• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Cohen trashes obama

So only you're allowed to have an opinion, and if someone else presents one, it's irrelevant?

Actually, I do feel that way about the blistering Liberal drones like Paul Krugman and the other partisans who write tripe attempting to make Obama look credible, so I guess I get it.

You can have all the opinions you would like. It's credibility that matters and Cohen is not credible. He is considered by the liberal media to be a hack.

There are liberal opinion writers from whom this would have weight. Cohen is not one of them.
 
If he was an Obama supporter, he sure was an odd one.

July of 2008


Richard Cohen - Obama the Unknown

Obama The Unknown



September 9, 2008
Richard Cohen - Too Cool to Fight?



In June of 2008, Cohen had this to say about McCain.

Richard Cohen - McCain's Core Advantage

McCain's Core Advantage


It was only McCain's dishonesty that turned him to support Obama.

September 17, 2008
Richard Cohen - The Ugly New McCain



He voted against McCain. He was not an Obama supporter.[/
QUOTE]

Fair point, he is however a huge liberal that says he will vote for obama again because he hates Romney so much and the fact that he has always seen through obama's facade and has so successfully pulled back the curtain on the little wizard should give all you libs something to think about.
 
You can have all the opinions you would like. It's credibility that matters and Cohen is not credible. He is considered by the liberal media to be a hack.

There are liberal opinion writers from whom this would have weight. Cohen is not one of them.

Anyone who does not support obama is considered a hack by the media.
 
Screw the author of this article and every other hack/fraud who lied to the public in 2008 and sold this Hope and Change Cult Leader as some type of messianic God

They are just as accountable for the destruction to our country as Obama is. Hollywood, the MSM, Academia, all of them are responsible and Obama and the Democrats.
 
Romney isn't the bright, shining hope for conservatives.

And you're forgetting the number of libertarian Republicans who supported Ron Paul will likely vote for Gary Johnson instead.

So any Democrats who stay home will probably be offset by Johnson getting the libertarian vote.

So if Romney wins, it definitely won't be by a landslide.

As a rule I no longer donate to this forum because it is run by and for libs but I bet you 10 donation bucks Romney wins in a landslide of historic proportions. Is it a bet?
 
As a rule I no longer donate to this forum because it is run by and for libs but I bet you 10 donation bucks Romney wins in a landslide of historic proportions. Is it a bet?

It depends.

What would you consider "a landslide" victory by Romney?
 
as a rule i no longer donate to this forum because it is run by and for libs but i bet you 10 donation bucks romney wins in a landslide of historic proportions. Is it a bet?

lol...

Go Vandals!
 
A victory where the media is dumbfounded by the enormity of it and wonder aloud how the polls could have been so wrong.

No, because that is far too vague, and the media will likely tout whoever the victor is just to get more people to watch their channels just so they can charge more to advertisers.
 
Anyone who does not support obama is considered a hack by the media.

I didn't say that, nor do I believe it. There certainly are hacks who don't support President Obama, but there are also principled, credible writers who don't either.
 
I didn't say that, nor do I believe it. There certainly are hacks who don't support President Obama, but there are also principled, credible writers who don't either.

Gina show me one, just ONE editorialist that does not support obama that gets any respect whatsoever from the media.

Don't hurt yourself Gina, don't stay up all night OK.:)
 
Last edited:
I think Richard Cohen sums up the way alot of people who voted for obama feel. They will stay home election day and Romney will win in a landslide. Here is an excerpt of his editorial, the whole thing is well worth reading.

"But somewhere between the campaign and the White House itself, Obama got lost. It turned out he had no cause at all. Expanding health insurance was Hillary Clinton’s longtime goal, and even after Obama adopted it, he never argued for it with any fervor. In an unfairly mocked campaign speech, he promised to slow the rise of the oceans and begin to heal the planet. But when he took office, climate change was abandoned — too much trouble, too much opposition. His eloquence, it turned out, was reserved for campaigning.
Obama never espoused a cause bigger than his own political survival. This is the gravamen of the indictment from the left, particularly certain African Americans. They are right. Young black men fill the jails and the morgues, yet Obama says nothing.

Bobby Kennedy showed his anger, his impatience, his stunned incredulity at the state of black America. Obama shows nothing."


Richard Cohen: Obama, the president who seems not to care - The Washington Post

Which presidents have decried black crime?
 
Curiously enough the only folks I've heard refer to Obama as a Messianic figure are a scant few boneheads in random passerby viral interviews and a slew of useless pundits.
 
Look at Obama's eyes.

No really...look deep and watch close.

Cohen is correct.
 
Gina show me one, just ONE editorialist that does not support obama that gets any respect whatsoever from the media.

Don't hurt yourself Gina, don't stay up all night OK.:)

I wouldn't have to. Kathleen Parker came to mind. Yes, she voted for Obama in 2008, but Palin was a deal breaker for her. Other wise she is widely published conservative and if it makes any difference to you, she's written for Townhall as well as The Weekly Standard, though The Washington Post appears to be her home gig. I just wanted to research her for dings, in case I've missed something.

EDIT: I wanted to add, sawyer, I've been on the hunt for just such conservative opinion writers. National Affairs was recommended to me and I read a terrific article today by Fredrick Hess and Andrew Kelly on education.

http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/a-federal-education-agenda

I'm not sure if this is what you are after, but many of the writers on that site are respected.
 
Last edited:
Curiously enough the only folks I've heard refer to Obama as a Messianic figure are a scant few boneheads in random passerby viral interviews and a slew of useless pundits.

Once The Messiah, today this clip is laughable; it makes him look like a cheezy TV Preacher.
The only thing missing is... Can I hear an Amen?
Cohen must have looked at some old clips and thought... F**k do I look dumb... and sprinted to the computer to pump out that story.
 
As a rule I no longer donate to this forum because it is run by and for libs but I bet you 10 donation bucks Romney wins in a landslide of historic proportions. Is it a bet?

Heck, for the sake of the forum (which is owned by a right leaning libertarian btw) I'll take that bet. It doesn't even have to be a landslide, just winning the presidency (I'm specifying that because there's a possibility that Romney could win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote). It would be a great pleasure for me to lose that bet. Deal?
 
Heck, for the sake of the forum (which is owned by a right leaning libertarian btw) I'll take that bet. It doesn't even have to be a landslide, just winning the presidency (I'm specifying that because there's a possibility that Romney could win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote). It would be a great pleasure for me to lose that bet. Deal?

I only say the forum leans left because most of the mods are leftist and the rules here are enforced with alot of bias but your on, consider this a handshake.:)
 
I only say the forum leans left because most of the mods are leftist and the rules here are enforced with alot of bias but your on, consider this a handshake.:)

I can't like your post because I disagree with you about the bias (but this is not the place to talk about that) but the bet's on.
 
I get the does not care part, for sure, that is why his response to Sandy is better than any in history

That is why he made sure Osama was killed

That is why he made sure to save General Motors, etc...

Look, you hate Obama cuz he is Black, we know...
 
Back
Top Bottom