• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney runs on most vague platform in modern history

Cite evidence that Obama's stated plan results in higher debt than romney's.

we know that Obama has racked up tons of debt and he has failed to meet the standards he promised he would

The best you can do is to SPECULATE that a guy who has been pretty much 100% successful in every job he has held would be a FAILURE of worse proportions compared to a guy who has already proven to have failed to meet his own standard for success
 
that will really help the deficit.

"Deficit" is what the GOP is all about.

$2000 check from me to the first GOP voter who can name a single thing a GOP President has done in the last 35 years except run up a debt to buy stupid military toys and/or start wars.
 
"Deficit" is what the GOP is all about.

$2000 check from me to the first GOP voter who can name a single thing a GOP President has done in the last 35 years except run up a debt to buy stupid military toys.

Military gear is constitutionally sound. Creating more dependent teat sucklers is not
 
Cite evidence that all debt accumulated was exclusively due to Obama's proposals.

cite that any of your posts demonstrate a LIBERTARIAN perspective. when you do that I might start complying with your silly demands. We do know that Obama has racked up tons of debt.
 
Cite evidence that Obama's stated plan results in higher debt than romney's.

Obama has a 'stated plan'? Please...point one with specifics out...
 
we know that Obama has racked up tons of debt and he has failed to meet the standards he promised he would

The best you can do is to SPECULATE that a guy who has been pretty much 100% successful in every job he has held

We all know who that isn't. . .

To uncover the true story behind the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's $10 million bailout of Mitt Romney and Bain & Company, Rolling Stone made a Freedom of Information Act request that forced the FDIC to release more than 500 of pages of records.

Read more: Mitt Romney's Federal Bailout: The Documents Pictures | Rolling Stone
 
In short, a Romney presidency is a wild gamble with America's future.

As opposed to an incumbent who's been a four-year failure, whose platform is: "but, but, but I need four more years!"
 
We all know who that isn't. . .

once again a prediction made by a far left Obama slurping author

we do know that Obunny has jacked up the deficit
 
As opposed to an incumbent who's been a four-year failure, whose platform is: "but, but, but I need four more years!"

lefties often hate america-they will pick a sure failure over a possible success
 
Military gear is constitutionally sound.

AS we expected--righties believe stupid military toys and wars are constitutionally mandated. Can it get more pathetic ? :lol:
 
once again a prediction made by a far left Obama slurping author

we do know that Obunny has jacked up the deficit

And we're still waiting for evidence that it has anything to do w/Obama's proposals (as opposed to GOP pork added to the bills).
 
AS we expected--righties believe stupid military toys and wars are constitutionally mandated. Can it get more pathetic ? :lol:

1) your posts do not suggest you have the expertise to determine what are necessary military items and what are wasteful

2) your posts demonstrate you have no real ability to discuss the tenth amendment and federalism and given you pretend to be a libertarian, I find it hard to take anything you say seriously given that complete disconnect with reality expressed in your lean

3) your posts have never demonstrated that you can argue constitutional issues so your claim as to what is pathetic has no sound basis in reality
 
And we're still waiting for evidence that it has anything to do w/Obama's proposals (as opposed to GOP pork added to the bills).

yeah the GOP had that power the first two years of Obunny's regime
 
Actually Romney's is the most specific.

What is Obama's plan other than to repeal the Bush tax cutss he then endorsed as the Obama tax cuts and signed into them law after vowing not to do so 500 times in his 2008 campaign? The perfect, "believe when I tell you I'm not lying to you this time" campaign.

This is Obama's ONLY plan: "I promise against I will repeal the tax cuts I signed into law after promising I would not. Yes, I lied to everyone last time about my economic plan, but you gotta believe I really, really, really mean it this time."
 
Actually Romney's is the most specific.

Yep, "specific". . .

But the tax cut would cost nearly $5 trillion, and removing tax deductions doesn’t come close to offsetting that loss, unless deductions are cut for the middle-class. In spite of all this, the Romney campaign has adamantly claimed that the numbers do indeed add up.
But now, even Fox News seems be admitting that the math isn’t there. Fox Business host Stuart Varney — a stalwart conservative who openly cheers for Republicans — admitted on Fox and Freinds that he can’t explain how much revenue Romney’s plan would raise:

Fox Business Host Admits That Romney's Tax Plan Doesn't Add Up | ThinkProgress
 
Dennis I can never spell his last name-avich had a far more vague platform than Romney.
 
solletica said:
And we're still waiting for evidence that it has anything to do w/Obama's proposals (as opposed to GOP pork added to the bills).
yeah the GOP had that power the first two years of Obunny's regime

Still waiting for evidence. . .

$2000 check to the first GOPer who can actually provide evidence of something he claims when asked for it.
 
Yeah, he specifically endorses every side of every issue.

specious garbage-Romney has not done something akin to Obama whining about

1) that the Bush tax cuts were only for the rich
2) then claiming that the tax cuts for everyone but the rich are good
3) and then extending all of the Bush tax rates

Romney has never bashed success
 
Still waiting for evidence. . .

$2000 check to the first GOPer who can actually provide evidence of something he claims when asked for it.


2000 bucks if I prove that Obama had a dem house and senate his first two years in office?

easy money-can you prove any libertarian posts you have authored?
 
Back
Top Bottom