• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Obama Not Only Palled Around With Terrorists. He's Now Arming Them

Bronson

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
3,195
Reaction score
1,192
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
The truth of Benghazi will be the largest scandal in American History

Just in time for the election

GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate - Washington Times

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

It gets worse. Last week, Center for Security Policy senior fellow and former career CIA officer Clare Lopez observed that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with the so-called “consulate” whose purpose has yet to be disclosed. As their contents were raided in the course of the attack, we may never know for sure whether they housed — and were known by the local jihadis to house — arms, perhaps administered by the two former Navy SEALs killed along with Stevens.
 
If it could be proven Obama and half of his administration would wind up in prison.
 
The desperation is so thick you could eat it with a spoon. :lamo
 
The desperation is so thick you could eat it with a spoon. :lamo

Your Goebbals speak doesn't concern me. Whenever you post the only image I see is Bozo The Clown. Your avatar needs a clown face.

The truth about your false prophet has been exposed. What this really shows is the truth about Liberalism. You live in a delusion that if you try and be friends with terrorists and nazis, that they will want to be your friends too and not want to cut off your head anymore or throw you in an oven.

This is all tied to Obama's relationship with the President of Turkey
 
The truth of Benghazi will be the largest scandal in American History

Just in time for the election

GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate - Washington Times

The funniest paragraph in this artile is:
"Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate."
 
The truth of Benghazi will be the largest scandal in American History

Just in time for the election

GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate - Washington Times

Well, this is mind-blowing, if true.

For now, I don't believe it. Until I see it in mainstream, nothing will convince me that this is anything other than Oscar Mayer's favorite meat.

This election is ugly. And I'm betting it gets uglier still before it's over.

Romney! Watch your back!!
 
If it could be proven Obama and half of his administration would wind up in prison.

That is one big IF. The thing is, most of what the GOP and Fox news tries to accuse Obama of is made up.
 
Welcome to DP my friend....Looking forward to your input....We can always use another Conservative poster.:2wave:

Thank you!! I am happy to be here! :)
 
Shakespeare wrote a play about this: MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.
 
It'd be awesome if people read their own articles.


Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate.

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East

So really the guy who wrote this article has no solid evidence except what partisans are giving him, in the past he's been quite the zealot against muslims, opposing the ground zero mosque and even the Murfreesboro, Tennessee where he testified in court against it being allowed to be built by American citizens of the country despite the first amendment.

I'm not sure I'd blindly follow this guy story.
 
Your Goebbals speak doesn't concern me.

Blog_Godwins_Law.jpg
 
The funniest paragraph in this artile is:
"Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate."

Now there's a witches brew of conspiratorial, xenophobic partisanship.
 
Yes, facts be damned. You just know.

the facts are obvious-Obama is a failure and he hung around with some primo douche bags during his formative years. as to his current inner circle-hard to say
 
I'm so annoyed with Obama right now that I could eat his heart and laugh.

But I must say that this accusation is - well - preposterous. That's not a word I get to use very often. So Thanks.

I'm pretty perplexed by American politics and the lows to which its fallen but, really, now this has crossed the borders of bizarre.
 
Now there's a witches brew of conspiratorial, xenophobic partisanship.

What got me was the phrase intrepis investigative reporting. I use that type phrase with reporters on the frontlines risking their lives to bring us the story, and for those who paid with their lives.
You called it right. Those reporters in that article are a witches brew of conspiratorial, xenophobic partisanship.
 
the facts are obvious-Obama is a failure and he hung around with some primo douche bags during his formative years. as to his current inner circle-hard to say

Is that what you learned from the Fox/WorldNutDaily/RadicalIsalm story? :lamo

Naturally the wingnuts who cite this trash will be the first ones to cry foul over a citation to the New York Times -- winner of 108 Pulitzer Prizes.
 
BBC News - Russia: Syria rebels have US-made weapons

"We have reliable information that Syrian militants have foreign portable anti-aircraft missile systems, including those made in the USA... it should be cleared up who delivered them," Gen Makarov told journalists in Russia.

Obama has some splaining to do! If he's arming terrorists then this could literally destroy the Democratic Party. They would be finished.
 
It'd be awesome if people read their own articles.




So really the guy who wrote this article has no solid evidence except what partisans are giving him, in the past he's been quite the zealot against muslims, opposing the ground zero mosque and even the Murfreesboro, Tennessee where he testified in court against it being allowed to be built by American citizens of the country despite the first amendment.

I'm not sure I'd blindly follow this guy story.

It's not my concern you're still lost in your Obama bubble

Can't refute the story so you attack the source. It's Alinsky 101. I drink up your tears.
 
What's the point, exactly, of this cover up? Why would they cover up the point that this was a terrorist attack?
 
Back
Top Bottom