• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Seriously Libertarians?

yeah, this is all one big joke to you, but you have offered up no substance at all. the only thing close to substance you claim was a joke about looking stoned. I will openly admit i think that is a piss poor way to vote. I think that is even worse than people who vote on party lines no matter what.
I can make jokes about something without actually thinking the said entity is a joke. Apparently you cannot.

Additionally, you seem fixated on this erroneous idea that I made my decision just by looking at her picture. Not sure where you got that.

Edit: See, I did a search for her name, and this came up near the top: Marakay Rogers - Ballotpedia

Tell me you wouldn't find an issue with someone if their picture looks like they're half asleep or stoned (what, you couldn't spend a few bucks to get a better picture put up?), and the only two issues listed are legalizing marijuana and eliminating the death penalty.
Not that I necessarily disagree with either, but for ****s sake that's not a ****in' platform.
 
Last edited:
I can make jokes about something without actually thinking the said entity is a joke. Apparently you cannot.

Additionally, you seem fixated on this erroneous idea that I made my decision just by looking at her picture. Not sure where you got that.

Edit: See, I did a search for her name, and this came up near the top: Marakay Rogers - Ballotpedia

Tell me you wouldn't find an issue with someone if their picture looks like they're half asleep or stoned (what, you couldn't spend a few bucks to get a better picture put up?), and the only two issues listed are legalizing marijuana and eliminating the death penalty.
Not that I necessarily disagree with either, but for ****s sake that's not a ****in' platform.

Don't make excuses for your vapid post. Next time include something meaningful.
 
Don't make excuses for your vapid post. Next time include something meaningful.
It’s a strain at times like these, not to tell someone to go **** themselves.

Sigh.

I explain my reasoning, and you come back claiming my post was “vapid” and that I’m making excuses for said vapidity.

**** it.
 
Whenever I see a Libertarian-Right claiming that the free market without any government interference is self correcting, works great, a little bird dies somewhere in the world. Its like you guys have never picked up a history book. The unregulated free market is what created unions, government regulation, these things were born FROM the free market because of what happened with monopolies, abuse, exploitation. The only reason this dumb ass idea that free markets are perfect is kept alive is because it benefits the wealthy. Less regulation, less worker rights, less government, blah blah blah it all makes it easier for those on top to make more money at everyone else's expense.

EDIT: Here read this, a little glimpse of important history. That whole period give and take 25 years is incredibly important for the formation of the modern U.S. A lot of reasons why things are a certain way come from that period.

Homestead Strike - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom