• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney runs on most vague platform in modern history

code1211 said:
He has never headed anything that was not a roaring success. What data can you present that he is not a good leader?
Click to expand...

Maybe you should ask the voters in Mass. where he was a 1 term Governor. They are voting against him in droves. I'm sure they have plenty to say about his "roaring sucess" as Gov.
 
Carleen said:
He was a venture capitalist, not a businessman. Big difference. He was in business to make money, not create jobs.
Click to expand...



Exactly how do you think jobs are created?
 
iguanaman said:
Maybe you should ask the voters in Mass. where he was a 1 term Governor. They are voting against him in droves. I'm sure they have plenty to say about his "roaring sucess" as Gov.
Click to expand...



I can't ask them. You seem to want to make us think you know. Why not share your wisdom with us?
 
Realistically, can Romney supporters actually write down their candidate's position on every major issue without getting confused? Even with the stuff I agree with Romney on, it's beyond unclear to me where he stands.

I'd venture to guess that by the time they finish that list, Romney would have already changed his opinion on at least one of those items.
 
AH, so when you said this

iguanaman said:
…There have been more filibusters by Repulbicans under Obama than the total combined number of filibusters in history!
Click to expand...

You DIDN’T lie because you meant to say this:
iguanaman said:
I wish it were a lie. I know it sounds crazy but the FACT is Cloture was invoked 63 times in 2009 and 2010, which isn't just the most ever, it's more than the sum total of instances from 1919 through 1982.
Click to expand...

Weird you start with ‘more filibusters by Repulbicans under Obama than the total combined number of filibusters in history’ but then when caught in a lie you shift the window to ‘sum total of instances from 1919 through 1982’…nice tactic…but still a lie.

Try again…
 
Dickieboy said:
AH, so when you said this



You DIDN’T lie because you meant to say this:


Weird you start with ‘more filibusters by Repulbicans under Obama than the total combined number of filibusters in history’ but then when caught in a lie you shift the window to ‘sum total of instances from 1919 through 1982’…nice tactic…but still a lie.

Try again…
Click to expand...

I will if you will tell me what bills the Senate cooperated on and allowed a vote without a filibuster. Obama had about 3 months with 60 votes and just about everything of importance was passed then. You could also tell me why Congressional approval is at an all time low since Obama has been in office?
 
iguanaman said:
I will if you will tell me what bills the Senate cooperated on and allowed a vote without a filibuster. Obama had about 3 months with 60 votes and just about everything of importance was passed then. You could also tell me why Congressional approval is at an all time low since Obama has been in office?
Click to expand...

What would be the point? Seriously, you lied, you got caught, you moved the goal post...own it!

...pathetic
 
Dickieboy said:
What would be the point? Seriously, you lied, you got caught, you moved the goal post...own it!

...pathetic
Click to expand...

Which is exactly what the polls show the American people think of the Republican House and it's obstructionist anti-American behavior. They better wise up in Obama's next term or they will be out ontheir ears.
 
iguanaman said:
Which is exactly what the polls show the American people think of the Republican House and it's obstructionist anti-American behavior. They better wise up in Obama's next term or they will be out ontheir ears.
Click to expand...

Ah...I see let's just start up in another stadium...you lied and got caught...own it!

...pathetic
 
I think the flip-flopping will hurt him more than anything else.
 
iguanaman said:
Which is exactly what the polls show the American people think of the Republican House and it's obstructionist anti-American behavior. They better wise up in Obama's next term or they will be out ontheir ears.
Click to expand...

I just love it when Progressives/Liberals use the term "obstructionist", they forget what their party (and the media) did to President G. H. W. Bush. They made sure he had no choice but to sign new taxes into law, then used that against him.
 
BACotner said:
I just love it when Progressives/Liberals use the term "obstructionist", they forget what their party (and the media) did to President G. H. W. Bush. They made sure he had no choice but to sign new taxes into law, then used that against him.
Click to expand...

Right it's always the Democrats that makes a HUGE issue out of raising taxes. What a strange world you live in. Clinton raised taxes and got re-elected easily. Obama will be re-elected in part for wanting to restore those rates for the upper brackets. Bush I lost because Clinton had better ideas not because of taxes.
 
iguanaman said:
Right it's always the Democrats that makes a HUGE issue out of raising taxes. What a strange world you live in. Clinton raised taxes and got re-elected easily. Obama will be re-elected in part for wanting to restore those rates for the upper brackets. Bush I lost because Clinton had better ideas not because of taxes.
Click to expand...

This slant on history brought to you by a member from the great State of Florida, where they couldn't even properly cast a ballot in 2000.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom