for a sinister political powerhouse. That's not diversity; that's mindlessness.
 
The bright side for Obama would be that he would be worth $100+M in 4 years as a political "Rock Star". The bright side for Romney is that he still has character and conviction to live a full life outside of politics like he has done in the past and the tools to continue to help others.
 
I just heard statistics today, while men are in office as president, their appearance seems to age quite rapidly. But, when they've left the office, retired presdients, as a whole, live longer than most men.


That is in part because of they are usually somewhere between middle-aged and senior citizen when they go in, and are more senior citizen when they come out. That is just the point in life where people's hair gets noticeably more gray; baldness sets in; weight gain occurs, etc even if they were not the President. I imagine you look older than you did 8 years ago too, you just don't notice it as much.
 
Of course they are aging, when they go in. Plus, they have the best of medical insurance for life, after that office.
 
Back
Top Bottom